Chomper Higgot

What scum bag causes you choose to defend.

You’ll not provide any post of me being perfectly OK with any such thing Do tell us what your username was the last time the subject came up.

Try not to judge others by your own behavior.

And yet at the top of this thread is a report of Israel committing war crimes and it didn’t come from Hamas.

He’s a witness and he’s reported what he witnessed. It’s aligned with what is reported by others. Now all you have to do is hope no one corroborates his statements.

I’d go find the thread discussing that video just to see what stunts you pulled to ignore it. But honestly it would be a waste of time, you’d come up with some more garbage to deny multiple reports from multiple sources. This thread is a perfect example; a credible eyewitness to the events he reports you respond with obfuscation, dismissal of the witnesses statements, banging on about videos and pretending you don’t know why people are concerned about child victims. Not once have I ever seen any post from you that is in the slightest critical of Israel’s actions. Not once. Your MO is to shill for Israel and its slaughter of innocent civilians. Why do you even bother responding to posts discussing Israel slaughtering innocent Palestinians? You’re not the least bit concerned how many Palestinians are slaughtered by Israel. Your only interest is to parade your mendacity.

Jonny off on his completely off topic Pakistani raid hands fixation… again. “You didn't care about the Pakistani rape gangs, you made excuses for them or denied their crimes.” Utter nonsense Jonny and yet another of your baseless slurs.

The witnesses information was not received from other people, it’s a first hand eyewitness account. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about while being desperate to undermine the report.

I suggest you educate yourself on what ‘hearsay is’ and why an ‘eye witness account’ is ‘not hearsay’. You might also want to look into ‘sworn testimony of eye witnesses’ being ‘evidence. Be assured, I the not too distant future ‘eye witnesses’ will be giving sworn testimony.

eye witness statements are not ‘hearsay’.

What like the video that was found on the phone of a dead Palestinian Emergency Service worker in a mass grave where the IDF had dumped him after gunning down him and his colleagues? Or is it you are only interested in tossing out deflections from the statements of eyewitnesses?

No, not signing it does not tell you anything other than they didn’t sign it. Maybe some don’t want to upset their favorite lobby group.

Are there any other religious groups who’s views you believe MPs should ignore?

And of course antisemitism is the only possible reason why 220MPs could possibly support the formal recognition of Palestine.

You are clinging on to avery basic logical fallacy. The report only confirms the views of 220MP’s, the views of the rest are not stated and therefore unknown.

Totally ignoring the witnesses account.

Curiously the report doesn’t tell us anything about the actual issue that caused the deadlock/with-drawl of the U.S./Israel negotiating team(s).

Meanwhile continue with the collective punishment of civilians AKA. A war crime.

Nice swerve on a very simple question, and even then your response is open for reason label dispute.

““We can forgive [them] for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with [them] when they love their children more than they hate us …” (The exact wording of this quote from 1957 is disputed,)” The ‘you made me kill your children’ argument, the fallacy of which can be demonstrated in the recent killing of Palestinians at a market, in a cafe, at a water distribution center. In each case Israel claimed to have been targeting members of Hamas/suspected Jihadist. So here’s a question, would Israel have launched missiles to target those same members of Hamas/suspected Jihadist if they had been surrounded by Israel civilians at a market, in a cafe or at a water distribution station? I look forward to Israel’s supporters answering that question.

I think it’s great news. More so when the impact on ‘purple districts’ is examined.

Moreover, all those child raping men remain at large. It’s a woman that gets locked up while they get protected by Trump and the DOJ. But no, she facilitated heinous crimes, she should rot in prison, but so should the people Trump is protecting.

I don’t know if you are aware but MAGA is the political movement that has taken hold of the Republican Party. This is only one example of rightwing child sex abusers, there are many others; which perhaps explains the MAGA fixation with this particular set of criminal behaviors. Who tried to murder who?

There’s something seriously wrong in MAGA world. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fox-news-guest-san-francisco-crime-now-accused-of-committing-a-crime_n_674607aee4b0fffc5a468c25

Get it done.