mikebike

15 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Whatever, the girls are not doing it so what happened to equality?  I am not against having a merger actually but against the hypocrisy. 

A merger would seem most logical but I think the two organizations are philosophically like oil and water.

In other news, the ROTW hopes the USA can start minding its home business and stop playing world police.

16 minutes ago, underlordcthulhu said:

You really have to be living under a rock not to see the huge conservative movements happening all over the world, especially the West given all the vacuums the Left created.

Anyway, just keep this in mind, leftists don't reproduce at the same rate as conservatives and there has been an awakening within right leaning men to reproduce at an even higher rate than previously seen.

Is that really you Kanye?

53 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

The PC minority that thinks it's 'OK' for boy scouts to accept girls whilst the girl scouts do not accept boys.

You think that is more likely than the fact that the BSA’s loosing membership in droves over the last couple of decades and needs to expand their base?

49 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

Explain "100% more applicants" please. 

Currently only boys or 50% of the child/youth population. Add girls, another 50% of child/youth population, and you get a 100% growth in the base of available children/youth to bolster their failing enrollment. It’s been my point all along... it is more likely this move is to save their falling enrollment than some sort of corporate political correctness.

28 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

Except women overwhelmingly voted conservative in the last US Presidential election.

 

Hence, minority, and wouldn't ever capture 100% of anything. 

 

Most people do actually believe that boys will be boys, and girls will be girls, and both science and popular opinion confirm both. 

Sorry, what does voting have to do with the BSA opening up membership to 100% more possible applicants?

9 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

I think they are unequivocally pandering to the extremely liberal left-wing weirdos in an attempt to capture a minority demographic. 

Or, more logically, they are looking to expand their enrollment base by 100%.

11 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

The extremely liberal left-wing weirdos. 

You think that’s why the BSA wants to ramp up female membership? Couldn’t be their enrollment dropping like a rock the last couple of decades, eh?

2 hours ago, BobBKK said:

What a weak, weak bunch of PC 'leadership'.  And Girl Scouts next?  Boys Brigade?  Hu-MAN?   where will it end?  a bunch of minorities holding sway over the masses it's outrageous we allow this to happen and is why people vote for megalomaniac Trump because they have HAD ENOUGH. 

 

Anyway what has BSA motorbikes got to do with the Scouts?

Which minorities are holding sway over the masses?

39 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Think I understand what you're trying to say. However, personally, I would not define people attracted to Islamist ideology / neo Nazism as 'warriors'.

Yeah, that post/thought was awkward...

I agree, I would not define them that way as well... but this is how they self-define and is significant in their life choices.

1 hour ago, FreddieRoyle said:

Can you offer an explanation as to why the guy's recent conversion to Islam made him plot terror attacks? Is there something about Islam that encourages its followers to attack people, or is his recent conversion to Islam merely coincidental and if he had converted to lets say Rastafarianism or Buddhism he would still be compelled to attack non believers?

Didn't the OP clearly state he was attracted to the IS version of Islam because of the fighting? So he had a desire to be a fighter and then looked for the extremist branch of the religion which suited he desire. The key being he was looking for a fight and looking for someone to justify and inflame his personality flaw. Some of these youngsters end up with IS some with the neonazis. The point is they are looking to be warriors before they find their justification.

Wonder who is crafting the paper-trail. 45 better have accountants better than his lawyers!!

5 minutes ago, meinphuket said:

These economic migrants should be returned to the first country of entry ie. Mexico which is considered a democratic nation, and apply for asylum there. The American pie is only for legitimate migrants, not illegals.

So if I am understanding you, if these particular migrants/assylum-seekers were Mexican you'd be fine with it, correct?

12 minutes ago, poanoi said:

i do not disturb or steal business opportunities just cause i feel like using their

chairs, and i do have a tremendous back pain.

if i do chose to sit and occupy their property, i make damn sure to order something

to justify me sitting there right away.

i do not have the nerve to just spoil their business at my leisure

Again, that is trespass, not loitering. My response was to a poster calling them loiterers.

I just don't see any political will in any of these other countries to do what you suggest. They just  do not have the same issues with migration that the USA does. These countries are not having their populations drained as you imply.

3 minutes ago, jimmyyy said:

They broke the rules, they should be paying starbucks.

Weird that Starbucks does not agree.

6 minutes ago, CharlesSwann said:

I'm thinking Central American countries would agree to the deportation process. Mexico doesn't want these caravans travelling through either. And their countries of origin presumably don't don't want their population drained. It would only be temporary in any case, until the people get the message.

There seems to be no evidence to back your theory that any central/south American countries would be amicable to forfit their sovereign rights to the USA. In fact most discussion seems to point to the polar opposite.

3 minutes ago, ezzra said:

In litigious America there must be by now a bunch of people just waiting

hoping and praying to be harassed, discriminated and dragged of

a flights just to be able to sue for millions....

Just NOW? This seems to have been a form of occupation for some for decades. In both personal and corporate litigation.

CharlesSwan:

You do realize "the other side of the boarder" is a soveriegn country where the USA has no jurisdiction to "place guards" or transport anyone anywhere, right?

12 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

You tell me. 1st, name the crime you're referring to since humping isn't 1, then find the statute.

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/time-limits-for-charges-state-criminal-statutes-of-limitations.html

We have been discussing "defamation" as introduced in your post which I replied to.

9 minutes ago, smedly said:

is this a wind up post 

 

lets say you own a coffee shop and someone walks in sits down at one of your tables opens a laptop using your free wifi and refuses to buy anything

 

you ask them to leave and they refuse...……………….what next ?

 

only one option

That's trespassing not loitering.

1 hour ago, skorp13 said:

Out, get 'em out! No entrada!

Sorry to be so cold blooded about this but the U.S. can not be taking in the disfortunate from other countries while it so grossly continues to ignore its own. Also these people need to be vetted properly for their backgrounds as well as any prior criminal history and we can't have them wait on the U.S. side of the border where they can commit crimes against U.S. citizens

If you know how bad it is for disfortunate US citizens in the greatest country in the world imagine what it must be like for the disfortunates in shithole countries without the resources of the richest country the world has ever seen and without the US's robust human rights laws...

6 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

You should read the article before posting. Seems she couldn't remember a whole lot of details but suddenly, 6 yrs later it all becomes clear? 

I am well aware of the facts. Just a simple answer for your simple question.

Question for you: have any statutes of limitation run out?

Question. Why is loitering considered a "crime"? Has anyone here ever loitered? If yes, do you feel like you were committing an incarceratable offence?