CorpusChristie

19 minutes ago, elliss said:

 

       Remove the control of the establishment . 

         The New generation , do not bow ..

Earn it , dont steal it 

Just now, tribalfusion001 said:

The police were there separating them and wouldn't been a fair fight anyway. These people were not rampagers, 300 young people having a peaceful protest and got hurled abuse for doing it.

No, there were 150 Defenders v 300 attackers .

If they wanted a fight, they would have got one .

The police wouldn't had been able to stop it .

No violence at all , yes they were peaceful protests , but, would the attackers gone on the rampage if the defenders werent there ?

2 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

No one needs to respond, they are looking for a fight. Brain dead white chavs, not my type of people.

They claimed to be there to protect their town, just incase the protestors went on the rampage .

  Considering there was no violence , you are wrong with your allegation, if they wanted to fight, they would have, but, they didn't 

34 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

. They are only there to hurl racist abuse at people and start a fight.

You said ^

They said

"It's believed those opposing the event were standing there to protect the town's war memorial after seeing statues defaced in other protests across the UK."

1 minute ago, tribalfusion001 said:

White males guarding memorials from mainly black activists, doesn't look good and they shouldn't be doing it. It can be classed as vigilantes, same thing is happening in the USA but armed with assualt rifles.

Stop obsessing over race , it doesnt matter what colour anyone is .

You seem desperately trying to turn this into a race war .

This is nothing to do with race , there are a racially mixed  group of protestors and a racially mixed group of defenders .

  You are probably trying to turn it into a race issue , so you can call the defenders *racist* if theres any disturbance

1 minute ago, tribalfusion001 said:

So it's going to be mixed ethnicities protecting the memorials? If that is the case, then great.

It doesnt matter what ethnicity  they are  , what difference would it make what colour they are ?

17 minutes ago, Morch said:

Being behind bars where blacks are over-represented, or being released on bail with current situation and public coverage. Choices, choices.

...................and an ex-cop as well 

31 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

Most of them probably don't even know who the statues are.

Many of them would have had Family members who died in the Wars and thus the memorial is dedicated to their deceased Family members, the ones that didnt come back .

12 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

If they cared that much, clean the sh*t from them with their horrible Millwall and Leeds shirts lol. I wonder if ethnic minorites are allowed to join them or it is just white boys protecting the memorials!

Football lads are not racist , there are many ethic/Black football lads .

Some of the top lads are Black 

4 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

Do these same protectors clean the statues every Sunday morning from poo and mold, probably not. Most of them probably don't even know who the statues are.

LOL, they are not going to clean the memorials , they are going to the memorials to stop them getting smashed up and vandalised by antitheers

7 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

I've been on two of these Facebook groups Antifa Public Watch North and British Patriot News, both are right wing and the comments are quite colourful. The only reason these football fans/thugs are going is for a fight, nothing to do with protecting a piece of brass collecting dirt and pidgeon poo.

No, the sole reason for going to the war memorials is to protect them from thugs  .

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How it actually works he goes to court for a bail hearing and is/is not given bail privileges.

 

It is not unreasonable, given the nature of the charges and the public sentiment, to expect him to be held pending trial.

 

I rather hope the prosecution challenge the bail and that he is held until his trial.

 

 

He would only be refused bail if they think he may commit another crime , he would interfere with the court proceedings or he would flee .

  If the Court is satisfied he would not do any of the above , he would be given bail 

9 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

They were and hasn't changed much now.

Things have completely changed since then , even changed a lot in the last 30 years , completely changed since when Churchill was about .

7 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

You have a problem with ripping down a statue to a slave trader?

Spoken like true person of privilege. 
 

It wasnt what they were doing that bothered him, it was the "mob rule" that concerned him .

The facts that gangs of people are running around causing destruction and theres no rule of law

2 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

So overweight bald men with tattoos.

How stereotypical ........................and wrong .

Young guys , not fat ,  full heads of hair , dont know about  the tattoos

14 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

I agree, they are pointless. I would prefer something modern in their place, give the spaces to modern artists to showcase their sculptures. It could be linked to the Turner prize.

 

He is up next today at 5pm.

The Ant Theethers are re-arranging the UK , could well be social disorder

10 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

He couldn't get his lighter to work properly.

The flag would have been flame retarded ..........flame retardant............... errmmmm the flag would have been fireproof

2 hours ago, Logosone said:

I don't mean muslims, I mean Arabs.

 

Malaysia is full of Arabs. The entire condo I was at was like Dubai central. Huge families with scores of obnoxious children.

Was your Condo building complex named *Malaysia* ?