Chomper Higgot

No, your post was a baseless slur, from the same dishonesty that had you truncating my post and juxtaposing against something I was not responding to. You’ve got nothing but baseless slurs and dishonest representation of my comments. I did ask, are you man enough to correct your error, clearly you are not.

Of course, because my categorical statement does not fit your misrepresentation of my views. I’ve underlined the salient part. Now here’s your baseless slur again, are you man enough to withdraw it?

I have already stated: I would like to see all rapists get the maximum sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, if you have any evidence of me saying otherwise please post it. Now let’s have your retraction of your baseless slur.

Let’s have your withdrawal of your baseless slur first.

Jonny, I know who Starmer is. Its this Two Tier Kier character to you keep referring to that does not exist.

When did I say it doesn’t need to be changed? It seems at odds with what I actually said.

Since you can’t substantiate this, do you think you could man up and admit you made an unsubstantiated slur?

It seems you’ve lost the ability to construct an argument and are now relying on ripped memes.

I notice you quote my response to another post but then deliberately juxtaposition it against something completely different. Here’s my post back in context of your question I was replying to: A little less dishonesty on your part might help.

That would be difficult, no such person exists.

If you are going to claim I agree with something then you need to provide evidence of me doing so. I’ll not hold my breath on that. I would like to see all rapists get the maximum sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, if you have any evidence of me saying otherwise please post it.

I don’t regard the sentencing to prison of people joining violent race riots where they engage in violent t disorder as draconian. The fact that the coordinated race riots across the country came to such a swift end once stiff sentences were administered to rioters indicates the reaction of the police, COS and courts was admirably correct. I don’t have a need for grievance and therefore do not engage in sulking over the fact different t crimes in different places at different times are treated differently. Violent disorder and violent race rioting are not ‘legitimate protest’. But I think you know that.

I’ve already linked the actual sentencing guidelines for this crime, as set by the last Government in 2022. That’s what the sentencing is and should be. If it needs changing Parliament can do. Maybe Jenrick could raise a Private Member’s bill to plug his failure to address this when in Government.

No I do not. I do not think the sentencing of any criminals should be determined by a politician using criminal sentencing in pursuit of personal political advantage. Jenick was in Government the last time the sentencing for these crimes was reviewed, if there is something wrong with the sentencing then he is part of the problem.

Jenick is simply trying to out rabid his rabid opponents for leadership of the Tory Party. The sentence for these crimes was last revised in 2022 when he was a member of the then Government.

We’re getting somewhere at last. Yes the court records show what crimes were committed. The sentencing guidelines determine the parameters of the sentence. I have absolutely suggested you look beyond the crimes committed and lay some of the blame on those who fed the rioters with the lies and hatred that motivated their decision to join violent t race riots. Non of the blame for the crimes can be direct at me. I cannot help you with your need for grievance.

I get your problem Jonny. Court records contradict the false narrative you need to cling to I order to feed your need for grievance.

It’s a great idea, all the grievance addicts can then claim to be a global ethnic minority.

The current maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment, last revised in 2022 when Jenrick was a minister in a Government with an unassailable majority in Parliament. https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/revised-sentencing-guidelines-for-child-sexual-offences-published/

Ten years in Parliament as member of a party with an unassailable majority, and only now in opposition does he start coming up with ideas.

So it was a meaningless nonsense claim.

I recommend the manager checks the cash register.

No Jonny, I’m calling out the gaslighting. You give me the names of people sent to prison for posting stuff online and I’ll (once again) provide records of the actual crimes committed, the term ‘Hurty Words’ will not be included in the crimes. But you already know that.

Nobody got sent to prison for posting ‘Hurty Words’.

It’s not an act by the Labour Party, though the Telegraph would like to mislead you into believing it is.