-
Posts
1,739 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Posts posted by Kelsall
-
-
- Popular Post
There are now reports that instead of dismissing the case immediately, the Senate will hold a full trial should the House submit formal articles of impeachment.
That would be great, watching Schiff, the whistleblower, and Hunter Biden testify. Who knows, they might even call Joe Biden himself.
My guess is because of the above, the House will not submit articles of impeachment.
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
*Yawn* Yet another nothing burger.
No quid pro quo.
- 7
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 11
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Sondland's testimony today along with the resultant false headlines in the media, confirms Trump's contention that this is all a witch hunt orchestrated by the Deep State and fueled by the main stream media. Sondland today made Trump's case. Time to move on, but Schiff and Pelosi will continue down the rabbit hole, most likely to their political demise.
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Once again, a big fat nothing burger.
- 2
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Interesting that in his opening statement Sondland said there was a quid pro quo. Then under questioning he admitted no one on the planet had told him there was a quid pro quo, that he had presumed it, made it up.
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
1 hour ago, keith101 said:
Why not apply for the right visa and just work legally ?
A good question. However I've run into several expats in CM, many actually, over the years who feel the opposite: Why do something legally when the criminal way will work? This includes committing perjury on the old Immigration pension form and scheming to bring in 800k THB in cash, undeclared, when wiring it would work just as well. Not filling out FBAR's on US tax returns, easy to do, but why not break the law if you can.
Looks like "Patricia" got what she deserved.
- 1
-
30 minutes ago, Sheryl said:
Yes CM is saying (and doing) this. So is Jomtien and a number of other places.
How would clarification from CW solve the problem for someone not living in their jurisdiction?
If what you meant was have Imm HQ set the lical office straight, great idea but how does anyone make that happen?
Because in the past one of the experts has used CW as the gold standard for answers on this issue.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Don't the Chinese act like that everywhere they go, all the time?
- 2
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, RoadWarrior371 said:Good weather, Good and Cheap food and living, Women who do not want to be men. Some may ask for variations of the 3rd, if that's your thing ????.
Plenty of women who USED to be men, though.
- 1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Yes, she should resign. Schiff too.
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
58 minutes ago, bristolboy said:Back up to 50% on Rasmussen. Where approval ratings bounce around wildly as in no other poll.
The only poll to correctly a Trump win in 2016.
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Trump did not commit bribery and of course never admitted to bribery. Trump approval is back up to 50% which could not have happened if he were guilty of such crimes.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
Democrats see a lot of things that aren't there.
- 10
- 2
- 1
- 6
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Last year in Chiang Mai the visa service I use told me the best way to get the visa extension was with the 800k method, if you have the money. I had always done the embassy letter but did as she suggested and had no trouble. Others I know did fine with the 800k method, no problems. I know one who had trouble with the 65k route, but was able to get it done eventually after supplying much documentation. Another has had to go out of the country and start over as one of the monthly deposits was not coded as FTT and Immigration wouldn't budge.
So the message from Immigration is clear: Go the 800k route if you have the money.
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
29 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:You have the evidence, Nancy, so do it, stop talking about it and just do it- impeach him- just do it, please, please, please, just do it.
My guess is you won't, because you know what will happen if you do. Nah, you'll just talk and talk and talk till the election.
Agree.
Nancy is in the unenviable position of being damned if you do and damned if you don't. If she does impeach, the Republicans in the Senate will have a field day with this, calling the whistleblower, Biden and his son, and Adam Schiff to name just a few. Also they will drag all this into the primary season where Warren and Sanders will have to be in session instead of campaigning.
If she fails to impeach, the result is this whole mess will be recognized by everyone, even the haters, as the nothing burger it is.
????????????????????????
- 8
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Never seen a statement where Trump admitted to bribery.
Pelosi needs to stay off the bottle.
- 16
- 3
- 6
- 3
- 6
-
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
The witnesses don’t decide what bit is impeachable.
Refer Roger Stone for the Mueller bit.
Meanwhile the hearings reveal more witnesses to Trump’s call.
This is the start of the hearings laying out the background and persons involved.
Nunes’ dumb question is equivalent to asking the prosecution to conclude their case while making opening statements and before all witnesses have been called.
It plays well to people who don’t understand a lot of stuff.
Nov 2016: "Any day now we're going to get Trump."
Nov 2019: "Any day now we're going to get Trump."
- 2
-
23 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:
It was a real car crash of a hearing. I loved it when Nunes asked the 2 neverTrump officials Kent and Taylor where is the impeachable bit. Stone cold silence. Mega cringe! I did not expect the democrat team to be so woefully unprepared and their testimony based on 2nd or even 3rd hand heresay.
Had there been any punches landed we would have a half dozen new threads this morning. Instead it's gone as quiet as the Mueller hoax has. How telling.
And these two witnesses supposedly are the best the Dem's have!
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
17 hours ago, spidermike007 said:
“The two leaders have an affinity for each other as strongman presidents,” said Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, while warning of the deep animosity within the bureaucracies of the two NATO allies.
Very funny. If only Trump was strong. He got played by Putin, Kim, MBS, Xi, and nearly every other politician he has tussled with. He cannot negotiate a deal to save his life. And of course he loves Erdogan. He loves all despots. That is his style. That is the type of leader he would like to be, if he were not reigned in by Congress and various others that provide a modicum of oversight.
Please reread The Art of the Deal.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
After one day of public testimony the preliminary verdict on the "impeachment inquiry" is: Nothing burger.
- 1
- 1
- 4
-
In order to get to the bottom of what happened, Hunter Biden and the whistleblower must testify in public. It's a simple request and if the Dems were playing air, it would happen.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
52 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:The only thing I wonder is if there is a time free the senate must act on if this is passed? Can the senate sit on it until after the election? Also can they just quash it for being invalid with no material witness as the blowing whistler won't appear? We already know this is going nowhere I am just wondering the strategy the reps use.
Could the senate hold a one day trial and take a vote? Otherwise it is obvious it is DOA and the only difference it could make is timing. If I had to guess though there is no way knowing how such things work it will ever be concluded before the election.
Good points. I believe the Senate has a lot of options and could do any of the things you suggest. I would like to see them move slowly, calling the Bidens, Adam Schiff, and the others involved in the coup. That, timed with the indictments provided by Durham and Barr, would provide the leverage to destroy the current communist Democrat party which would be a good thing for America.
- 4
- 1
- 5
-
- Popular Post
This whole thing is already a sham. Schiff's "parody" of the phone call while at the same time claiming the impeachment inquiry is "very serious" proves that.
Pelosi made two big mistakes: One was letting the squad talk her into pursuing an impeachment inquiry and the other putting Adam Schiff in charge.
Get the popcorn...
- 7
- 1
- 3
- 9
-
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, Sujo said:Please do. Please post everything you have posted that is on topic regarding the evidence in the impeachment.
reminder, biden is not the subject of impeachment. Trump is.
There is a lot of information posted on the subject and it can get confusing.
Post #29 gives a detailed explanation of the entire situation and is a short read.
- 1
- 2
Democrats vow to insulate impeachment inquiry from 'sham investigations'
in World News
Posted · Edited by Kelsall
This is what the Pelosi and Schiff have done.