CorpusChristie

4 minutes ago, Sujo said:

wrong. Its discretionary. Always has been.

No, Policeman cannot decide who they want to arrest

Its their duty to arrest law breakers , 

That is why we have a book of laws, 

Part of the UK policemans oath 

 "and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property;"

6 minutes ago, simple1 said:

You're just posting more support for right of centre terrorism. I had previously read it is against forum rules to express support for any form terrorism, don't know why you and others are permitted to post your propaganda  - bye.

I am posting facts , nothing to with support of the people or terrorism  .

1 minute ago, simple1 said:

First line is enough reason to ignore you. bye...

Here is a more balanced view from the BBC .

Right wing terror related arrests went from 6 % to 10 % of all terror related arrests

Teenagers posting on-line about kidnapping Prince Harry were part of that group who have been arrested .

  The reason for the increase from 6 % to 10 % is that the Police now monitor more websites and have introduced measures where people can report posts (to them).

  Has there been a increase in right-wing activity or are the police now just paying in more attention and therefore a higher arrest rate ?

   Are the Left  Ant Theether mob trying to portray all the statue defenders as being far right extremists and part of the biggest (growing )terror threat in the UK ? 

  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-49753325

4 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

 

The number of far-right prisoners convicted for terror offences in Great Britain climbed by a third last year to their highest recorded level, and accounts for more than one in six of all terrorists held in prison, according to official figures.

Yes, it went from 9 prisoners to 29 , many of these seem to be youngsters posting "encouraging" messages online .

People will no longer speak to each other , they will just send written messages to each other (like I'm doing now )

1 hour ago, joecoolfrog said:

Enlighten us as to what precisely Thailand has done to safeguard its citizens that the UK did not.

Closed the borders to foreigners entering , the UK still allows people into the UK from highly infected areas .

Closed down all public transport .

Enforced curfews 

1 hour ago, Jimbo53 said:

The same thing should be happening with Expats on Retirement Extensions stranded overseas whom have their Primary residence in Thailand,its outrageous that these people are not allowed back to their homes.

Where you passport is from is where your home is 

4 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

How many, you think, would love it to return to their very prosperous ancestrial lands, to the decendants of those, who sold their ancesters into slavery ?

None, because if they wanted to go, they would have gone already .

There's nothing stopping them from going 

4 minutes ago, evadgib said:

This 'little skirmish' was far bigger than they'd have us believe...

Indian Army had over 100 soldiers injured, dead or captured 

4 minutes ago, VBF said:

That's sad! I can understand it if you're a tourist - when I'm in Thailand I spend much of my time in bars, chasing the ladies of the night, lazing at the swimming pool etc etc and about the only other thing I do is read.

 

But here in UK which is my home I have plenty of hobbies.

 

I cut short my trip in March when CV19 was getting serious enough for the FCO to advise all Brits to return home.

Since I've been back, there hasn't been a pub or restaurant open but I've hardly had a boring day, in fact some days I run out of time to do what i want to do.

Boredom is all in the mind and sadly, a sign of little imagination........IMO, of course

TBH, I was being sarcastic .

I dont go to bars and pay for company even when bars are open

25 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

No the UK was not OK before we joined the EU.

The UK was the basket case of Europe.

What is that based on ?

21 hours ago, zzzzz said:

 

 

As long as returning thais keep bringing covid back with them, dont expect to see the country opening anytime before sept

Returning Thais go in 14 day state quarantine 

13 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Already answered this. Read the thread. 

Which numbered post , I will go back and read it 

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Nope. 

OK

10 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Didn’t read beyond your false claim I smeared anyone. Show me the post where I did that and I’ll read the rest. 

Its OK, he didnt suggest that you did .

He just stated that you should take care not to do it (in future)

You can now read the rest of his post

On 6/18/2020 at 8:34 PM, Ron jeremy said:

I hear all this BS on this site of how great things are in Thailand and they are so happy they aren't stuck in the west. Curfews, beach closures, booze bans everything closed. I'm sure glad I got the fark out in time, friends stuck there assure me it was- is no place to be, and that I made the right decision going home to where things ARE great!

our government has takin great care of its people, monthly cheques, no one is starving lined up for food etc. 

Which has resulted in Thailand close to being Corvid virus free and now we are virus free, things are getting back to normal .

  Are you from the USA, where the virus is still rife and out of control ?

Until your Country gets the virus under control , you wont be allowed into Thailand 

54 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I don’t know, however the point is moot.

 

I’ve already said I’m willing to accept the financial hit if any of my investments turn out to have such a sordid history that they end up paying reparations. 

Which would result in less monetary return for you ?

Shrewd investing ; Dont invest in Companies that were involved in the slave trade because profits may fall if repatriations are made 

5 hours ago, simple1 said:

Completely ignored  "fastest-growing terrorist threat in the UK". Again deny / deflect and so on. Some more info...

 

 

 

I didnt ignore that , I addressed that . I replied to it , I answered it and I didnt dent it .

57 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

I'm not campaigning for anything.

What "justice" do the campaigners seek ?

What are they hoping to achieve ?

8 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

BLM and anti fascist demo at Hyde park tomorrow at 1pm, no thugs or hooligans counter protest this week as they got a kicking last week lol.

What "Justice" are you campaigning for ?

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Denying of extreme right terrorism is telling.

That is what was stated in the Guardian link you (or someone else) posted 

One of the right wing terror incidents was a 14 your old boy posting on-line about foreigners , another reported incident was when a person wouldnt give his password to the police .

  Those are facts , and I was nt denying right wing terrorism, I was explaining how they got their figures

4 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Well thats plain wrong. The police determine who they shall arrest with guidance from above. 

 

It is not for the public to decide what should be done.

No, they must follow the law , if a person breaks  the law, they should be arrested , nothing to do with anyone "above" .

  The public don't decide, nor should anyone above , the written law should decide