-
Posts
926 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by 007 RED
-
-
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, murikamba said:My question is how do I know if they have linked my passport or not?
OP…. Do a simple test for yourself. Open your 2 passports at the photo page, then look at the bottom of the pages at the information typed between <<<< >>>> and see how long it takes you to spot the difference.
I would guess it took you about 5 seconds to identify that the 3 letters of your ‘country codes’ (USA – KOR) and your passport numbers and expiry dates are different. Apart from that, both passports will have the same family name, first names, date of birth (in reverse order) and gender code (M or F).
When you hand your passport to the Immigration Officer at the port of entry, he/she places you’re the photo page onto a desktop scanner which read the information at the bottom of the page between <<<< >>>> just like you did manually.
So, when you presented your Korean passport on your first entry into the Kingdom the Immigration system would not have found any entry of that passport number in the database. The system would then do a secondary check using your gender code, date of birth and names.
As this was your first entry into the Kingdom there would be no record of you in the Immigration database and the system would then add your biographical information to the database.
When you presented your USA passport to the Immigration Officer on your second entry into the Kingdom the same process as I have described above would have automatically taken place. Initially the system will identify that your USA passport number is not known to the database but when it does the second stage search it will recognise a match to your Korean passport (gender code, date of birth, and names). The system will have established the possible link between the 2 passports within a couple of seconds.
You will be unaware of the fact that the Immigration Officer will have a ‘new/second passport flag’ displayed on his/her computer screen. On clicking on the flag, the Officer will be shown the photos of you which the system obtained from the chips that are embedded in your 2 passports, together with your biographical details. The Officer does a quick visual comparison of the photos and biographical data and if he/she satisfied that both passports belong to you he/she simply clicks on the button that then links the 2 passports. The Immigration Officer will not normally tell you that he/she is aware that you have 2 passports as it is not illegal to hold 2 passports.
Because your two passports are then linked in the Thai Immigration system, each time you present either passport to the Immigration Officer when you enter the Kingdom, the Immigration Officer will be aware that you have 2 passports and have access to your complete entry/exit history.
When will you know if your passports are linked? As has been indicated in post #18, when the Immigration Officer asks you "Why are you spending so much time in the kingdom as a 'tourist'?"
-
8
-
5
-
2 hours ago, CGW said:
The Pilot is the only person permitted to "drive" the plane when being towed so obviously he was in "control" of the brakes, the vehicle doing the towing was in "command"
A 'pilot', as in a person who is licenced to fly that particular type of aircraft does not need to be in the cockpit when an aircraft does not have any passengers on board, is not under power and being towed, as in this case from a remote parking stand to the terminal building.
It is perfectly acceptable for a member of the ground staff to be sitting in the left hand (pilot's) seat provided that that person has been trained and certified to undertake the task.
Normally that person will be a technician and their function will be to start up the Auxiliary Power Unit to provide electrical power for lights (when necessary) and for the electric motor which provided the necessary pressure for the hydraulic systems (brakes). He is also responsible for releasing and applying the parking brake, checking the hydraulic pressure gauges and maintaining a lookout during the tow.
Braking during towing is normally the responsibility of the tug driver. This has to be done very gradually as a sudden or sharp braking can lead to the nose wheel assembly being damaged.
Depending upon individual protocols, either the tug driver or the person in the left hand seat will be solely responsible for communications with ATC to obtain clearance for ground movements etc. In the case where the person in the left hand seat is responsible for ATC comms, the tug driver must have facilities to overhear these comms.
The person in the left hand seat is not responsible for steering the plane whilst the tow bar is attached, that is the sole responsibility of the tug driver.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
MODS..... Please Please keep a check on this thread and remove ASAP any videos of people being shot etc which are appearing on Facebook and other online media.
This is turning out to be another incident like New Zealand.
-
4
-
2 minutes ago, Brigand said:
My Mrs says he's posting on Facebook whilst he's doing this ... an example of it is a post about him saying his trigger finger is getting tired. Geez man ... not good.
Mrs MoneyBaht reports the same.... he's streaming live on Facebook... now reports 14 dead and many wounded.
-
32 minutes ago, Scott Tracy said:
An unfortunate incident.
Comments have been made that the report 'incorrectly states' that the aircraft was being towed to a disembarkation point. I don't know if the report is true or if the commenters are correct.
I cannot see passengers or steps in place in the photographs.
One commenter says a tow bar break is a rare occurrence, which, in my experience, it is. But it does happen. There is a shear pin in the bar, designed to break before tug pulls the nose landing gear off the aircraft.
There is normally a person on the flight deck, briefed to operate the brakes. Tug drivers normally signal by horn toots. It does help enormously if the brake system is presurised. Pumping and releasing the brakes on an aircraft a couple of times will depressurise the system, unless the system is kept pressurised.
The tug driver may well have signalled the brake man on the flight deck and expected the aircraft to stop.
When I was learning tug driving, I was told if the pin breaks, if it's a push, stop, if it's a pull, drive away in the direction of travel if you can. In both cases, blowing the horn, or shouting or both, so the brake person can see whatever is happening.
RIP tug driver.
Scott, I agree with your comments but having seen the video of this incident several times this morning on various TV news channels I have a horrible feeling that the tug was possibly exceeding the speed limits for a manoeuvre he was about to make.
The plane was being towed from its remote overnight stand along taxiway K and was due to make a left turn onto taxiway H. From the video, it looks to me as though tug and plane were moving fairly quickly along the straight taxiway (K) and the tug driver left his braking very late to slow the palne down before making the left hand turn. The 66 Ton aircraft appears to push the tug as the tug begins the left hand turn. The momentum of the aircraft would want to continue in a straight line but the tow bar would have prevented this and the plane can be seen to suddenly swing left. It almost looks like the tug and plane 'jack knifed' causing the tug to stop and the plane then rolling over the tug. The tug is seen on several photos wedged under the left hand side of the aircraft fuselage.
Other photos that I have seen show the tow bar is intact but completely removed from the tug and the aircraft and it is bent at about a 30 degrees which may indicate that it did not just break lose from the tug/aircraft during the tow.
The photo below show the position of the tug and the tow bar (just in front of the right hand wheels).
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, yogavnture said:
the most shocking thing is that only a couple of vehicles around the incident. dont most airports have full time fire rescue..........? i dont see any of that around the incident. what if a real big incident happens at don mueng. will their be a response or only police in a pick up truck?
As stated in the above post, some bad reporting by the Nation.
Within a few minutes of the incident occurring at 08:00am the plane was surrounded by emergency vehicles as may be seen below.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Burma Bill said:Your correct, aircraft that are arriving do not have a tug to tow them to the stand.
Sorry, but whoever wrote this article for the Nation is a complete and utter plonker and need to get their facts straight before committing 'pen to paper'.
The accident happened at 08:00am local time. The aircraft did not have any passengers on board as it was being towed from the remote overnight parking bay to terminal 2 gate where it would be made ready for a flight. The flight in question as quoted by Nation was as Nok DD6458 scheduled to depart Don Mueang at 08:40 for Nakhon Si Thammarat.
Also the aircraft involved in this incident would not have been allowed to fly straight away, again a bit of fake reporting, as the damage would need to be thoroughly examined and repaired. The flight (DD6458) did take off about an hour late, but a replacement aircraft was used.
R.I.P. young man.
-
3
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
40 minutes ago, SpanishExpat said:That fact isn`t true.
You agree that there is no direct flight to Athens, so I take it that you think that arranging a flights to Athens via indirect carriers is not going to be a problem.
Under the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) rules governing the removal of deportation of persons, only the national carrier is obliged to return the individual to their home country. In this particular case Olympic Airways does not fly into Bangkok so an alternative carrier who is willing to transport the deportee needs to be found.
If the national carrier does not fly to/from the country which is deporting the individual, then the ICAO rules indicate that the deporting authority may request that a carrier who flies a direct route from the country deporting the individual back to their home country to provide transport. If there is no direct route carrier, the deporting authority may request none-direct carriers to facilitate transport of the person being deported.
In the case of a national carrier, they have no option but to provide transport if they fly the route in question. However, in the case of a none-national carrier who flies a direct route, or a carrier(s) who fly a none-direct route, they are under no obligation to transport a deportee.
You will find that most of the major ME operators are well known in the aviation industry for refusing to carry deportees because of: a) the legal obligations that are then placed upon them by doing so and b) the additional costs incurred in providing secure arrangements for the deportee during transit.
Hence my comment that the IDC appointed 'travel agent' will have to negotiate with the carrier(s) in order to acquire transport for the deportee. Not impossible but it will be difficult.
FYI.... ICAO is run under the authority of the United Nations. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) (which most airlines belong to) follow the ICAO (UN) guidelines governing the transportation of deportees.
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
17 hours ago, daveAustin said:Any update, op?
If he has been transported from Phuket up to IDC in Bangkok, then the moment he was booked into IDC his mobile phone will have been taken away. It will be returned when he eventually boards his flight out of the Kingdom. So for now he can only communicate with the outside world via payphones which are available within IDC.
His first, and highest, priority will be to arrange, and pay, for a flight back to his home country - it is extremely unlikely that Immigration will allow him to fly to anywhere else e.g. a neighbouring country.
As @mtls2005 has indicated above, there are no direct flights from Bangkok to Athens and this will necessitate the IDC assigned 'travel agent' negotiating with two (or more) airlines to accept the OP for transportation.
Hopefully he will provide some feedback when he get back home.
-
4
-
On 2/1/2020 at 10:57 PM, BritTim said:
Yes, there are discrepancies in his timeline. Issues started about a year ago, he left for half a year, returning on visa exempt + extension, then court proceedings lasted eight months. Everything more or less lines up if court proceedings lasted six months. I suspect a sloppy post rather than deliberate misinformation, but cannot be sure.
Tim…. I think that you are being very generous when you say, “I suspect sloppy post rather than deliberate misinformation, but cannot be sure”.
As an old fart, I had my annual flue injection a couple of weeks ago and as a result towards the end of last week I’ve have been suffering from mild flue symptoms (no not the corona virus) so stayed at home over the weekend. I know this will sound sad, but with nothing better to do, I read through the OP’s 222 pervious posts.
Sorry to sound so sceptical, but I believe that there is far more to his ‘story’ than he has revealed in this current thread and I doubt very much that his arrest and possible deportation has anything to do with one day overstay.
There are far more ‘holes’ in his posts than there are holes in a 'M&S string vest'. His various stories read like the script from a Thai TV soap.
Obviously he has gone very quiet, possibly if his current story is to be believed, his mobile phone was taken away when he was booked into IDC. Maybe he will report back once he’s back to France, then again it would not surprise me that he suddenly reappears with a story that he was released from IDC because Immigration had made a terrible mistake.
Maybe a case of watch this space for the next intriguing episode.
-
1
-
-
On 2/2/2020 at 10:10 AM, Pib said:
So, where you say they inserted" your card which implies the card has a chip, maybe you really meant they "swiped" the card or maybe you really didn't see how they used the machine to read the card....that is, inserted or swiped it....you just know they used a machine to read the card.
FYI.... I am fairly tech savey, and know the difference between a card being swiped and inserted. Also, with 20/20 vision and being only a few feet away from the cashier, I was clearly able to observe what she did with my pink card, and I can 100% confirm that she inserted the card into a card reader on her desk.
I have investigated the data held on my pink card magnetic strip (using a swipe reader linked to my desktop PC) and only track 1 is used, and that only contains the 13 digit ID number. There is no other data held on the magnetic stripe.
If you do a search on Google (Magnetic card readers) you will find that most devices are of the swipe type but there are some that are insert only.
23 hours ago, Pib said:That is true....forgot all about that. The swiping motion is done when the machine sucks the card in.
It's just I never seen such a machine that a checkout clerk uses....they have always manually swiped the card through their machine....or sometimes located on the checkout clerk's monitor....or sometimes on a keyboard like at a bank. Like at Bangkok Bank I sometimes go in to transfer money from an acct that requires me to physically visit the branch to do a transfer (it's a special direct deposit acct for US govt payments) to another acct. In order to complete the transfer the bank clerk "swipes" his/her employee card thru a reader on their keyboard and then continues the transfer.
Also, many hotels these days use access cards for guests to open the door to their room. These cards, more often than not, have a magnetic stipe on the rear which when inserted into the door device is read and if the data on the stripe is correct the door is opened. Again, these devices tend to only use track 1 of the magnetic stripe so can be fairly easily cloned.
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, tcp7 said:Okay guys, the plot thickens, have a good read:
Today after leaving the court we got a copy of the original verdict hand signed and stamped by the judge himself.
While I cannot read anything in Thai myself I forwarded it to a trusted translator for the French Embassy and she was baffled.
According to her, one paragraph reads word for word that I am a FREE man and am FREE to go wherever I please.
Yet these 3 immigration officers are forcibly escorting me to the IDC!?!?!
Is this an abuse of power?They are working on their own agenda here and clearly not following the orders of the court.
I need a lawyer, and I need one RIGHT NOW!!!
OP…. According to your original post you stated:
“Fast forward to yesterday morning, the case has ran it’s course, the judge gave his final verdict which is as follows:
Since it is a minor offense, it is my first offense in Thailand and due to my health condition, the judge sentenced me 2 years of probation or a suspended sentence (I’m not sure what the difference is)”.
I believe from what you have stated that you were in fact sentenced to 2 years’ probation, but that the sentence has been suspended. It is noted that there is no mention as to how long the suspension period is.
What this means that that if you come before a Court again (for any reason) during the suspension period, that Court will impose the original Court sentence of 2 years’ probation or possibly change the sentence to something harsher. However, if after 2 years you have not been in any trouble that original sentence will not be applied.
Because you were given a suspended sentence, I suspect that is why the interpretation of the Court ruling indicates that you are “Free man and FREE to go”.
That said someone (police/immigration) has determined that your presence in the Kingdom is no longer desirable and decided that you should be deported.
The Deportation Act B.E. 2499, Section 6, allows that whilst applying for a deportation order a police office can arrest and detain the person subject to the provisions of the Criminal Code. So this means that they can detain you in a place of their choice, which seems in your case to be IDC in Bangkok whilst they make the application for deportation.
The deportation process is not down to the local police/immigration officer. They must submit a report to the regional commander stating what you have done and why deportation is deemed necessary. They can also recommend that if deportation is granted the you should be banned for a specified period from entering the Kingdom after deportation.
I suspect that they will quote from Section 5 of the Deportation Act B.E. 2499, namely: “… necessary in the interest of public peace and order or morals,….”
If the regional commander agrees with the request/report, he/she must forward the deportation application/report to the Head of Royal Thai Police for consideration. Again, if the Head of RTP agrees, he must submit the endorsed application/report to the Minister of the Interior for consideration.
It is the Minister of the Interior who will sign the deportation order and impose any ban if he agrees with the request. He can also deny the request and order that you be released.
If the Minister signs the deportation order, you will be given a copy of that order and you will have 7 days from the day you receive the order in which to lodge an appeal.
If you do not lodge an appeal, they (immigration) still cannot deport you until 15 day as elapsed after you receive the deportation order.
If you appeal it will be considered by the President of the Council of Ministers (PM) who can uphold, or cancel, the Minister’s deportation decision.
In my opinion the process of obtaining a deportation order is very much a ‘rubber stamp’ exercise and in order to make an appeal you are going to need a very good and expensive lawyer.
I see from your latest post that you say a member of your Embassy will visit you on Monday. Please don't hold out to much hope that they are going to offer a lot of help. The same applies to all Embassies, they cannot interfere in the legal process of the host country. I suspect all they will be able to do is put you in contact with a Bangkok based lawyer. As I said earlier, he/she will have to be very good and that comes at a price.
The very best of luck.
-
5
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The sale of poppy's in and around Bangkok at this time of the year is perfectly OK. Happens every year at about this time.
In the UK most people wear a poppy for Remembrance Day in November each year to commemorate the ending of WW1. The funds raised by the sale of poppy's goes to Royal British Legion (RBL) who use the funds to help support ex-service personnel in need throughout the world.
Thailand has a similar scheme which they call Veterans Day. This will be held on the 3rd February this year. There will be a service of remembrance at Victory Monument in Bangkok. The Thai poppy's are a little different from those available in the UK and the money raised goes to the War Veterans Organisation of Thailand (equivalent of RBL) to help ex-service personnel.
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
17 hours ago, Hiambruno said:The plan is to leave to Bangkok IDC and wait there that will take from 4 days to 2 weeks ..
OP….. From your comment that, “the plan is to leave for Bangkok IDC and wait there that will take from 4 days to 2 weeks..” I take it that Immigration has decided that you are going to be deported.
Firstly, you may well find that you will be in Phuket for some time. Immigration will need to arrange for you to be transported from Phuket up to Bangkok. This will involve arranging for a vehicle and officers to accompany you for the 12 hour road trip. Don’t expect a luxury sedan to take you, it will more than likely be a wire caged pickup with you sitting in the flatbed.
Secondly, it is quite possible that they (Phuket Immigration) may well wait until they have several people that need to be transported to Bangkok, so this will also affect the time you will be in Phuket.
That said, enjoy your time there in Phuket because where you’re going is not going to be so pleasant.
When you arrive at the IDC in Bangkok you will be ‘booked in” and all your personal possessions such as your phone, laptop, camera, money etc. will be taken away from you. You will get these back when you are taken to the airport. They will allow you to keep a limited quantity of clothing and toiletries.
If you have any medical issues, or need medication, make sure you tell them when you arrive at the IDC.
You will be allocated to a room within the centre and given a blanket and hard pillow. The room normally holds 50 or more people at any one time. There are no beds, you will sleep on the floor in very cramped conditions. The room has overhead fans but no air conditioning so during the day it can be very hot and at night quite cold. There is a swat toilet at one end of the room. The smell in the room can be overpowering to say the least.
You will be given 2 very basic meals a day and drinking water whilst you are being held in the centre. If you have money when you arrive you can ask that some, or all, be credited to your account. You can then use this to purchase better food and additional drinking water through the guards.
There are pay phones in IDC, and you will need to arrange to use one and pay with credit from your account.
Whatever you do, comply with instructions/orders given by the guards.
IDC will inform your Embassy that you are being detained there whilst arrangements are made for your deportation. Don’t expect your Embassy to come running to your rescue, they won’t because they can not interfere with the ‘lawful process’. Your Embassy will only make sure that if you need medication you are provided with it and they will also arrange for your relatives to be notified if you want them to. Embassies generally will not provide funds to you. They may, however, arrange for money sent from a relative to be credited to your account in IDC if required. Some Embassies make a charge for this service.
You can have visitors whilst you are in IDC. However, Immigration will only allow your close relative, legal representative or Embassy Officer to visit you in IDC. Your visitor will need to register with IDC prior to their arrival and if allowed in you and your visitor will be separated by dual fences about 1 meter apart in an open yard. Your visitor can bring food, water, clothing for you. They can also deposit money into your credit account.
Whilst you are in IDC, Immigration will carry out a risk assessment on you. This will be based upon your conduct whilst you are in the IDC. Provided that you have behave yourself they will allow you to fly back home unaccompanied. If you are involved in any problems or disobey orders given to you whilst you’re in IDC they (Immigration) may decide that you need to be escorted during your return flight(s) and you will have to pay for the escort’s return flights and accommodation as well as your own flight costs.
IDC will arrange for a travel agent to book your flight out of the Kingdom. This will be to your home country and you will have to pay the cost of the flight.
Immigration normally require that your flight is a direct flight. If there are no direct flights to your home country then the travel agent will need to seek consent from both Immigration and the airlines involved for you to travel before a booking can be made and this can sometime take a few days.
You need to be aware that a single flight ticket often costs as much, if not more, than a return flight ticket. Also, flights purchased at relatively short notice are usually very expensive. You will pay for your flight with money in your IDC credit account, or with your credit card if you have one.
If you already have a return ticket (to your home country), this can be used as part payment toward your new ticket, regardless if it is, or is not, with the same airline. This may reduce the cost of the new ticket but not by a lot as there is normally a heavy penalty to pay when changing flights and dates etc.
Don’t expect that your outbound flight will be the day after you pay for the flight. It is more than likely to be a week or more after payment has been made. Once again Immigration will need time to arrange transport and escorts to take you from IDC to the airport. Also, they (Immigration) try to arrange to transport for several people to the airport at one time. You may well be charged for the transport and escort costs.
Prior to being taken to the airport you will be given back your possessions which were removed when you were booked into IDC, and any money still in your credit account.
When you are taken to the airport you will be taken to the airport detention facility where you will wait for your flight. This facility will seem like a 5 star hotel compared to IDC. An airline representative will come to the detention facility to ‘check you in’.
Just prior to normal passenger boarding you will be taken to the gate by security staff and handed over to the airline staff. The airline staff will keep your passport until you disembark at your home destination.
Please be aware that your passport will have a nice red stamp indicating that you have been deported from Thailand and the reason why (this will be in Thai). It is also possible that the deportation stamp will be accompanied by a second stamp stating that you have been banned from entering the Kingdom for whatever period has been set by Immigration.
You need to also be aware that Thai Immigration will notify their counterparts in your home country that you have been deported, the reason why and your flight details, so it is possible that you may have a welcoming committee waiting for you when you arrive back home.
Best of luck.
-
5
-
6
-
- Popular Post
I go to Ramathibodi (Government) Hospital in Bangkok for dental treatment and periodic checks for eye fluid pressure. When I first attended the hospital (a number of years ago) Mrs MoneyBaht had me registered there using my 'pink card'. Because she was a Government Officer (now retired) it transpires that I am entitled to a reduction in the cost of treatment at Government Hospitals.
When I give my treatment invoice to the cashier I also hand her my pink card which she inserts into what looks like a desktop 'credit card' machine. A few seconds later the machine produces a receipt (again which looks just like a CC receipt) and this shows my 'pink card id number (6 738x xxxx0 08 0) and the gross cost of the invoice.
A few seconds later the cashier's printer produces my final bill showing the gross cost of treatment, the discount and the final amount due. After payment the cashier gives me back the original invoice, the receipt from the CC type machine (as above) and a payment receipt.
At no time during the payment process does the cahier use her keyboard, so I would assume that the payment process is activated by her inserting my pink card into her desktop machine which reads the magnetic strip on the reverse of the card (just like the CC machines did before having a chip embedded).
FYI..... I also note that if I pay using a credit card the cashier uses a different machine to the one she used for my pink card.
-
1
-
3
-
1 hour ago, Yadon Toploy said:
The 330e is not a model listed for sale in Thailand as far as I can see. Where did you get your information?
Simple Google search "Thailand BMW 330e list price" will reveal several examples. I have attached below the price list from BMW.co.tha which is dated Feb. 2019 and I've highlighted the cheapest 330e model.
FYI.... I first spotted three of these parked outside of my local Immigration office a year ago (22/01/19 to be precise) so they must have been ordered quite some time before then. I have also noted from the Google search that one 2nd hand site has 66 of this model available, so they have been in Thailand for some time.
-
4 hours ago, ianezy0 said:
BMW’s are made locally in Rayong
If your statement is correct, then perhaps the car shown in the initial post was made just before, or more likely just after a long holiday when the level of alcohol in the system was still high.
Note the position of the steering wheel on the left. Of course it could have been MIC and someone forgot to specify the steering wheel on the right.
I hope that they have disarmed the front passenger airbag. If not the passenger will get more than a 'face plant' from the laptop if the vehicle is involved in a front end collision.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, VYCM said:
The SMART immigration vehicles are series 5
Sorry to correct you, but the so called SMART cars used by Immigration are not Series 5 BMWs..... Just been to my local Immigration office (Nakhon Pathom) for 90 day reporting and there parked outside the office was one of the three cars which are normally based there. As you will see they are Series 330e models.
FYI... Current list price of the 330e is 2,300,000 THB including taxes.
-
4 hours ago, SupermarineS6B said:
Do you honestly think they would report an outbreak ? Me thinks not......
I agree 100% with your observation. There's no way that they (Thai authorities) will ever admit an outbreak of the coronavirus, that would be a total 'loss of face'. What I do expect to see in the next week or so is a big announcement by one of the universities that the have just discovered a wonder vaccine to cure the coronavirus, just like they did for MERS and Ebola.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, sencelebi said:What that camera does on top of the roof, face recognition or what?
Spot on.... The camera on the top of the car, behind the emergency light bar, is a Tilt, Pan, Zoom camera which is linked to a computer mounted in the boot of the vehicle. The computer is linked via WiFi to the new Immigration facial recognition database.
These cars have been deployed for quite some time. I first spotted 3 of them parked in my local Immigration office (Nakhon Pathom) in January 2019 when I did my 90 day reporting. I have subsequently seen them parked outside the local big factories who employ a large number of migrant workers as the shifts are about to change.
During a recent visit to my local Immigration office I spoke to one of the IOs who was about to get into one of the vehicles. He was happy to show me the system and agreed to do a demo with me as a possible 'suspect'. I walked about 150 meters from the car and then turned around. According to my wife who was watching the demo in the car, my photo and details came up on the computer screen within a matter of seconds after I turned around and my face was picked out by the camera. The picture and details on the screen were from my passport and the IO was then able to 'drill down' to my history.
As well as the facial recognition system, the IO also has access to a passport scanner (like those used at boarder entry/exit point) so that they can put the photo page of your passport onto it and read the data held on the microchip that is embedded within the passport to check if the passport is real or fake.
I totally agree with many previous posters, using 300 series BMW is somewhat over the top. A bog standard pickup would have done the same thing at a fraction of the cost. I know, there is unlikely to be worthwhile kickbacks from purchasing pickups.
-
4
-
Quote:
"Of the people found to be in close contact with the infected persons -- 16 persons with the first patient and 20 with the second -- none were found with the new strains of the coronavirus.
There are no concerns yet of an outbreak in Thailand".
Exactly how did the authorities establish that none of the 36 people who had been in 'close contact' with the 2 infected people did not have the new strain of the coronavirus ?
If the above mentioned 36 people were in close proximity during the 2 or 3 hour flight from China to the persons who have been confirmed as having the virus, then they are not gong to show any signs or symptoms of the virus after such a short period of time. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), the incubation period (time from initial contact to showing signs/symptoms) for the coronavirus is anywhere between 4 and 14 days.
So the authorities have let 36 potential carriers of the virus into the Kingdom and have clearly stated that "there are no concerns yet of an outbreak in Thailand". Wait for another 1 or 2 weeks and then see if any more cases are reported.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
12 hours ago, bbi1 said:How many past entries into Thailand do IO's see on their screen at the airport when they scan your passport? Is it true that they can only see two previous entries into the country?
No, its not true that they can only see details of the past two entries.
Within a fraction of a second of the IO placing your passport onto the small scanner on their desk he/she will have your biographical details (which are held on the microchip that is embedded in the passport) displayed on their screen. The biographical details are the same as you see on the photo page e.g. names, date of birth, gender etc. FYI - Your photo which is also embedded on the 'chip' has been enhanced by your passport issuing authority in order to facilitate facial recognition if available.
This is why you will often see an IO holding the photo page along side his/her screen and comparing the details and the likeness of the photo shown in your passport with that shown on their screen against you.
Your entry/exit history is not automatically shown on the initial screen. If the IO wants to look at your history (maybe because of lots of previous stamps in the passport) he/she has a range of pull down menus available, one of which will display the passport holder's history.
I have seen my immigration computer records, and it goes back to 1992 when I first came to Thailand. It shows date of entry and exit and a code giving the type of visa used. I'm given to understand that at some time in the late 1990s they (Immigration) had a blitz and transferred most of the historical paper records onto their computer system.
-
3
-
1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:
*Regarding the Driving license - I’ve read (on this forum) that some DLT’s do not accept the Yellow House Book as proof of address... this would be rather frustrating after jumping through hoops.
Has anyone renewed their Driving Licence at the DLT in Bangkok (Area 3, next to 99 Sukhumvit rd) using their Yellow house book as proof of address ????
I renewed my 5 year licence in September last year at the DLT HQ near Mo Chit. I went there a few day before to enquire what documents they required. The reception staff on the 2nd floor of building No. 4 where the licences are issued were very helpful, albeit with limited English.
As well as copies of my passport photo page and visa stamp, they stated that I needed to provide either a letter from Immigration or my embassy confirming my address. I informed them that I had a yellow book and pink card and enquired if these were acceptable as proof of my address. They advised that if my current driving licence showed my name in English and my passport number on it then the yellow book/pink card would not be accepted for renewing my licence. They said that this is because my name in the yellow book was in Thai and they (DLT) are not authorised/qualified to authenticate the translation between the English on the original licence and the Thai in the yellow book.
They did say that if I was applying for a licence for the first time, then the yellow book would be accepted and my name and address would appear on the licence in Thai.
-
2
-
-
18 hours ago, Maestro said:
I believe the MFA does not verify the translation but it authenticates the signature of the translator.
FYI.... The MFA, Consular Division, Legalisation Department do in fact verify the translation be it from English to Thai or visa a versa. The whole purpose of having a document legalised is to certify that the translations is accurate.
I recall many years ago when Miss MoneyBaht and I were getting married in Bangkok, I needed to get various documents translated from English to Thai and then have them legalised by MFA. MFA rejected one of the documents because the translation from the original English to Thai was incorrect. Fortunately it was not a 'show stopper' as we used the translation shop located on the 2nd floor and they corrected the error within a few minutes. MFA then stamped their red 'seal' on each document (including the original English) and we were ready to go.
I think that you are confusing the situation when some people (myself included) who were supplied with embassy letters confirming their income in order to support their extension of permission to stay were instructed by some immigration offices to have the letter certified by MFA. In these cases MFA obviously could not verify the details contained within the embassy letter, but what they did do was to verify that the signature of the embassy officer on the letter was authentic and they put a sticker on the back of the embassy letter confirming that the signature was authentic.
How do you know if two Passports are Linked
in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Posted
Sorry, but there is no such facility that will give you, or anyone else, the details of all your past travel by just entering your passport number into a computer app.
The only people (or should I say companies) that would have details of your past individual travel arrangements would be the separate airline/ferry/train companies, with whom you have travelled. This being the case, what you are suggesting is that all these companies’ computer databases are in some way linked and that anyone can just tap in a passport number and see where that person has travelled.
Sorry but not a ‘cat in hells’ chance. Firstly, no travel company is going to share your travel data with their competitors for obvious commercial reasons. Secondly, most countries have data protection laws which limit, if not prevent the sharing of personal data without good or lawful cause. Thirdly, linking all these hundreds of thousands of travel company database throughout the world would be a logistical nightmare and the bandwidth needed to complete just one search would probably bring down the internet
Of course another conspiracy theory is that every countries’ immigration database are linked and that anyone can just enter a person’s passport number and see which countries someone has been too. Again, not a ‘cat in hells’ chance of such a facility existing. Governments do share information for national security reasons but only on a case-by-case basis and they would certainly not give access to such information to any member of the public via an app.
FYI…. I spent over 10 years of my life as a principle co-ordinator on the joint NSA – GCHQ eBorder project following 911. My contribution to this project included overseeing the design, development, testing and installation of various eBorder systems such as machine readable travel documents, ePassports (so called biometric passports) and the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS). Following my retirement from the project I have continued to work with both national security agencies on a consultancy basis and to this date I’ve never seen or heard of such an app as you describe.
If such an app does exist, please share the details as I’m sure every TV member would love to access it.