- Popular Post
![](https://assets.aseannow.com/forum/uploads/set_resources_40/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Caldera
-
Posts
6,266 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Caldera
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So they were able to enter Thailand using fake passports and were only caught when attempting to leave. That's reassuring.
-
3
-
Did you have previous SETVs in your passport, or was this one the first you applied for? I'm asking because your "history" seems (or seemed) to matter quite a bit in Penang.
-
1
-
-
58 minutes ago, jayci said:
How days visa exempt do NZ passport holders get at land border crossings?
I'm considering crossing at O'smach.30 days, which can be extended within Thailand at an immigration office by another 30 days. You can enter visa exempt at a land border twice per calendar year.
-
Based on recent reports, I think you are taking a risk, having 3 SETVs in your passport already. That might make you a target for the "void without prejudice" stamp.
As for re-entering Thailand from Cambodia, any land border except for Poipet should be fine. Personally, I like Koh Kong (Hat Lek on the Thai side) and have never had any issues when entering Thailand there.
-
While I'm not married and have no plans to get married, I must say that I find the process for an extension based on marriage as per reports here and elsewhere unnecessarily intrusive and - depending on the immigration office - sometimes outright denigrating to the applicant and his wife.
For this reason, even if it were an alternative for me (at least on paper), I would have a hard time to submit myself to that nonsense. Photos taken in the bedroom, clothes in the wardrobe being checked, neighbors being questioned about my marriage? Count me out!
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, YangYaiEric said:How can one know what the rules ARE now ?
That's the one billion baht question!
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, oldhippy said:1/ I used to be a macro economics lecturer, so maybe I know what I am talking about.
No offense, but most economists don't seem to know what they are talking about most of the time. You will need to forgive me that my trust in your profession is extremely limited. That's not any kind of bias, mind you, it's the fact that I've been reading what they've had to say for the last three decades. If there ever was a field that masquerades as a science but is fundamentally flawed by the standards of any real science, it would have to be economics.
-
7
-
2
-
I'm not of retirement age yet, but I could cope with the new requirements. As things stand now, my plan to go for the retirement extension as soon as I qualify age-wise remains unchanged.
-
2
-
-
14 hours ago, rogerpilly said:
Do I need to carry some cash to re enter Thailand?
In case you are asked, you need to have it. Since nobody can tell you if they will want to see it, better play it safe and carry the cash.
-
1
-
-
I'd make things much simpler. I'd replace the retirement visa by a generic "long stay for leisure" visa. No minimum age, but the foreigner has to post a bond for the duration of their stay that could match the current 800,000 baht. No yearly immigration visits, no silly 90 days reporting. Just report when you actually move to another residence.
That should free up valuable police resources that can be used to investigate those who violate the terms of their visa, while all the others should be left alone as much as possible.
Unfortunately, it will also require a professional police force. So most current police officers, immigration or otherwise, will need to be gone. Otherwise they'll just keep accepting bribes from those who shouldn't be allowed to stay, while making life difficult for others. No change in the visa rules alone can address this.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I don't see Elite as a serious alternative for those who qualify for the retirement extension using the 800,000 baht in the bank option. If you're prepared to keep that money in the bank at all times, it's about as hassle free as it could be, plus if and when you decide to leave, the money will still be yours to take along.
-
20
-
5
-
Amazing Thailand - in most countries his ambitions would have ended at the village clown level, here he was able to rise through the ranks all the way up to four star general. I really can't wait to see how many people will vote for this imbecile and his cronies.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
While I can see why pretty much all of the previous posters in this thread don't have much sympathy with her, that doesn't change the fact that Thailand's IDC is a complete and utter disgrace.
-
7
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Nonsensical scaremongering, nothing else.
-
2
-
1
-
3 hours ago, Caliguy said:
Another update from their facebook.
Important Update !
Please be informed that the official website for the Visa Application Appointment System (will be activated online from 30 January 2019 onwards) is http://thaivisavientiane.com
The Embassy will no longer use http://thaivisavientiane.org
Too dumb to get even the most basic things done without last-minute hiccups. Oh joy.
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, elviajero said:
As a start explain how someone denied entry under 12.9 for not have 20K baht on them is unlawful.
You still don't get it; I'm not claiming that each and every denial is unlawful, but you need to look at each individual case. If someone is asked to show 20,000 baht and cannot do as asked, the denial is lawful. But that's a big IF, as the interaction doesn't always seem to follow that pattern - when someone offers to show the money and they're unwilling to even look at it, clearly listing 12.9 as the sole reason or as one of the reasons for denial is dishonest.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, yellowboat said:
Cambodia seems to be one step ahead of Thailand.
Nope. Thailand has had that since quite a while.
-
21 hours ago, elviajero said:
Wow! Corruption within immigration. If we only knew! Your kind seem unable to separate genuine corruption with immigration doing their job!
My point is that when you are dealing with an agency where corruption and ineptitude are rampant, making a blanket claim such as "their denials are lawful!" is nothing more than a bad joke.
-
1
-
-
-
4 hours ago, elviajero said:
There is no more chance of getting denied at the airport than a land border.
I'll bite. Please provide us with the rejection rates per point of entry (airports, land borders, ports), let's say for 2018, broken down by visa type. That surely is the data you've looked at before making that statement.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, elviajero said:Denials rarely happen with visa holders. You may not like the underlying reason for these denials, but they are under orders from high, and the reasons given for denial conform with the immigration act and are entirely lawful.
You don't know that (despite claiming otherwise repeatedly) and as of now have consistently failed to back up your claims with facts, such as a police order to that effect. Yes, we all know your stories, but as far as I'm concerned, you're just another forum braggart who claims inside knowledge.
If this came from "high up", it would be applied at all border posts (such as the 2-visa-exempts-at-land-borders /year limit) and it would also be impossible to get an extension once you're over the "magic" 180 days/year time in country.
We do know for a fact, on the other hand, that immigration officers at Don Mueang alone have been in the news twice within the last six months (!) for unlawful activities. First a visa on arrival scam, now issuing "fake stamps". Knowing that and having followed similar stories in the past, where you take your confidence from that their arbitrary denials are lawful is anyone's guess, but the fact that they see the need to cite fantasy rules and then write down other reasons as justification doesn't exactly point in that direction.
-
3
-
Taking into account that actual accomplishments usually don't measure up to what's pompously announced and that this will be the very first version/iteration of the new system, my personal guess (and we're all guessing here!) is that the only check of real substance that will be done at the pre-approval stage is that the applicant hasn't been blacklisted. Consulates haven't been able to check that thus far and that really needs to be fixed.
Once issued, the details of the visa will then be available within that shared database, so immigration will have access and can verify that a visa presented on entry is genuine. That alone should make it impossible to just fake the visa stamp / sticker - obviously a huge improvement.
Anything beyond that might or might not come - later. I have to chuckle when I read what some people have dreamed up on here. That would be ambitious even for countries whose officials are much more switched, diligent and honest.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
13 minutes ago, Shiver said:So if you have 1 week to go, and they delay you for 2-3 weeks, does that mean you get overstay?
No. If you have to leave Thailand today, but your appointment will be in 2-3 weeks, you will have the option to leave Thailand and spend that time in Laos. Nobody forces you to remain in Thailand on overstay. Obviously, it would be a good idea to book your appointment well in advance, so that such a situation won't arise.
-
2
-
3
-
23 minutes ago, james.d said:
Bangkok to Saigon on AirAsia return for 1800 Thb? How is that as I looked early this morning and it was 3640 Thb with no checked baggage.
You can't just book it at that price on any given day. Wait until there's a promotion, then book suitable dates that the promotional offer is valid for.
-
1
-
1
-
Vietnamese blogger has vanishes in Thailand – Radio Free Asia
in Thailand News
Posted · Edited by Caldera
Clarity
If the Vietnamese authorities can abduct a Vietnamese citizen in Germany (as they did), I'm sure doing the same in Thailand is a cake walk in comparison.