Chomper Higgot

I read H.R.8282. Tail wagging the dog was my impression.

Voting against a Parliamentary Bill that provides increased protections for children and lying about it. Not a good look. I’m glad I’m not excusing it. Fortunately Labour have a significant majority and the bill passed its second reading.

It seems the lies and misinformation are indeed rife. We've been assailed for days with news of the Tories submitting an amendment to the Second Reading of the Child Welfare and Schools Bill. The fat lie included has been that the Tories were demanding the Bill include setting up an inquiry into the grooming gangs. The liars who spread this nonsense have a couple of problems to navigate. 1. Amendments are not added to Second Readings, the vote is passed the bill into law or ‘kill it’. 2. The text of the Tory ‘amendment’ has been published on ‘’X” The Tories and Reform UK we’re not voting to add an inquiry, they were voting to kill the Child Welfare and Schools Bill. What bunch of stinking liars:

And you don’t meet the height requirement?

It’s pretty obvious he’s trolling.

What’s ‘diversity’ got to do with retirement age? Give it your best go.

That mud you mention obviously got I the way of you understanding this; Anyway thanks for confirming you have zero evidence of me defending these criminals.

Who do I defend? I'm very clear on my support for law, order and prosecuting criminals, regardless of who they are.

Explain this having to work seven years longer claim.

What does the court record say? Check that out, you’ll get the actual facts.

I’ve already commented on the treatment of this child rapists case, I find it baffling and I need of an explanation. I’ve a feeling you are misrepresenting the other case you refer to.

Between the two of you might figure I’m not the topic of the thread.

Struggling with the very easy to use quote function Jonny, or is it just you don’t like presenting my comments in the context they were made, complete with link to a credible news report?

Prosecution of the criminals you choose to defend hasn’t been swift in every case, this criminal has only just been sentenced: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/06/key-architect-of-riots-after-southport-attack-jailed-for-seven-and-a-half-years

I’ll thank you not to attribute views to me that I myself have never expressed.

Quit with the gaslighting, they were race riots. https://www.npr.org/2024/08/08/1196982856/the-root-cause-of-the-race-riots-in-the-uk

This criminal should obviously not be in the UK. How does such a dangerous criminal that was ordered deported after serving his sentence get let out of prison early? There is no logical reason why detention should not have been continued up until placed on the aircraft back to Pakistan. Who was home secretary in 2014… oh it was Theresa May. Perhaps she was too busy at the time decimating the police force.

The cases were each conduced according to the law in open courts taking into account the offenses and circumstances in which they were committed. The Government stamped out wide spread coordinated race riots almost overnight. Text book law and order in practice.

You are obviously not happy that Starmer’s government moved swiftly to quell coordinated violent race riots across the country.

Hardly gaslighting Jonny, I’m simply pointing out your strange conspiracy theory. Incidentally, wasn’t one your past grievances based on your insistence this guy wouldn’t be prosecuted?

Your conspiracy thing is getting the better of you again.

It seems she’s found the most surprising of allies: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/09/uk-is-members-in-syria-should-be-allowed-home-says-trump-counter-terror-pick

I think the Government are entirely right, get the Children’s Bill passed into law.

There you go again with your accusation of lying. Calm down, moderate your language and you might get a discussion.

I think you should stop calling people liars on the basis of a different opinion.