Susco

https://weddingknowhow.com/engagement-ring/solutions-when-your-ring-spins/

2 minutes ago, Logosone said:

That means I do not have to hold crypto to make money from crypto, and I can also short BTC, so if it falls I can make money, and if it goes up I can make money.

Sure you sound like a winner, only you lose when it goes up when you have shorted it, and vice versa.

12 hours ago, internationalism said:

my vax list for this year is mmr, influenza, prevnar, hep A, thyphoid, zostavax, tdap+polio, varicella, meningo.

Also boosters for TB and dengvaxia and later boosters for the rest of them.

They are all very safe safe and they partially protect against covid.

As a back up i have 3 insurances and stock of 10 medicines for prevention and cure of covid.

I am not planning covid vax untill they reach generation 10, which at this speed would be only 3 years. 

Developing a vax takes 10-15 years. Dengavaxia was created over 20 years.

 

I haven't had any of them ever, and guess what, I can't recall when I have been feeling unwell for longer than 24 hours, and got over it with anything else than going to bed early.

4 hours ago, OttoPollmann said:

So, this was a good decision not to straighten the short cut for drunken Somchai. Otherwise he would hit the temple with full speed in his Fortuner. 

He will still hit the temple, as he will take no notice of the curve, and may be airlifted while going at speed over the soft part

16 minutes ago, Pilotman said:

Oh, I forgot to add, that as a farang, you are always, but always in the wrong  and you will pay, regardless.

No you are not, but I notice you couldn't resist your usual Thai bashing

No need for vaccines, Thailand will go into history as the first country that has reached herd immunity through infection.

Looks like they are preparing the numbers for the 7th of June, when there will be a lack of vaccines, so they can say we have reached herd immunity and don't need vaccines.

First step in that direction made yesterday.

8 minutes ago, snoop1130 said:

while the budget for the Defence Ministry is 50 billion baht more than that of the Public Health Ministry,

I guess they are preparing for when

2 minutes ago, Thairakrot said:

 

 

Seems a change for the 5 years ones last couple of months....

You know in Thailand, he who has the most convincing force sets the rules ????

Proven many times over when dealing with government departments

6 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

Unfortunately rules have changed. Always needed since a couple of months.

Also the form has changed and some self-declaration.

I wasn't aware there is high blood pressure tested.

My last certificates were written after I could stand on my feet at the reception desk.

Not seen a doctor at all.

Wasn't aware of the change of rules. My last renewal was end of December at Banglamung, and no question about medical cerificate.

I'm safe for the next 6 years

1 minute ago, Thairakrot said:

I had 4-5 licenses here.  Always had medical.  All previous ones in Chatuchak.  This time in Nakhon Pathom.  I wish you were right, but Im afraid not

I'm having Thai driver license for the past 23 years, only time I needed a certificate was when I got my first license.

Look  for another DLT if they ask for in Chatuchak

17 minutes ago, Thairakrot said:

I went to a local clinic today for med cert for drivers license renewal. 

You don't need a med certificate for license renewal

2 minutes ago, trainman34014 said:

May will look different with Factory closures already and maybe more to come.

How many of the many thousands of factories in Thailand are closed?

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Ryan754326 did not claim that a majority of the population had already been infected. So you're agreeing with yourself.

It all depends on how you read it. My understanding is that he suggested that previous infections add to the immunity. When I see that the US has 33.6 million TESTED infections, then I'm sure that the real number of asymptomatic infection is much much higher. So i guess in the US, and most other countries that had high infection number last year, the majority of the population has had it.

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

That said, being previously infected does confer quite a bit of immunity although vaccines generally provoke a stronger immune response. 

You have any credible source for that? I guess not, because we know how many people have been vaccinated, but we don't know how many people have been infected, because not everyone has been tested, and also not everyone needed medical care when infected.

7 minutes ago, mjnaus said:

Could it be that, bear with me as I know this is really really farfetched, every time crypto has taken a dive over the past 13 years, within a rather short timeframe it reaches a new ATH?

 

Short timeframe? 

End of 2017 it was at an all time high of 20K, the next month it went to 10K ( quite some dive) and even went lower in the next almost 3 years

1 minute ago, The Cipher said:

What I find difficult to accept is that - prior to now - you've treated your position as de facto correct and have generally refused to engage in any meaningful discussion on why crypto assets may or may not have value.

My opinion is that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value, and I have that opinion for many years already, so I don't see any reason why I would change that view.

I have posted that opinion when bitcoin was 20K and also when it was 60K, and unless you can post a credible source, which shows the intrinsic value of any crypto, I will keep comparing them with the tulip mania or a Ponzi scheme.

1 minute ago, The Cipher said:

 

I am up on my crypto allocation in general, but am about 33% down on some of the new positions that I bought into during the recent dip.

 

But dude, you are literally a walking example of confirmation bias. You regularly trumpet articles that support your views while overlooking anything that does not. More than that, you add materially nothing of substance to this conversation because you either refuse to, or unable to, engage with nuance.

 

Have asked this before and will ask it again. Specifically what is your background/qualifications and what is your financial track record, that you can claim with such certainty to have an information advantage over everyone else? ????

This is an internet forum, and in case you missed the definition of it, here is it again.

A website that provides an online exchange of information between people about a particular topic. It provides a venue for questions and answers and may be monitored to keep the content appropriate. Also called a "discussion board" or "discussion group," an Internet forum is similar to an Internet newsgroup (see below), but uses the Web browser for access.

I didn't notice any mention in the forum rules when I signed up, that I needed some qualifications or certain degrees to post or start a topic.

So yes I quote articles that confirm my OPINION, same as you do, but seemingly you can not agree that someone has a different OPINION as you, and everybody is only allowed to quote articles that share your views.

Maybe better you move on if you can't live with that.

2 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

But none of the people who were in it for the past years already, were buying at these prices, unless it was simply hedging prior profits from alts.

And you know this how? Do you manage everyone's portfolio?

First of all, if people were not buying at 60K, it would not reach 64K, so definitely people were buying at those prices and have now a 50% loss.

On this forum nobody (except @Heng) will admit that they bought and are now saddled with a loss, but you will see them come out of the woods in droves, in the unlikely case it get way above 60K anytime soon.

The tulips are wilting, dispose of them while you still can

3 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

All of those people do not seem to realize that the OG buyers all got in at around 3500-6000 dollars per bitcoin and similar to alt coin prices in 2018 ish.

You mean nobody got into Bitcoin at 60K, and was screaming 100K would be the next stop?

Sloppy is also much better in regard to fake goods and scams as their counterpart.

I had a seller banned last week, however I hadn't even bought from him, but it was obvious that it was a scam.

I sent an email to sloppy, and 3 days later he was gone, and i received a response that he was banned from the site.

With Lazada, I bought last year batteries from 3 different sellers, which were counterfeit, presented them the proof I had received in writing from the respective brands, and as of today those sellers are still selling the same counterfeit batteries

5 minutes ago, Crossy said:

does Sloppy have an arbitration system like its parent Fast Forty Thieves? (OK - AliExpress)

Sloppy isn't Chinese, but yes they have some kind of arbitrage system.

In fact they don't release the money to the seller until you click received, or about 1 week after you received the goods in case you don't confirm.

When you make a claim during the set period, it is Sloppy who makes the decision, not the seller.