Chomper Higgot

Ah, yet another personal attack.

Back to the personal attacks I see.

Oh

Well you can always pass time imagining such stuff.

Perhaps the increase of £1Billion on SEND education will factor in the decisions parents make. perhaps too, had funding been maintained since 2010, parents would have had to take their children out of the state schools in the first place.

Which do you object to? The £1Billion increase funding for SEND Pupils is precisely where the critics are complaining the problems will be. The funding increase suggests the Government are targeting this particular educational need. This increase in spending raises the schools budget to, in real terms, just above where it was in 2010, level the last Labour Government achieved and that the Tories chose to let slide despite repeated promises to maintain funding. Also on the way, the roll out of Breakfast Clubs in primary schools. Labour keeping manifesto promises.

Perhaps in some cases that is correct, in all cases? Let us know when you have the actual numbers.

There is a statutory duty for local authorities to provide education for the children within their catchment area. Something else that suffered in the 14 years of Tory austerity.

Thank you for providing an example of Labour dealing with the consequences of the past 14 years of underfunding schools and education.

Firstly can you provide some evidence of what ‘most parents would not willingly choose’? Are you mixing up grammar schools and private schools?

Labour are investing in state schools because they believe in providing a good state education for all children, regardless of the circumstances into which they were born.

You might not like my source, but at least I provided one. Here’s a better idea, increase funding to state schools - Labour are on it.

Here’s a random sky-space shot from an astronomy AP that includes spent rocket boosters floating around in near earth orbit.

Identifying a political leader as ‘the country’, it’s been done before. Never ends well.

They really do deserve each other.

I’m pleased to see you are developing some semblance of self awareness.

Well who saw that coming? Meanwhile he’s apparently warmed to other ideas: https://truthout.org/articles/with-the-campaign-over-donald-trump-now-says-he-likes-parts-of-project-2025/

Well done officers. Nice start to their careers.

Labour doing what is right. On this particular issue it’s clear the wider public agree. I suspect many don’t like the idea of people buying advantage over their own children and doing so free of VAT.

It seems the wider public back Labour in this: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/dec/31/labours-private-school-tax-plan-strongly-backed-by-public-poll-shows

If anyone has any evidence that Majad al Zeer was an attendee at the actual event being discussed in the OP, can they please post it. The US Department of the Treasury has him living in Germany: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2632 https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20241007

Rather suggests that he wasn’t an attendee at this ‘meeting’, though the article itself is not clear on that important point.

To be fair to The Times, they have been transparent stating this poll was conducted on their behalf. Perhaps they’ll pay for another nearer the election.

Unless there is evidence to contradict this statement then it seems the PRC is guilty of not having updated its records at Companies House. They want to give that some attention.

Ah, the personal attacks again.