Chomper Higgot

Do you mind if in the interests of civility I don’t answer that question?!

Not speaking on the behalf of rightwing thugs rioting, that’s for sure.

The wider public seem to have a different view: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-riots-anti-racism-walthamstow-london-b2593146.html

Perhaps with coordinated riots across the country the PM was being briefed on the online hate mongering that was there for all to see.

Gawd does the self stroked grievance ever end? Remind me to wish you a Merry Christmas in December, I won’t feel the least bit uncomfortable doing so.

Race baiters as in the racists making racist remarks from the stage at Trump’s MSG Rally?

Again speculation. You think ‘they knew’. Do you think the police are right to ask people not to speculate as it might prejudice the trial?

You are perhaps unaware there is no legal justification for rioting.

“Guilty pleas were required in order to get the sentencing press releases and videos out quickly” That’s a remarkable claim, I’ll not ask for remarkable evidence, rather any evidence will do. Let’s see what you’ve got.

On what basis?

I doubt it, the Police, CPS and Courts have already demonstrated their ability and willingness to deal with rioters. Swiftly putting a stop to the coordinated violent and racist rightwing riots across the country in such short order was a resounding success.

Sorry, I answered the question you addressed to me.

I would very much like to see Nick Lowe’s face a thorough police investigation, prosecution and if found guilty should be sentence to prison to the full extent of the law. Will that do?

Oh so no need for an inquiry, no need for questions in Parliament, just bring mokwit along, mokwit knows.

He was in prison because joined a violent race riot. He confessed his crimes. And yes he had no prior criminal record, which only goes to demonstrate the dangers of inciting violence and race hatred, a previously law abiding man commits crimes completely out of his character. Hold those promoting race hatred and inciting the riots responsible. I’m not going to address your ‘I he was a Muslim…’ grievance fantasy’.

What a strange response. You call me a fool on the basis of your speculation.

I’ll leave it to you and the other grievance addicts to invent reasons why that is.

Even if they did not know they have no excuse for reveling in the racism presented from the stage and moreover Trump himself has no excuse for not immediately disavowing that racism. None of this was chance, racists we’re invited to speak at the rally, the MAGA crowd reveled in that racism and Trump stands by it. It was a racist rally for a racist movement headed by a racist.

There you go making wild and unsubstantiated guesses again. Refer to the top of the thread for the actual topic of discussion.

Like I said, you are habitually ill-informed.

If you were not so habitually ill-informed you might understand that in the wake of Trump’s MSG Race Hate Rally, this is a photo that will not go down very well with millions of Puerto Ricans.

I’m not deflecting and yes one guy win his case the others confessed to their crimes. Rather than rant at me why not vent your anger at the people who spewed hate online with the intent of stirring up racial hatred, Wayne O'Rourke is an example. It’s those people who stirred the hatted that encouraged a grandfather to join in at the front of a violent race riot, he was in prison because of the race hatred he joined and his own action. Yes dying in prison is an awful end to an otherwise lawful life, but it wasn’t me who encouraged his actions that put him in prison.

It’s a grand conspiracy and the evidence is another grand conspiracy.

Do the crime, do the time. Isn’t that what supporters of law and order say?

Dishonest debating like making accusations but providing no evidence. Or as in calling people liars without evidence of lying. ?