Chomper Higgot

Second amendment? What's that got to do with Trump’s criminal trial? Or are your histrionics progressing?

It was you who introduced Mugabe Jonny. Despite him being completely irrelevant to the topic of discussion. Respecting the result of an overwhelming democratic vote is not ‘supporting’ anyone, it’s respecting the result of the election.

I have not flung any kind of names, not is it a something I do. Thank you for your baseless accusation.

It’s a point that raises question. How many of the vehicles owing the charges are driven by Embassy Staff on Embassy business?

Well clearly if the mayor got 43.8% of the vote and there is no corresponding 43.8% demographic, then people from other demographics must have voted for Mayor Khan. I trust you’ll accept that the above resort to clear logic fits with the ‘reasonable rational conversation’ you called for in this post, the rest of which I feel no need to address:

I didn’t miss your point Jonny. You are equating Major Khan to Mugabe, because you’re not happy the people of London have selected the Mayor they wanted and the one you consistently make pejorative remarks against. I do understand there’s something you really don’t like about Khan, I just haven’t yet figured out what that is.

Mugabe. What on earth are you on about Jonny? Equating Mayor Khan to Mugabe, or even dangerous miscreants, have you lost all sense of reality?

So which demographic represents 43.8% of the population of London? Or did voters from all sorts of backgrounds vote for Mayor Khan?!

Yes, and his past performance for London. Now what do you think is the reason behind Khan receiving 43.8% of the vote?

Khan being voted in is a result of the numbers of votes he received, 43.8% of the ballot.

There is no ‘Anti-Semitic authoritarian policing to support, it doesn’t exist. It’s an allegation based on a doctored video produced by an antagonistic activist. London has the Mayor Londoners voted for.

The People of a London don’t seem to agree with your constant pejorative views (I wonder what’s behind that) of the Mayor they elected for the third time with an increased majority.

It’s not irony Jonny. It’s whataboutary.

I understand Trump enjoyed the performance, but testimony it was not.

Those pesky colonists, never have liked paying their taxes to the crown.

It’s a characteristic of toxic narcissists. They are toxic.

It doesn’t belong to the Pope.

Not a lot of fans of ‘morality and humanity’ either.

Oh, so it’s President Biden. But he wasn’t President at the time of these alleged crimes. So maybe you didn’t mean ‘Commander in Chief’?! Go on, educate me, who were you referring to?

Who’s the ‘Commander in Chief’?

And you can provide a link.

Put your Oxford Dictionary aside for a moment and chew on this: 18 U.S.C. § 2381 says, “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or imprisoned and fined, and incapable of holding any U.S. office.”

An argument only someone ignorant of the U.S. Constitution, or deliberately ignoring it, could make.

Well I don’t agree with the death penalty on the grounds that it is an irreversible penalty delivered by a fallible justice system. That aside, as he’s not an American and therefore isn’t a traitor(to the US) , but he almost certainly is an agent of a foreign power (Russia) and there is definitely cause for him to face trial for his part in the same crimes that Chelsea Manning was found guilty of and served time for. He’s also demonstrably a sniveling coward, though that’s only one of his character flaws and is not a crime.

Assange is not accused of a minor crime, he’s accused of espionage and he’s a demonstrated flight risk. Assange is not facing the death penalty. Your histrionics over ‘gallows’ are noted.