Bday Prang

"Doctors" controlling cannabis use! are you out of your mind hhahahhahaha exactly how would that be done? will they roll joints for people and limit how much weed is used ? or would they atempt to prevent inhalation? unbelievable

Its up to you how much you want to smoke, but paying 800bt per gram is a major expense, when consuming 68 g per month Personally I have overindulged at certain times in the past and have found that its quite easy to become immune to the effects especially with the newer high % thc strains. ( I never had the same problem with brickweed though) Just an Idea but have you considered a "tolerance break" just for a few days ? It would save you money of course, but even if that is not an issue, much more importantly it would give your cannabis receptors a break and enable you to experience the effects better when you resume, works for me, but its entirely up to you,

The alleged concern by some regarding the "youth of Thailand" is nothing more than misplaced virtue signalling and people grasping at straws . "ban it if only for the sake of kids and the mentally ill" etc etc Kids ( and everybody else) have always had easy access to cannabis regardless of regulations. Something that the prohibitionists don't seem to be able to grasp is that its always been available and always will be. I haven't heard any of these "concerned" people voice any opposition to the legal status of alcohol for the same reasons, Their "concern" for the youth of Thailand seems to disappear when they realise that it may impact their own consumption of the legalised and dangerous drug that they happen to like. They also complain on here frequently regarding any restrictions regarding the availability of alcohol that were put in place to protect kids Bearing that in mind , its (almost) understandable that objections are voiced from teetotallers, for obvious reasons ! but for anybody who enjoys alcohol to object to the cannabis legalisation is absolute hypocrisy and based entirely on fear and ignorance. After all 100 years of U;S funded "reefer madness" will not disappear over night They smugly post links to any anti cannabis propaganda they can find on the internet whilst dismissing any other relevant facts as worthless. However they all choose to ignore the fact that there is at least 100 times more information available on the internet highlighting the problems of alcohol consumption Realistically how can cannabis be illegal, and, along with its users be vilified when alcohol is legal and embraced, to the extent that abstainers often need to explain themselves and are often viewed with a mixture of suspicion and disdain? Surely If one is banned the other should be banned also As they say ...."people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" but I prefer "live and let live" I'm not advocating a ban on alcohol or anything else for that matter but in the interests of "fairness" maybe its the only way forward hahahahaha

so what?

all sounds a bit strange to me

bumbaclart never heard that one before but it sounds like the perfect adjective hahhaahaah

so you are prepared to allow the forum moderators to decide what is legal or not?

smoke it in the privacy of your own house (when the police are not there)

Reasonably easy to discredit that so called "review of studies" Just look at the phrase "5 to 10 milligrams per gram of THC" what does that mean ? 5 to 10 mg of what exactly, per gram of THC ? doesn't even make sense which is, as usual no surprise. A standardised dose of 5mg of THC !!! the only effect that would have is a placebo effect following the money would no doubt reveal the real reasons behind these reports that keep appearing. The various institutions need their funding and the "experts" will say whatever is required of them. to keep themselves in the luxury to which they have become accustomed I think we can expect a lot more b/s from these people over the coming months, I think we know who believes it and feeds off it

follow the money , there I would ! and Jeremy Corbyn did apparently ....but it was years ago when she was fit lol

Ah the "Bulldog" remember it well, Amsterdam used to be a brilliant all be it expensive place for a long weekend. I have seen hash advertised here but can't remember where I saw it , Shopee I think.

I'm sure there will be plenty of both but I don't like the idea of the big corporations moving in, although I guess its inevitable

It would stop you posting rubbish on here and maybe remove your misconceptions about it Thus removing your irrational but understandable fear of the unknown ! That would be a good start

Again. displaying a lack of knowledge regarding cannabis, a common trait amongst people whose limited knowledge is gleaned from the reefer madness school of thought. (which is the the common denominator amongst the puritanical prohibitionist zealots) It absolutely has to be true, as when your "education" or rather brainwashing took place, that was the only accepted narrative regarding cannabis wasn't it? Not unlike several other schools of thought in existence at that time but due to pressure brought to bear by the various minority groups who were on the receiving end of the accompanying prejudice that flourished, those views are now considered unacceptable in fact actually illegal

A kick to the head isn't very compassionate, but where does it say he is an alcoholic? It only said he was drunk

what motorbike ? are you drunk?

that's the job of the court

Other than keep out of the reach of children what more could you possibly want? Do you object to it being sold on budda days for example ?

well don't keep us is suspense "sir" please enlighten us

I doubt that things will ever be the same as it used to be pre 9th of june

I think it applies to all doctors.

I can guarantee 100% that regardless of legislation, personal recreational use will continue, as it has for thousands of years. Anybody hoping it won't will be bitterly disappointed

sort of "thanks but no thanks!

The legislation is already in place for mandatory helmets, if some people choose not to comply then that is up to them. As long as helmets are available for those that choose to wear them then there is no need for anybody to get upset

I never suggested that you did, only that your links are also to articles written or produced by people and organisations with their own agenda and as such are equally meaningless