Bday Prang

And don't forget the strange practice of adding a rainbow flag to the logo's of large companies and even banks, All terrified of being screamed at or boycotted. That virtue signalling rubbish didn't go down too well for "bud light" though did it? serves them right

In my opinion it is an acceptable compromise, they do not accept "he or him" which apparently is their human right, and I do not accept "she or her" which I consider to be my human right. "It or that" is gender neutral and is the most appropriate pronoun I can think of.

And in the UK people have been refused bank accounts for not embracing this wokism, some what more inconvenient than being refused a haircut! People with traditional values can be criticised, vilified. and insulted at will (Righwing extremists , Nazi's etc) for simply stating a scientific fact and not indulging the ridiculous fantasies of a tiny but very vocal minority And it is a tiny majority, how many of the angry protesting rainbow warriors that took to the streets were actually "trans people" ? very very few. the vast majority of them being professional ( but unemployed) whingers and "activists" just looking for trouble, the very same people that took to the streets burning shops and cars in their support for "black lives matter" and then subsequently glued themselves to the roads in their protests at climate change. The very same people who were throwing statues in to the sea in protest at "the slave trade" which ended 100's of years ago Then there is the issue of exposing children to this rubbish, some even advocating gender reassignment procedures to kids who are not even considered old enough to get a tattoo, the only brainwashing previously sanctioned for kids was religion. and that is bad enough, young minds are easily confused, and should not be polluted with matters of this nature, It is just wrong, to attempt to involve young kids in matters of a sexual nature. and would be illegal if the subject matter was traditional sexual practices, A genuine headcount of "men with tits" would reveal the true number of members of this tiny minority,, I agree that they should be allowed all the normal freedoms, but they should never be allowed to corrupt the minds of those too innocent to question the rhetoric,

"logical realism" rapidly becoming "the truth that cannot be spoken" how on earth has this been allowed to happen? Somebody on this thread even called it progress!

You and I will probably never meet one, there really is very few of them ,despite what their sympathisers would have us believe, There are probably more pedophiles walking the earth, and their numbers have been grossly exaggerated

So the concept that a man cannot be a woman is "hatred"

just because they are a minority is no reason to expect the majority to indulge them or their fantasy. Should "minor attracted people" be indulged too? Where would you draw the line ?

I'm not trying to fool anybody, unlike men calling themselves "trans women" female impersonators, each and every one of them, nothing more. If they won't accept "he" that is up to them , but it can never be "she"

No , the word "freak" would be hate speech, "It" is gender neutral, non pejorative and is as far as I am prepared to go, Really the only technically correct word would be "he" in this case, as confirmed by chromosomes, Anything else is just plain fantasy

common sense has no place in this discussion

I'll use whatever pronoun I want, it's not up them or you or anybody else

it looks horrific to me

The ones that have been castrated, are castrated males, or geldings, "dressing up" as women, but not actually women or female in any sense of the word. The ones that have not been castrated are just males "dressing up" as women, again not female in any sense of the word. it really is as simple as that. Anybody saying otherwise really has lost the plot.

A cat winning crufts ? previously and quite rightly impossible

even more worrying when you see their heads buried in their phones as they cross the road, or when riding a motorbike No need to buy them an actual I phone either, the cheapest "smart phone" is perfectly adequate for 99.9% of all people

Would not be surprised if a woman wins Mr Universe either,

So what's the betting that miss universe will be won by a man? I think the way things are at the moment that it is a strong possibility there will be a man amongst the first 3. as the organisers would not want to face the outrage and hysteria coupled with accusations of "right wing" intervention should that not be the case

especially in the eyes of real men

incidents like this will not contribute to the end of beauty pageants, even if they did how would it make any body "better off" You are still using capitals to express your outrage, just like a teenage girl

I would ride her like a stolen bike, I cannot say in all honesty that she should have won as I haven't seen all the others ,but she should certainly been placed higher than that bloke My comment about finding the people in the photo's unattractive was purely in response to the link to pics of "androgynous" models

we are on the same wavelength, There is a very good reason that the female impersonator has mannish features, It is also somewhat notable that even a makeover by presumably professional make up artists ( or more like contractors) has failed to hide these features. I'm guessing the demographic of the judges was very very "diverse" ie no women and no straight men, It is a really a slap in the face for the runner up, and indeed all the other females who took part. imagine how they must feel. Hopefully they are smart enough to realise that the judges decision was motivated by the current "woke" ideology, and is, as such , about as flawed as it can get.

My appearance is of no consequence so why do you ask? Let's just assume I am hideous, I still have the right to say what I find attractive and what I find unattractive. Or do you disagree with that statement? This "need" to see photos of other members who have expressed an opinion, or indeed ,their girlfriends is a bit creepy in my opinion

Men are superior to women in some ways, there is nothing narcissistic in saying that, Women are superior to men in other ways and there is nothing narcissistic in saying that either. The two genders compliment each other, equal but not identical, same same but different

personally I found none of the people in the photos on that link attractive. Average people have "average features" Good looking people have good looking features, and androgynous people have androgynous features

one way of looking at it , but on the other hand there is nothing about her that is actually female, "she" is a castrated male with male chromosomes. Which is fine they should start their own beauty pageant, if they haven't already. All this "controversy " would never have started, it's almost like they are being deliberately provocative And, if there is such a thing as "miss" trans whatever I will guarantee that real women are not invited to apply, although I doubt there would be many contestants applying as any real woman competing as joke, would be horrified if they actually won!