Chomper Higgot

I doubt very much you know what actually went on, or rather that your version of events is an faithful representation of what went on. I don’t dismiss what went on. Rather it’s not the subject of discussion and I’m not wired to pathologically insert the subject were it doesn’t belong.

For me it’s a yes. I ride with front flashing frog lights on both forks and a rear Cat-Eye strobe light. I find this significantly reduce the frequency of vehicles pulling out in front of me while passing vehicles more often lay back and pass wide.

I’m sure you could. But why? It’s got nothing at all to do with the topic of discussion. Refer top of thread for easily grasped clues.

Or so you assert.

Not unless courts of law no longer pass judgement it isn’t.

They prove nothing of the sort. The court papers are a record, they are transcripts.

You really do need to read some law.

You need to read some law.

Sex with a minor in the U.S. is definitely rape, the disgraced Prince Andrew is credibly alleged to have done just that.

That’s not the legal age wrt prostitution and it’s certainly not the legal age in the U.S. locations the disgraced Prince Andrew is alleged to have committed sex crimes.

Refer to the top of the thread for the subject of discussion, and yes I agree, statutory rape’.

Not applicable to the crimes alleged to have occurred in the U.S. And within the U.K. sex with a prostitute under the age of 18 is a crime, additionally so if they have been trafficked for the purposes of sex. Refer Sexual Offenses Act 2003.

That might be true of the monarch himself, it is not true of any other member of the royal family. Like I said, the disgraced Prince Andrew will not be visiting NY again or indeed the US.

If the rightwing christofascists he elevated to the SCOTUS can’t save him, he hopes the misery of an economic crash is visited on America to the job for him. Maybe one of the totalitarian thugs he admires so much can get the message and disrupt oil and gas supplies, or a major trade route, that might do the trick.

Irrelevant unless those countries are places where the alleged crimes took place. Referring to the subject of this thread, Epstein’s home was in NY, I doubt the disgraced Prince Andrew will visit NY again, or indeed the U.S.

Again, Perjury is a serious crime. Why doesn’t the disgraced Prince Andrew file a police complaint?!

Again, sworn testimony before a court Jonny. Don’t ever do such a thing unless you are telling the truth. If the testimony was a lie, why doesn’t the disgraced Prince Andrew file a complaint of Perjury…. And libel?!

We’ll to fair, begging mummy for money is the least of the accusations against the disgraced Prince Andrew.

You are correct. ’Girls’.

Poor old Andrew, I wonder did he know his mum was in her last days when he went begging her for her money to shutdown accusations against him before he himself had to go under oath? Since you introduce yourself into the discussion, I trust that’s not something you’d stoop to. Despite our disagreements I like to think better of you than that.

Her word was given under oath. His word was not and was accompanied by a 12million of his mummy’s money to ensure he was not put under oath.

Precisely that.

Of course you haven’t because you refuse to accept the published court records.

Ignorance of the girls age is not an excuse to break the law, and the people who procured snd trafficked her would have a hard time arguing they did not know her age. In England it is illegal to have sex with a minor trafficked for prostitution. And if you insist that she was a prostitute, then while English law does not penalize prostitutes it does stipulate that participants must be over the age of 18. In this respect procurement of people Under the age of 18 for prostitution and participation in sex with a person under the age who has been procured for prostitution is offense under Clause 47 the UK’s Sexual Offenses Act 2003. Moreover, a U.K. resident who has sex with a minor overseas, in this case NY, and where that minor has been trafficked for the purposes of prostitution commits the offense under Clause 47 the Sexual Offenses Act 2003 as stipulated under Clause72 of the Act. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/offences-outside-the-united-kingdom/enacted

I see you are still pretending the allegations against Prince Andrew only relate to what happened in London. Hardly surprising since once we look at his credibly alleged behavior in NY, where the Epstein home that is the subject of this thread is located, a whole new raft of laws come into play. Prince Harry is a member of the Royal Family. By all means attack him with the vitriol you reserve for him and his wife, but please lay off your ridiculous hypocrisy of enjoying your attacks on Harry and his wife while accusing others of engaging in an ‘attack on British Royalty’ for exercising their right to criticize credibly alleged rapist Prince Andrew.