Chomper Higgot

The following link will provide live updates of seats lost/gained/retained as the counts come in: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2024/may/02/local-elections-2024-full-council-results-for-england

They’ve been in Government for over 14 years. I’d start with that as a cause.

Maybe they should, but this is clearly rigged in the Government’s favor. The parallels between rightwing shenanigans in the U.S. and UK make discernment a challenge.

If any citizen was turned away from a polling station without being able to vote then they were denied their vote. The list is cooked in favor of Conservative voters. So by example, an OAP bus pass is acceptable but a student or young person’s bus pass is not. I’m sure the data will come in once the vote counts are over.

I’ve provided a link to Government data on voting fraud, it’s near non existent. What’s going on here is an effort disenfranchise citizens. The Government choosing the voters rather than voters choosing the Government.

Not calling you out Stoner, just a correction. The US dominates the topics and found easily be mistaken as there are efforts there, also by the political right, to use ID as a means to disenfranchise citizens without any evidence of significant voter fraud.

It looks like Larry has been a naughty boy… again This once could see him behind bars and perhaps placed on the sex offenders register too: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/02/police-investigate-laurence-fox-upskirting-tweet-narinder-kaur

It’s UK related. This makes interesting background reading: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/research-reports-and-data/electoral-fraud-data/2022-electoral-fraud-data

The Government’s gerrymandering has done exactly what it was predicted to do, deny citizens their right to vote. But I wonder, was it this particular group of citizens the architects of the scheme to deny citizens their vote had in mind: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/02/minister-sorry-as-veterans-find-id-card-not-valid-for-english-elections

There’s gaping gaps between the two parties. Look at the state of the NHS now compared to 15 years ago. The current Government are making promises of unfounded tax cuts and spending approaching £100Billion. That on top of the highest tax take since WW2. Schools falling apart, public transport failing, rivers polluted, cronyism skimming billions, police failing to attend crime scenes, hospital waiting lists, dentists (if you can find one), and of course immigration out of control. Not in the news, near zero important checks on goods with the risk of disease to UK farming. Oh and trashing the UK’s tariff free access to EU markets, something nobody voted for I look forward to the election.

It makes a huge difference. Your crystal ball needs a clean.

What on earth are banging on about? If you’ve got a problem with immigrants in the UK take it up with the failing Tory Government, but don’t hang about, they won’t.

Well those are all the problems 14 years of failing Tory Government have delivered.

My lot?

Meanwhile NY special election went to the Democrat with a significantly increased share of the vote.

There are migrants, and there are significantly more than there were when this failing Government came to power. Having done nothing about the problem other than watch it grow the Government now engage in performative action which is little more than pushing even more UK tax payers’ money down the Tory sewer.

14 years of failure, hundreds of £millions of UK tax payers’ money flushed down the drain. Yep, seen it.

Actually I’ve anything but obtuse, directly challenging your unsubstantiated claims. I understand that’s difficult for you to deal with, but it is how discussions work.

At least when I post links they address the point I’m making. You should give that a try.

How about picking a link and telling us what claims of yours you think it is supporting.

Probably best you don’t get into this with me or anyone else for that matter. The link you have provided provides zero support to your claim that asylum seekers should seek refuge in the fire safe country. No such requirement exists.

Link to your claim they are supposed to seek refuge in the first safe country?

put a pin in that.

Do we all accept Trump is now in jail watch?

Links to claims made please.