Bday Prang

Yet you quoted me. My comments are levelled at all those who appear unable to understand what is clearly written in the article

I've always found a nasal spray perfectly adequate for a runny nose, generally only resorted to "sudafed" ( in the UK) for flu type infections, or when me and the lads were cooking up meth

won't get very far on one mushroom

No I didn't isn't it brilliant ?

That reflects my experience , those pesky stones really are agony aren't they.

and not much use for simply a stuffy nose

Its hardly my responsibility to dumb down the headlines to a level where everybody can understand them. This subject is nothing to do with cannabis, The two substances mentioned are now class 5 narcotics, cannabis was removed from that category, with the exception of extracts over 0.2% THC. Its all there in the OP

I think you may be on to something ,in fact I'm convinced. Further more I have never met a more materialistic nation of people than the Thais.despite the teachings of the Buddha. I guess they lost that page

just another pointless poll producing nonsense statistics which no doubt support the views of those who commissioned it. Nothing to see move along

It will be available to the public , just restricted to those who are sick, The opioid apocalypse is a different matter and is no excuse for denying these substances to those who need them.

it was a full moon on the 23rd some of them are still out and about obviously

duplicate

what particular mess are you talking about ? No prescription req'd and not available to those under 21 or pregnant, lactating women seems like common sense to me regarding cannabis. Which part do you have a problem with?

They are talking about prescription drugs, traditionally used to provide medical treatment to people suffering, Not really anything to do with "money and more money" unless one owns a pharmaceutical company

It will probably take the form of what's generally called a "prescription " unlikely to be raw opium, more than likely a product derived from it, You know just like almost everywhere else

I'm not so sure that's strictly correct, Around 10 years ago I suffered kidney stones. the pain was intense, the first thing they did on my arrival at hospital after checking my blood pressure and taking my temperature was to give me an injection for the pain. Not sure what it was but it certainly worked and as a bonus left me feeling high as a kite, Maybe the fact that it was a private hospital had something to do with it, not sure what a government hospital would do

No it wasn't ! What on earth are you talking about. Try reading the article, specifically the bit where it says...." Opium and psilocybin mushrooms, known for their hallucinogenic effects, are now classified as Category 5 narcotics, differentiating them from marijuana and hemp extracts." Cannabis was removed from the category 5 narcotics list, these two substances are now classified as such. it really isn't difficult to understand if you just read what's written and don't try to add your own personal take on things

The correct response from you would have started with the words " thank you for the advice"

that would explain why you sought Pseudoephedrine for a runny nose But be aware nasal sprays are not generally suitable for those under 3 years of age

they are only approved for "medical treatment and research" it states that quite clearly in the OP or so I thought

probably because that contentious issue has nothing to do with this thread,

I think you will find there are still penalties for trafficking or supplying , why hot give it a go , open a shop and see what happens

plenty of nasal sprays available that will clear a stuffy nose far better than Pseudoephedrine, Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride is the common active ingredient. Never heard of "vicks sinex" ?

For somebody who's user name includes the word "Dr" you appear to have little idea, Should medical use be deemed appropriate for certain conditions the dispensaries are already well established, us mere lay people refer to them as "Pharmacies" or "Dispensing Chemists" You're not a real doctor,are you?

what on earth are you talking about? I thought the article was perfectly clear , what part of "for medical treatment and research" do you not understand?