What you do/have done is a matter for British law.
Have sex with a trafficked 17 year old American and it becomes a matter for US law, I have already provided you one of the applicable statutes.
There are many reasons why people are not charged under Federal Law, especially rich, powerful, well connected people.
This has no bearing on ‘credible accusation’.
Did you notice the evidence I gave for my statement that Prince Andrew was credibly accused of sex crimes was a court filing submitted to a court in Florida (USA).
The alleged victim is an American.
Trafficking a US Citizen who is a minor for sex is a Federal Crime.
When trafficked out of the US then US Federal Law still applies.
I have never claimed to be British.
In fact I have never once posted any confirmation of my nationality on this forum.
Quit being personal, stop making stuff up.
No I am not.
I have stated he was credibly accused of sex crimes, I provided a link to the US court filing - matters of fact.
I have not engaged in attacks on Prince Andrew other than to state facts recorded in court records.
She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid.
Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime.
Refer link in previous post above.
You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal (extra territorial) Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).
I’m not sure you understand the law on this matter.
His victim was an American, and was trafficked for the proposed of sex.
Regardless, my statement is still correct, Prince Andrew was credibility accused, Refer court filing I have posted.