Jump to content

007 RED

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 007 RED

  1. 5 hours ago, legend49 said:

    My Australian colleague is also located in west Africa  is head of security of 4 mines and has spent all his life in " global security work" . He shows me an app on his PC that is a global database that has every persons travel listed once you enter details. So we put my Aussie passport number in, OMG it listed places I forgotten I had visited plus it showed details of my UK passport and travel. That's all I am going to say , have a happy trip and pray no smart ##s immigration person does a thorough check on your arrival.

    Sorry, but there is no such facility that will give you, or anyone else, the details of all your past travel by just entering your passport number into a computer app.

     

    The only people (or should I say companies) that would have details of your past individual travel arrangements would be the separate airline/ferry/train companies, with whom you have travelled.   This being the case, what you are suggesting is that all these companies’ computer databases are in some way linked and that anyone can just tap in a passport number and see where that person has travelled.

     

    Sorry but not a ‘cat in hells’ chance.  Firstly, no travel company is going to share your travel data with their competitors for obvious commercial reasons.  Secondly, most countries have data protection laws which limit, if not prevent the sharing of personal data without good or lawful cause.  Thirdly, linking all these hundreds of thousands of travel company database throughout the world would be a logistical nightmare and the bandwidth needed to complete just one search would probably bring down the internet

     

    Of course another conspiracy theory is that every countries’ immigration database are linked and that anyone can just enter a person’s passport number and see which countries someone has been too.  Again, not a ‘cat in hells’ chance of such a facility existing.  Governments do share information for national security reasons but only on a case-by-case basis and they would certainly not give access to such information to any member of the public via an app.

     

    FYI…. I spent over 10 years of my life as a principle co-ordinator on the joint NSA – GCHQ eBorder project following 911.  My contribution to this project included overseeing the design, development, testing and installation of various eBorder systems such as machine readable travel documents, ePassports (so called biometric passports) and the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS).  Following my retirement from the project I have continued to work with both national security agencies on a consultancy basis and to this date I’ve never seen or heard of such an app as you describe. 

     

    If such an app does exist, please share the details as I’m sure every TV member would love to access it.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 hours ago, CGW said:

    The Pilot is the only person permitted to "drive" the plane when being towed so obviously he was in "control" of the brakes, the vehicle doing the towing was in "command"

    A 'pilot', as in a person who is licenced to fly that particular type of aircraft does not need to be in the cockpit when an aircraft does not have any passengers on board, is not under power and being towed, as in this case from a remote parking stand to the terminal building.

     

    It is perfectly acceptable for a member of the ground staff to be sitting in the left hand (pilot's) seat provided that that person has been trained and certified to undertake the task. 

     

    Normally that person will be a technician and their function will be to start up the Auxiliary Power Unit to provide electrical power for lights (when necessary) and for the electric motor which provided the necessary pressure for the hydraulic systems (brakes).  He is also responsible for releasing and applying the parking brake, checking the hydraulic pressure gauges and maintaining a lookout during the tow.

     

    Braking during towing is normally the responsibility of the tug driver.  This has to be done very gradually as a sudden or sharp braking can lead to the nose wheel assembly being damaged.

     

    Depending upon individual protocols, either the tug driver or the person in the left hand seat will be solely responsible for communications with ATC to obtain clearance for ground movements etc.  In the case where the person in the left hand seat is responsible for ATC comms, the tug driver must have facilities to overhear these comms.

     

    The person in the left hand seat is not responsible for steering the plane whilst the tow bar is attached, that is the sole responsibility of the tug driver.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, Brigand said:

    My Mrs says he's posting on Facebook whilst he's doing this ... an example of it is a post about him saying his trigger finger is getting tired. Geez man ... not good.

    Mrs MoneyBaht reports the same.... he's streaming live on Facebook... now reports 14 dead and many wounded.

  4. 32 minutes ago, Scott Tracy said:

    An unfortunate incident.

    Comments have been made that the report 'incorrectly states' that the aircraft was being towed to a disembarkation point. I don't know if the report is true or if the commenters are correct.

    I cannot see passengers or steps in place in the photographs. 

    One commenter says a tow bar break is a rare occurrence, which, in my experience, it is. But it does happen. There is a shear pin in the bar, designed to break before tug pulls the nose landing gear off the aircraft.

    There is normally a person on the flight deck, briefed to operate the brakes. Tug drivers normally signal by horn toots. It does help enormously if the brake system is presurised. Pumping and releasing the brakes on an aircraft a couple of times will depressurise the system, unless the system is kept pressurised.

    The tug driver may well have signalled the brake man on the flight deck and expected the aircraft to stop. 

    When I was learning tug driving, I was told if the pin breaks, if it's a push, stop, if it's a pull, drive away in the direction of travel if you can. In both cases, blowing the horn, or shouting or both, so the brake person can see whatever is happening.

     

    RIP tug driver. 

     

    Scott, I agree with your comments but having seen the video of this incident several times this morning on various TV news channels I have a horrible feeling that the tug was possibly exceeding the speed limits for a manoeuvre he was about to make.

     

    The plane was being towed from its remote overnight stand along taxiway K and was due to make a left turn onto taxiway H.  From the video, it looks to me as though tug and plane were moving fairly quickly along the straight taxiway (K) and the tug driver left his braking very late to slow the palne down before making the left hand turn.  The 66 Ton aircraft appears to push the tug as the tug begins the left hand turn.  The momentum of the aircraft would want to continue in a straight line but the tow bar would have prevented this and the plane can be seen to suddenly swing left.  It almost looks like the tug and plane 'jack knifed' causing the tug to stop and the plane then rolling over the tug.  The tug is seen on several photos wedged under the left hand side of the aircraft fuselage.

     

    Other photos that I have seen show the tow bar is intact but completely removed from the tug and the aircraft and it is bent at about a 30 degrees which may indicate that it did not just break lose from the tug/aircraft during the tow.

     

    The photo below show the position of the tug and the tow bar (just in front of the right hand wheels).

     

    EQKTpJ8XUAIOKnR.jpg.982f048a4943aa5a31adcf5e54f12769.jpg

    • Like 1
  5. 28 minutes ago, yogavnture said:

    the most shocking thing is that only a couple of vehicles around the incident.  dont most airports have full time fire rescue..........?  i dont see any of that around the incident.  what if a real big incident happens at don mueng.  will their be a response or only police in a pick up truck?

    As stated in the above post, some bad reporting by the Nation.

    Within a few minutes of the incident occurring at 08:00am the plane was surrounded by emergency vehicles as may be seen below.

    BBZKa7i.jpg.47701f8bb2df3305304573512348a5ed.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. On ‎2‎/‎1‎/‎2020 at 10:57 PM, BritTim said:

    Yes, there are discrepancies in his timeline. Issues started about a year ago, he left for half a year, returning on visa exempt + extension, then court proceedings lasted eight months. Everything more or less lines up if court proceedings lasted six months. I suspect a sloppy post rather than deliberate misinformation, but cannot be sure.

    Tim…. I think that you are being very generous when you say, “I suspect sloppy post rather than deliberate misinformation, but cannot be sure”.

     

    As an old fart, I had my annual flue injection a couple of weeks ago and as a result towards the end of last week I’ve have been suffering from mild flue symptoms (no not the corona virus) so stayed at home over the weekend.  I know this will sound sad, but with nothing better to do, I read through the OP’s 222 pervious posts.

     

    Sorry to sound so sceptical, but I believe that there is far more to his ‘story’ than he has revealed in this current thread and I doubt very much that his arrest and possible deportation has anything to do with one day overstay.  

     

    There are far more ‘holes’ in his posts than there are holes in a 'M&S string vest'.  His various stories read like the script from a Thai TV soap.

     

    Obviously he has gone very quiet, possibly if his current story is to be believed, his mobile phone was taken away when he was booked into IDC.  Maybe he will report back once he’s back to France, then again it would not surprise me that he suddenly reappears with a story that he was released from IDC because Immigration had made a terrible mistake.

     

    Maybe a case of watch this space for the next intriguing episode.

    • Thanks 1
  7. On ‎2‎/‎2‎/‎2020 at 10:10 AM, Pib said:

    So, where you say they inserted" your card which implies the card has a chip, maybe you really meant they "swiped" the card or maybe you really didn't see how they used the machine to read the card....that is, inserted or swiped it....you just know they used a machine to read the card.

    FYI.... I am fairly tech savey, and know the difference between a card being swiped and inserted.  Also, with 20/20 vision and being only a few feet away from the cashier, I was clearly able to observe what she did with my pink card, and I can 100% confirm that she inserted the card into a card reader on her desk.

     

    I have investigated the data held on my pink card magnetic strip (using a swipe reader linked to my desktop PC) and only track 1 is used, and that only contains the 13 digit ID number.  There is no other data held on the magnetic stripe.

     

    If you do a search on Google (Magnetic card readers) you will find that most devices are of the swipe type but there are some that are insert only.

     

    23 hours ago, Pib said:

    That is true....forgot all about that. The swiping motion is done when the machine sucks the card in. 

     

    It's just I never seen such a machine that a checkout clerk uses....they have always manually swiped the card through their machine....or sometimes located on the checkout clerk's monitor....or sometimes on a keyboard like at a bank.   Like at Bangkok Bank I sometimes go in to transfer money from an acct that requires me to physically visit the branch to do a transfer (it's a special direct deposit acct for US govt payments) to another acct.  In order to complete the transfer the bank clerk "swipes" his/her employee card thru a reader on their keyboard and then continues the transfer.

    Also, many hotels these days use access cards for guests to open the door to their room.  These cards, more often than not, have a magnetic stipe on the rear which when inserted into the door device is read and if the data on the stripe is correct the door is opened.  Again, these devices tend to only use track 1 of the magnetic stripe so can be fairly easily cloned.

  8. 1 hour ago, Yadon Toploy said:

    The 330e is not a model listed for sale in Thailand as far as I can see. Where did you get your information?

    Simple Google search "Thailand BMW 330e list price" will reveal several examples.  I have attached below the price list from BMW.co.tha which is dated Feb. 2019 and I've highlighted the cheapest 330e model.

     

    FYI.... I first spotted three of these parked outside of my local Immigration office a year ago (22/01/19 to be precise) so they must have been ordered quite some time before then.  I have also noted from the Google search that one 2nd hand site has 66 of this model available, so they have been in Thailand for some time.

    price-list-2019-02-01.pdf

  9. 4 hours ago, ianezy0 said:

    BMW’s are made locally in Rayong

    If your statement is correct, then perhaps the car shown in the initial post was made just before, or more likely just after a long holiday when the level of alcohol in the system was still high.

    Untitled.jpg.cf11722685c566512d260339081575da.jpg

    Note the position of the steering wheel on the left.  Of course it could have been MIC and someone forgot to specify the steering wheel on the right.

     

    I hope that they have disarmed the front passenger airbag.  If not the passenger will get more than a 'face plant' from the laptop if the vehicle is involved in a front end collision.

    • Like 1
  10. 3 hours ago, VYCM said:

    The SMART immigration vehicles are series 5

    Sorry to correct you, but the so called SMART cars used by Immigration are not Series 5 BMWs..... Just been to my local Immigration office (Nakhon Pathom) for 90 day reporting and there parked outside the office was one of the three cars which are normally based there.  As you will see they are Series 330e models.

    20200129_125643-iv.jpg

    FYI... Current list price of the 330e is 2,300,000 THB including taxes.

  11. 4 hours ago, SupermarineS6B said:

    Do you honestly think they would report an outbreak ?    Me thinks not......

    I agree 100% with your observation.  There's no way that they (Thai authorities) will ever admit an outbreak of the coronavirus, that would be a total 'loss of face'.  What I do expect to see in the next week or so is a big announcement by one of the universities that the have just discovered a wonder vaccine to cure the coronavirus, just like they did for MERS and Ebola.

    • Haha 1
  12. Quote:

     

    "Of the people found to be in close contact with the infected persons -- 16 persons with the first patient and 20 with the second -- none were found with the new strains of the coronavirus. 

     

    There are no concerns yet of an outbreak in Thailand".

     

    Exactly how did the authorities establish that none of the 36 people who had been in 'close contact' with the 2 infected people did not have the new strain of the coronavirus ?

     

    If the above mentioned 36 people were in close proximity during the 2 or 3 hour flight from China to the persons who have been confirmed as having the virus, then they are not gong to show any signs or symptoms of the virus after such a short period of time.  According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), the incubation period (time from initial contact to showing signs/symptoms) for the coronavirus is anywhere between 4 and 14 days.

     

    So the authorities have let 36 potential carriers of the virus into the Kingdom and have clearly stated that "there are no concerns yet of an outbreak in Thailand".  Wait for another 1 or 2 weeks and then see if any more cases are reported.

    • Like 1
  13. 1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

    *Regarding the Driving license - I’ve read (on this forum) that some DLT’s do not accept the Yellow House Book as proof of address... this would be rather frustrating after jumping through hoops.

     

    Has anyone renewed their Driving Licence at the DLT in Bangkok (Area 3, next to 99 Sukhumvit rd) using their Yellow house book as proof of address ????

    I renewed my 5 year licence in September last year at the DLT HQ near Mo Chit.  I went there a few day before to enquire what documents they required.  The reception staff on the 2nd floor of building No. 4 where the licences are issued were very helpful, albeit with limited English.

     

    As well as copies of my passport photo page and visa stamp, they stated that I needed to provide either a letter from Immigration or my embassy confirming my address.  I informed them that I had a yellow book and pink card and enquired if these were acceptable as proof of my address.  They advised that if my current driving licence showed my name in English and my passport number on it then the yellow book/pink card would not be accepted for renewing my licence.  They said that this is because my name in the yellow book was in Thai and they (DLT) are not authorised/qualified to authenticate the translation between the English on the original licence and the Thai in the yellow book.

     

    They did say that if I was applying for a licence for the first time, then the yellow book would be accepted and my name and address would appear on the licence in Thai. 

    • Like 2
  14. 18 hours ago, Maestro said:

     

    I believe the MFA does not verify the translation but it authenticates the signature of the translator.

    FYI.... The MFA, Consular Division, Legalisation Department do in fact verify the translation be it from English to Thai or visa a versa.  The whole purpose of having a document legalised is to certify that the translations is accurate.

     

    I recall many years ago when Miss MoneyBaht and I were getting married in Bangkok, I needed to get various documents translated from English to Thai and then have them legalised by MFA.  MFA rejected one of the documents because the translation from the original English to Thai was incorrect.  Fortunately it was not a 'show stopper' as we used the translation shop located on the 2nd floor and they corrected the error within a few minutes.  MFA then stamped their red 'seal' on each document (including the original English) and we were ready to go. 

     

    I think that you are confusing the situation when some people (myself included) who were supplied with embassy letters confirming their income in order to support their extension of permission to stay were instructed by some immigration offices to have the letter certified by MFA.  In these cases MFA obviously could not verify the details contained within the embassy letter, but what they did do was to verify that the signature of the embassy officer on the letter was authentic and they put a sticker on the back of the embassy letter confirming that the signature was authentic.

×
×
  • Create New...