Chomper Higgot

There’s nothing stupid about recognizing Nazi apologia and Holocaust denial for what they are, or indeed who it that they attract and enroll as defenders of the lies and hatred at their core. Although I do accept this filth has its admirers.

Did you think listening to a guy engaging in Nazi apologia and the fabricated lie that is Holocaust denial might offer some kind of enlightenment?

Why would Carlson interrupt a Nazi apologist and Holocaust denier? It’s bang center of his own USP.

No I did not. I’m not interested in the lies of a Nazi apologist Holocaust denier.

But does sod all to stop it raining.

I wonder if the minority Opposition party will put a stop to this. I hear it’s a thing.

Oh.

Oh a personal attack. Now that’s new.

Which you could substantiate with some facts, and links if you had any. An ill conceived policy that was bound from the onset to fail. Hundreds of £millions of tax payers money pished away with absolutely no benefit to the nation. Brought to you by a Government with a massive majority in Parliament. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/15/rwanda-plan-tatters-defeat-undermines-entire-tory-project https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/qa-the-uks-policy-to-send-asylum-seekers-to-rwanda/

He hasn’t been ‘banned’. If you don’t understand why Jones lost then you perhaps didn’t grasp the 1st Amendment. This is the issue, Jones was sued by private individuals, not by the Government. There is nothing in the 1st Amendment which prohibits those cases against Jones.

Sounds right up your street. Have signed up for the 6 part podcast?

I recommend reading the 1st Amendment.

Yep, you made a ridiculous claim and you aren’t happy I pointed out the gaping hole in it. That you have done so in the past only confirms your pattern behaviour. The Tory Rwanda scheme failed because it was ill conceived performative cruelty that was from the outset in breach of UK law. Hundreds of £millions of tax payer’s money pished away on performative cruelty that was doomed to fail and did exactly that.

Perhaps by serendipity, this article appears with an advertisement for real estate. Not that I expect an algorithm might have put together ‘assisted dying’ with ‘property and real estate’, but it might be something worth considering when framing the debate.

Now all you have to do is explain how a party in opposition manages to derail the policies of a Government in possession of an 80 seat majority. Give it your best try.

A different ‘They’.

As in Government deciding who private businesses can lend money to. Sounds a lot like centralized government authoritarianism to me.

The deliberately constructed Holocaust denial lie does not provide any knowledge or insights, it is a lie designed to instill and promote ignorance of the truth.

Holocaust denial is not a ‘view point’ it is deliberately constructed lie.

Holocaust denial isn’t an opinion. Its a very deliberate lie.

No, you imagined incorrectly, again. Carlson platformed this vile holocaust denier to make money. I think advertisers should consider if they want their products and services to be associated with such filth.

Advertisers, are you taking note of this?

There is not an American alive more firmly latched on to the Federal tit than Musk. The man is a Federal Dollar subsidy junky.

Judge Merchan once again demonstrates what a very fine judge he is.

Here’s the audience for the filth Carlson chose to platform.