Chomper Higgot

More ill informed nonsense.

It’s true of hospitals across the UK. Without foreign staff at all levels from cleaners to consultant surgeons they’d not be able provide the health services the nation needs.

Once again you demonstrate how ill informed you are on the matters you choose to discuss. The case which Prince Andrew chose to settle with his mummy’s money was a civil suit, the purpose of which is to determine liability and award compensation. Cold hard cash settlements are a principle part of civil suit. It was not a matter of ‘justice’. Moreover, giving false testimony under oath is the criminal offense of Perjury, odd how Prince Andrew chose settle out of court with mummy’s money rather than file a complaint of perjury and see his accuser prosecuted.

Your sympathies clearly lie with the credibly accused rapist. I doubt you’d be so stupid as to accuse me of anything under oath.

Sympathies lie with the victims of Espstein and all those who engaged in his crimes against minors. Prince Andrew is credibly accused of being amongst the abusers.

Not ‘my evidence’, evidence before the court. Once again, child victims of sex trafficking and statutory rape are not prostitutes. Nobody is calling for anyone to be locked up and the key thrown away. Only one of us is defending a guy credibly accused of rape.

If we are moving into the realm of Trump’s fantasy war negotiations, I look forward to hearing his negotiating strategy with the Axis to avoid WW2. Perhaps less of a negotiation and more of an alliance.

He’s a bit slow on this. His supporters are already here on this forum stating words to the effect of Trump appointed Justices on the SCOTUS will do him a solid.

Lying under oath is perjury, which is why ‘don’t make statements under oath if you need to lie’ is good legal advice. I’m not angry. Neither am I defending a credibly accused rapist who is unwilling to defend himself.

Moreover, the allegations are made under oath. Prince Andrew denies the sworn allegations against him but will not make that denial under oath. He’s dull, but not that dull.

Meanwhile the allegations persist, and aren’t going to disappear. He’s going to spend his life dodging this sordid part of his past. Charles needs to do the smart thing and toss him to the curb for bringing the institution of the Royal Household into disrepute.

Court files are not ‘tabloid rags’. Sworn testimony before a court of law is evidence. Prince Andrew can whenever he chooses provide a sworn testimony of his side of the story, he refuses to do so and used his mummy’s money to settle out of court before Discovery commenced. If only one side of this story is being told, that’s because Prince Andrew has refused to give his side of events that are a matter of public record.

Appart from she was trafficked for sex (a crime) and she was raped in the U.S. while a minor. The allegations are a matter of sworn testimony before a court of law. Prince Andrew refuses to give sworn testimony, or at least for now he does. As I said earlier, settling out of court with mummy’s money before Disclosure commenced was an unusually smart move for a guy who is known to be not very smart. Certainly not smart enough to understand he’s not put an end to this sordid piece of his past.

Minors may not consent to sex, they are by definition of law victims of statutory rape, they are not prostitutes.

Let’s see you provide evidence of Biden making payments to Iran. Your claim, back it up.

Biden is not infirm. Get a grip of some reality for a change.

Pure projection of Trump’s failings.

Except both parties didn’t

And of course like all dictators he’ll stop there.

You’ve gone all irrational and manic again.

Trump has stated he will be a ‘dictator on day one’.

Either that or all the winning has worn them out.

One is fit and takes regular exercise, the other is morbidly obese, slurs terribly and smells worse.

OK. Any polls showing growing support for BREXIT? Or any polls indicating any positive public opinion on anything BREXIT?

Lame attempt to pin someone else’s tax issues on President Biden. Do you do rational argument?