Chomper Higgot

Once again you come up with no evidence whatsoever to back your claim that Lammy was the beneficiary of positive discrimination. But he’s not Asian, he’s not White and he went to Harvard. More than enough for your hair trigger.

How so. Until last week the Tories were doing nothing about the backlog of asylum seekers while handing hundreds of £millions to Rwanda . This week Labour are dealing with the backlog and have put an end to the hugely expensive and failed Rwanda asylum seeker exchange scheme. All positive changes and kicked off in under a week.

Pure wildly generalized pejorative assumptions. No need to blame asylum seekers for the corruption and mendacity of a few Tories.

Again no evidence whatsoever. ‘Typically’, assumed grade equivalence, absolutely no consideration of Lammy’s work experience as an Barrister with international experience. But you have let your cat out of its bag. You’ve asserted without evidence that David Lammy did not meet the entrance requirements. You also stated that Harvard has been ordered by a court of law to cease discriminatory practices against Asian and White applicants. And there we have it. You don’t know on what basis David Lammy entered Harvard, so you assume that because he’s not White or Asian that he must have benefited from positive discrimination. Stop digging Jonny.

I’ll thank you to permit me to express my own opinions. No need for you to go inventing views I have never expressed.

Who “supports asylum for people with fake claims?” I have never once seen anyone on this forum support fake asylum claims.

My bad. FPTP has delivered a Government with a secure majority. Such outcomes were never a problem until the beneficiary was a Labour Government.

It could have been worse, you could have given a load of cash to an old school chum for nothing in return, and told your gf she’s got to pay it back over the next twenty five years, and in the meantime she’s getting no money for health care.

Where is your evidence that he lacked the entry requirements? Your assertion, you back it up.

It doesn’t matter , the majority of people who voted did so for Labour.

Count the MP seats in parliament that each party secured. Eventually you’ll work it out.

‘Brit haters’? What on earth are you on about?

Not quite a week and no evidence of making things worse, let alone much worse. Already Labour have cut hundreds of £millions that would have been handed to Rwanda for the failed asylum seeker exchange scheme; money than can now be put towards clearing to backlog of asylum seekers left by the Tories. Clear the back log, release successful applicants into the community where they can work, earn their own keep and pay taxes, deport the bogus claimants. Great to see Labour are already on it in under a week What a positive change that is.

The Electorate voted for change, Labour are delivering change. Making wild predictions about how Labour will perform doesn’t change that fact.

Jonny, these are the scapegoating excuses the Tories tried to con the electorate with. I don’t know if you missed the news, they failed.

You haven’t provided any evidence that David Lammy benefited from ‘positive discrimination’. Your assertion! You just inserted it into the discussion, why you chose to do so is a mystery. Perhaps there is something about David Lammy that triggered you reaching for the race card.

Quit with your gaslighting. It’s not an amnesty.

It is but triggered minds just trigger.

‘The Left’s obsession with gay conversion therapy in the form of mind/body altering drugs has many negative affects.‘ And yet it here you are inserting “ gay conversion therapy in the form of mind/body altering drugs has many negative affects” into the discussion. There is zero indication the OP that any of these things played any role in this heinous murder. There is evidence of an obsession with these things, not from the left but from you personally.

What’s this ‘Gay men are immune to hate mongering against transgender people’?

You provided zero evidence that David Lammy benefitted from positive ‘discrimination/affirmative action’. But you have mentioned ‘racist policy’. I’m sure there is racism in this somewhere Jonny, but perhaps not where you want us to believe.

The new policy is to clear the backlog left by the previous government and cancel the Rwanda asylum seeker exchange scheme.

Yes, the Tory Client Press have started their misinformation.

Let’s see the diagnosis upon which you base your claim Jonny.

Yet more rightwing accusation confession.