Chomper Higgot

My lot? What on earth are you on about ‘my lot’? Is there a thread in that?

The grievance stroking complete with lie laden memes. Steve Mallon was jailed for violent disorder: https://www.cps.gov.uk/north-east/news/first-prison-sentences-those-involved-north-east-unrest

Oh dear, you’ve been on those far right video sharing sites again.

If you are going to make statements about what’s the topic of a thread, first check the thread’s title and Opening Post, and don’t assume others won’t do so: The topic is: Mass Arrests Follow Violent Far-Right Demonstrations Across the UK But I do understand your need to deflect from discussion on the matter. Especially if you can point your finger elsewhere.

Simple, you’re on your whataboutary kick again.

They are not opinion pieces stoner, they are reporting facts. Your aversion to which suggests you’ve at last given up all pretense of impartiality.

Less of your aggression please: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/georgia-election-board-reasonable-inquiry-rule-trump/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-swing-state-officials-election-deniers-1235069692/

He’s not even campaigning, well apart from in Montana a State that is solidly Republican. But he has in a number of occasions told his supporters ‘I contended your votes’ and ‘we have the votes’. Perhaps he’s hoping the election deniers the Republicans have been inserting into state electoral commissions are going to come to his aid.

The riots are far right thuggery.

And yet another example of the rightwing accusation confession thing.

Oh, those immigrant forced the rightwing thugs to riot. Because of course, it’s always somebody else’s fault.

Well it’s certainly not good news for Vance. He needs to watch his step, he might well wind up being tossed under wheels of the Route 191 Bus to Rikers Island.

Have good time.

Nah, those so much to be done, batting back lies and mis formation posted by the reactionary grievance strokers amongst us. Think of it as performing a service, to prevent the forum turning into a reactionary grievance stroking echo chamber.

I posted the actual court ruling, but it doesn’t cut through the grievance stroking. And don’t waste time asking for links to the source of claims that have been demonstrated to be false.

Yes we know. It’s called obfuscation.

Even for you that’s a bizarre take on my post.

The Government haven’t granted themselves new powers. The Act of Parliament hasn’t been passed. Your attempts to diminish the scale of the riots and the threat they are to communities across the UK are noted.

Yes we know where Twitter is band, it’s you stroking your grievance with your imaginary British Government banning Twitter.

Dreaming up stuff to feed your need for Grievance. The UK have not blocked Twitter, there are no indications that they will.

Here’s your (unattributed) statement: “John O'Malley, 43 2 years 8 months for shouting and gesturing, others have been jailed for spitting at Police or just being at the front of a demonstration. Meanwhile, we are still waiting for the Muslim airport thugs who attacked the police to even be charged.” I asked you for a link to the source. You claim you got it from SKY, which is odd because Sky’s report is nothing like your (unattributed) statement: “John O'Malley, 43 O'Malley was also sentenced to two years and eight months in prison after pleading guilty to violent disorder outside a mosque in Southport on 30 July. He claimed he was just "standing in a group of people shouting and gesticulating", but didn't throw any objects or damage any property. Judge Andrew Menary KC, however, said he was "at the front at what was essentially a baying mob" and part of a "surge that broke police lines". O'Malley had a previous conviction for battery and being "part of a crowd using obviously racist and religiously intolerant language" was an aggravating factor.” https://news.sky.com/story/the-men-who-have-been-jailed-for-rioting-so-far-13193109 ——- To answer your question, Sky has not published Hogwash, their report accurately summarizes the actual court ruling. That it bears no resemblance to your statement is matter for you to explain.

I’m not lying, if I spot a Nazi sympathizer, I call them a Nazi sympathizer, I don’t bother with ‘implying’. I did not call you a Nazi Sympathizer.

Beyond you obviously wishing to hide where you get your misinformation, it no longer matters, I posted the actual court records demonstrating you were posting hogwash.

A fair point, but I suggest you take it up with Stoner and his grievance over Nazis being called Nazis’.

Whataboutary isn’t helping you. You did take note of the source of the article I linked?