Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,001
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. What you do/have done is a matter for British law. Have sex with a trafficked 17 year old American and it becomes a matter for US law, I have already provided you one of the applicable statutes.
  2. I don’t think Prince Andrew has ever been credibly accused of being bright.
  3. There are many reasons why people are not charged under Federal Law, especially rich, powerful, well connected people. This has no bearing on ‘credible accusation’.
  4. He’s credibly accused of sex crimes. Why the rush to defend him I wonder?!
  5. My statement is ‘Prince Andrew was credibly accused of sex crimes’. I never once stated he was charged.
  6. Did you notice the evidence I gave for my statement that Prince Andrew was credibly accused of sex crimes was a court filing submitted to a court in Florida (USA). The alleged victim is an American. Trafficking a US Citizen who is a minor for sex is a Federal Crime. When trafficked out of the US then US Federal Law still applies.
  7. Clearly I don’t. I normally label it nonsense and provide an explanation why. But, thanks for confirming you can’t back up you assertion
  8. I have never claimed to be British. In fact I have never once posted any confirmation of my nationality on this forum. Quit being personal, stop making stuff up.
  9. Enjoy: 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591
  10. No I am not. I have stated he was credibly accused of sex crimes, I provided a link to the US court filing - matters of fact. I have not engaged in attacks on Prince Andrew other than to state facts recorded in court records.
  11. The woman in question was under 18 at the time. Refer Federal Law I linked above, it is very clear on the matter.
  12. I never made such an allegation. Please provide a link where I did.
  13. You’ve made the allegation, now back it up. Give me an example of me engaging in mass psychosis.
  14. By providing links to the relevant law and not engaging in personal attacks.
  15. I didn’t read a link to make my post. I’ve provided a link to Federal Law per your request, deal with it.
  16. Making a joke out of of sexual exploitation of a young woman because you don’t have an argument Anglo at the legal facts.
  17. She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid. Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime. Refer link in previous post above.
  18. You can start with 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
  19. It doesn’t matter, she was a US citizen trafficked out of the US for sex.
  20. Give me some examples of were I have labelled peaceful protests as ‘hate speech’? Or do you feel you can just make stuff up?!
  21. You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal (extra territorial) Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).
  22. I’m not sure you understand the law on this matter. His victim was an American, and was trafficked for the proposed of sex. Regardless, my statement is still correct, Prince Andrew was credibility accused, Refer court filing I have posted.
×
×
  • Create New...