Chomper Higgot

There are very few factual claims in the article, it is almost entirely repeating secondhand opinions. I have outlined two examples of claims in the article that are simply statements with zero backing them up. Feel free to challenge the point I made with respect to either of them.

Of course you can, but don’t claim opinions are facts or that correlation is causation. You yourself stated ‘the article implies’, forgive me for pointing out it does so without providing evidence to backup what it implies.

The article is replete with opinions and juxtaposition of statements with zero evidence of a link, the ‘implying’ you yourself identified. I’ve given you one example, which you have twice failed to address. Now here’s another. “Everything has a price tag,” he explains. “Not just undergraduate degrees; postgraduate degrees as well.” That’s a very serious allegation. No evidence is provided to substantiate it.

I absolutely do not dispute the existence of racism within the sphere of health service provision, it is a problem for the NHS and those that work in the NHS. “The survey [of 77,000 NHS Staff , 220,501 nurses and midwives across 263 NHS organisations] revealed that 14% of nurses and midwives had experienced discrimination at work by the public – the highest level recorded since the question was first asked in 2019.” https://www.nursingtimes.net/workforce/racism-and-violence-against-nhs-staff-continuing-to-rise-13-03-2025/

“Are you saying that people are lying in the article?” Not lying, but the author is definitely disingenuous in their discussion of the subject.

As you rightly said above, ‘the article implies’, it does a lot of implying while providing no ‘apparently available facts’ to substantiate what the article ‘implies’. I’ve given an example above. The ‘fact’ of increased litigation is not an indication of any issues with recruitment, other causes, such as society becoming increasingly litigious might be a cause. So yes you’re correct, ‘implies’ and ‘apparently available facts’ but not actual evidence, nothing that can be actually examined as cause and effect. Though it plays well to some.

Or just through plain prejudice on the part of the author.

It’s left for the fetid imagination of their target audience to make the pejorative assumption. Just as it is with this statement: Absolutely no evidence that the increase in negligence claims has anything at all to do with who’s hired but the suggestion it is seeded into the minds of those eager to believe it is.

How did that workout the last time an Italian got ideas along those lines?

Correct, and add continual exams that must be passed during their medical degree studies, training assessments that must be passed and a medical license that will not be issued unless the applicant had passed all exams and training

Perhaps time for anyone other than the police entering school premises with a gun to be regarded as a legitimate target and shot on sight.

Are you still sticking to your view that the January 25 inflation rate was unacceptably high ?

Once again misrepresenting the facts Jonny. Let’s check the record: https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/updated-sentence-childminder-admits-inciting-racial-hatred-over-social-media-post

I don’t know why you felt the need to make such a declaration.

So how do you know it was him if her was wearing a mask? One of those reports you can’t find?

‘Lawfare’ would imply some semblance of judicial process. You the ‘judicial process’ you expect if ever you are arrested.

It seems this is precisely the Malicious Deep State Trump and his supporters, both foreign and domestic, have been saying is a law unto itself.

It’s arrived already, the accusation of protesters being supporters of Hamas. Laced with conspiracy for good measure.

Can you explain to me what part the UK Home Office plays in prosecuting allegations made in Bangladesh? Give it your best go Jonny.

That cuts both ways.

His removal from the US to El Salvador was in defiance of a court order. Do try to keep up.

Here’s a bit of reading for you: https://clearwaterlawgrouptricities.com/5-rights-of-undocumented-immigrants/ I look forward to you producing credible links to refute my statements and indeed those of the link here attached.

ThT’s nothing more than an admission on your part that you know his deportation was an illegal.

Oh so now ‘Adjudicated’ is guilty. That’s not going to lay well elsewhere. Which clause of the constitution gives the executive the power to ignore a court order?

He was under court orders not the deported: “In October 2019, an immigration judge denied Abrego Garcia’s asylum request but granted him protection from being deported back to El Salvador because of a “well-founded fear” of gang persecution, according to his case. He was released and ICE did not appeal.” https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/article/who-is-kilmar-abrego-garcia-the-man-ice-20265371.php