Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Hardly gaslighting Jonny, I’m simply pointing out your strange conspiracy theory. Incidentally, wasn’t one your past grievances based on your insistence this guy wouldn’t be prosecuted?
  2. Your conspiracy thing is getting the better of you again.
  3. It seems she’s found the most surprising of allies: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/09/uk-is-members-in-syria-should-be-allowed-home-says-trump-counter-terror-pick
  4. I think the Government are entirely right, get the Children’s Bill passed into law.
  5. There you go again with your accusation of lying. Calm down, moderate your language and you might get a discussion.
  6. I think you should stop calling people liars on the basis of a different opinion.
  7. What’s actually going on is the Tories trying to delay implementation of the recommendations of the actual inquiry, that they the Tories failed to act upon. Fortunately, Labour have a big enough majority to proceed with the Children’s Bill and ignore the Tories creating a noise to cover their own failing: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgngd52z71o.amp
  8. As in with your name on the title deeds?
  9. You don’t need to lecture me on your new found awareness of the application of the Inquiries Act 2005, it was me who introduced its existence into your awareness.
  10. Odd thing to say given it was you who accused me of being, ‘a breathtaking lack of knowledge’ on this matter. And yet here you are today conceding the points I make on the law and procedure of inquiries. There’s no ‘smug arrogance’ in having read the laws applying to inquiries long before ever commenting on how they proceed.
  11. After the Government had determined exactly what the terms of reference were. Now all you ‘Labour are afraid of something’ merchants have to come up with is some evidence of the Tories setting terms of reference that covered up or avoided exposing Labour misdeeds.
  12. They could have been descendants of those who survived the battle of Towson Moor, on a day trip down south from Doncaster. There’s lots of could have beens, there always is.
  13. I look forward to you producing any evidence of me stating this theft was a positive thing.
  14. It wasn’t Heath’s policies unless you read the history, in particular Heath handing out significant pay rises to some while e forcing pay controls on others.
  15. How am I on the side of the criminals? I’m very much in favor of them receiving the maximum penalty for affray, which I stated above is 3 years in prison. When did I ever suggest they were ‘all white British’? Oh I get it, you’re making stuff up again.
  16. It was fraud. If, having heard the evidence a jury hands down a conviction then why would I object? I’ve never er used an agent to get a visa.
  17. I do support the working man, I also support laws governing financial transactions with banks. I don’t support the grifting recidivist Yaxley-Lennon (beyond that is the tiny fraction of the taxes I pay in UK going towards his upkeep in prison).
  18. The same Elon Musk calling for Farage to be replaced as leader of Reform UK?
  19. No hate crimes are those designated as such in UK law.
  20. He’ll be back: https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1975/en/14739
  21. There you go Jonny, it didn’t take you too long to get back to your habit of misrepresenting the prosecution of online hate crimes.
  22. Immigration status documents are shown? Or is blind assumption on display again?
×
×
  • Create New...