Chomper Higgot

They’ve got their hands full teaching some spelling.

I think I’ll skip reading the OP.

“However, this policy excludes those convicted of sexual offenses,terrorism, domestic abuse, or serious violent crimes.”

I’ll admit no such thing. They’ve been in Government 2 months, they’ve been in Government 2 months, barely any policies are started, let alone put into full effect. I suggest you try to get over the news of July 5.

They blocked two impeachments too. Look how that’s working out for them.

I don’t eat bugs. And nobody is forcing me or anyone else to eat bugs. Why you chose to swallow the bug conspiracy is what needs an explanation.

And parents buy junk food as a direct result of marketing of junk food.

Nobody is being forced to eat bugs. Is there any conspiracy nonsense you won’t swallow?

Crackpot conspiracy is rather weirdly attractive to Tump’s supporters, foreign and domestic. They’ll swallow anything no matter how whacked out, nonsense about bugs even.

“He [PM Starmer] will urge for "major surgery, not sticking plaster solutions"” I expect you might get some answers to your questions once the policies in response to this one day old report have been established and published. The Government have already made statements on policy objectives to curb the adverting of ‘junk foods’, the sale of ‘energy drinks’ and to align laws governing the sale of nicotine vapes with those of tobacco. Junk food, high glycemic index foods and tobacco being significant causes of ill health across the nation. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/12/keir-starmer-labour-radical-public-health-drive-junk-food-ads-energy-drinks-nhs

Again, not whataboutary. Refer source of article above.

The number of tie-breaking votes cast is a product of a hung Congress, nothing at all to do with any qualities of the VP.

A lot of words that have zero bearing on the fact that the President sets the policies of the Presidency. There is a clue in the name.

The President sets the policy of the Presidency.

She’s not the President, she doesn’t decide current policies.

It’s not whataboutary Jonny, the article that comprises the OP is from (brace yourself), The Telegraph.

“I have the concept of a plan’” ”Imigrants are eating dogs and cats” ”I saw it on TV” You might be right about Trump and ‘on substance’.

I wasn’t aware ‘allegations’ are established facts.

Murder is the stuff the Nazis were engaging in as the conducted their genocidal campaigns, stuff you obfuscate and excuse. I trust you do accept the British, Americans and Russians too did know how to deal with Nazis, Nazi sympathizers and Nazi enablers.

I don’t pay MTG much attention, I can’t stand the noise, but she’s right to call this out. Racism is absolutely not a defining trait of rightwing politics, it is however far too common amongst some on the political right. Once again MTG is right to call this out.

Like this from The Telegraph: Headline: “BBC Chairman Calls For a Thorough Review of Israel-Hamas War Bias” Report: “ Samir Shah, chairman of the BBC, has called for a thorough review of the broadcaster's coverage of the Israel-Hamas war amid accusations of bias.“

Oh so the hundred of thousands of British and British Empire troops, airmen, sailors who fought to help defeat the Nazis had no impact? Here’s an undeniable fact, they knew precisely how to deal with Nazis, Nazi sympathizers and those giving Nazis a helping hand.

“Russia, if you’re listening”

The report was published 17 hrs ago. It might be reasonable to expect the adoption policies to answer the reports findings to take more 17 hrs. It might also be reasonable to assume the response you claim from ’1 in 5’ or indeed anyone else for that matter has not yet materialized. I do however stress both these are reliant upon the concept of reasonableness and not a partisan knee jerk reaction.

Especially those who get their opinions from the Kremlin’s misinformation machine.