treetops

So they can realise the value of it when they're needing a good care home in later life (unless their children try to take it away as the OP appears to be wanting to).

Where have you guys got these different reasons for the change from? I don't know the newpapers' sources, but they indicate the change was down to the high levels of Beta variant which is at odds with all the above. https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/green-travel-list-canada-denmark-21412106 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/travel/red-amber-green-list-changes-21411707

Reportedly due to the prevalence of Beta variant which the vaccines struggle with.

That requirement can be waived by an officer of sufficient rank (and bribability if that's a word).

I didn't have a question. Scanning the QR code on the paper takes you to the same information on the MOPH website as displayed by the app. A possible alternative for the poster without a smart phone.

The venue could scan the QR code on the paper copy to match it up with some other ID.

Show the paper copy. The app accesses the same information on the MOPH website just in a more user friendly (for most) manner .

The latter will usually not result in the international transfer annotation. She's right. It does however have an influence on Wise who then use a procedure which ends up with the transfer being marked as international when it arrives in your Bangkok Bank account.

Use the "ID Card Number" on the paper vaccination record and you'll be able to register on the Mor Phrom App.

The OPs plan will result in his mum getting a basic (low) level of care from the local authority paid from their coffers. Realising the value of her house will allow her a much more comfortable time in her final years. I know which one I want for my mum and it won't involve me filling my pockets.

Even they would not currently count for entry if the vaccinations had been administered under the Thai program. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-quarantine-when-you-arrive-in-england#rules-if-youre-fully-vaccinated

None there either. Crossing from Laos at Mukdahan Friendship Bridge gives the option of ALQ there, and at Aranyaphet you can use Prachinburi ALQ. I have not heard of any such arrangements at Nong Khai.

Do you have a debit card you can use?

There are no ALQ hotels in Nong Khai according to the list here: http://hsscovid.com/

It's not the vaccine type that's your problem, but the fact they'll be administered in Thailand that currently rules all of them out. Currently only US residents vaccinated in the US, and people vaccinated under the UK or EU programs with approved vaccines get preferential treatment on entry to the UK. If I were you I'd go for AZ or Pfizer as I reckon there's more chance of them being approved before the Chinese ones, or bite the bullet, go to the UK without vaccination, do the self isolation and get vaccinated in the UK.

Not sure where the OP is from, but this is only valid in England. Anyone travelling to other areas of the UK will have to do the full 10 days.

Yes. Although you could reduce it in England at least using the Day 5 Test to Release option.

Example of a typical certificate in this thread: https://aseannow.com/topic/1227839-vaccine-passport-or-proof-of-vaccination-for-overseas-travel-anyone-got-this/

Thread has been re-opened. Super Admin. ???? Did Line process the request automatically once it had been installed or did you have to do anything?

I have seen some references, including from the TAT, that you must be at least 21 days in your departure country prior to travelling to Thailand for the Sandbox process. Did this requirement make it to the final cut as I don't see it mentioned on the Thai Embassy London website list to issue a COE?

Travel with both passports and show whichever one is required for the purpose at hand. People do it all the time for immigration purposes so should be OK for proof of vaccine purposes too. I would also carry a (translated?) copy of your marriage certificate to help link the documents.

There will be financial influences I'm sure, but I would think it's just as much avoiding getting sued if they condone something that hasn't gone through the testing regime for the proposed application, and something subsequently goes wrong. Similar in a way to the recommended gap between vaccines being 3 weeks and nothing else, as that was what was used for trials, when outside experts knew longer would be beneficial and that's how it's turned out. He has history of troll like behaviour and not much in the way of smarts.

That is what I was hinting at above (extra bolding): " . . . the routing and place of purchase are major contributors to the geographic based choice of who to check and who not too." This is from Emirates T & Cs (see the last sentence) and from well over 50 flights I think I've been asked once, which is why I wouldn't risk it.

If so, they're not from the same system as regular Thai ID numbers. You can check the validity of Thai IDs online, and although the one previously posted verifies OK, another one I have from a mate's certificate doesn't. Checking site: https://formvalidation.io/guide/validators/id/thai-identification-number/

I think you may find one or two on line if you're lucky. Maybe you could post links if you think this is commonplace? Agree, and I understand the routing and place of purchase are major contributors to the geographic based choice of who to check and who not too.