CorpusChristie

9 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Already answered this fictional representation of the BLM protests. 

How did 49 Police officers get injured last week in London ?

10 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

Somebody probably did make that up

11 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I watched the news and didn't see any rampage or attack on London.

 

There was some acts of idiocy, but nothing like the violence exhibited by those 'defending rights of statues' yesterday  

Last weekend, 49 Police officers got injured in London by the BLM group and there was property destruction and they were expected to do the same yesterday 

11 minutes ago, KhaoNiaw said:

Paul Golding is a convicted far right terrorist leader and he was there. 

He refused to give the Police the pin number to his telephone and they charged him with terrorism offense and he got a conditional discharge  , that is his terrorism offense 

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

That's an idiot setting fire to a flag, it's not BLM attacking London.

 

He was part of a large group that went on the rampage in London , it was on the news last week

4 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

You are justifying this? 

Unbelievable. 

I am quite sure that it isnt true and that no one was attacked whilst having a picnic in the park 

6 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

They didn't attack London, they protested against racism and inequality.

Attacking a London war memorial 

Just now, possum1931 said:

Does Johnson not know that Churchill was responsible for the starvation to death of more than 3 million people

in Bengal?

No, the drought was the main reason for the Bengal famine 

Just now, Bluespunk said:

No they didn't. When did BLM "attack" London?

Last Weekend 

17 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

The headline is very misleading and judgmental. Far right is OK but anti racist is actually very racist. I suspect mostly are far left anti-fa mobs bent on anarchy. The average law abiding black person is left out.

They were not far right groups though

Just now, Bluespunk said:

No they weren't

They did previously and its very likely they would do it again 

3 minutes ago, robblok said:

That is the police its job, and if the black lives matter had a city permit to go there then they were in their right. No need to take the law into your own hands. 

Last week the Police failed in their job and let the Ant theethers run riot , if the Police would not protect the war memorials, then the people will 

They were not far right groups , just people protecting Londons heritage from attacks  

2 minutes ago, robblok said:

Of course not they are allowed to protest too, but they should be sensible about it and make sure the protests are not in close proximity. Its only stupid to do such and will lead to violence. By doing so they clearly show me they are out for violence. I have seen the same thing in my country when there is a protest for something. Then you got a group who is against those protests showing up causing trouble and making sure violence is started.

 

If you don't agree have your own protests but not at the same site. How hard is that.

 

We had the same with soccer fans, some would celebrate a victory and then the other side started to come to disturb it and cause violence. Just shows that they are out for violence and dont care about protests.

They were they to protect war memorials from Black lives matter attacks and vandalism 

10 minutes ago, robblok said:

In laymans terms a counter protester who probably was there to cause problems and violence. I mean why they **** they need to antagonize each-other. Just stay away from the black lives matter protests. 

 

 

Because the BLM group were intend on attacking the City . 

6 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

"A Black Lives Matter logo will also feature on shirts for the remainder of the season, along with a badge thanking the NHS for their work during the COVID-19 crisis.

They are sports shirts , they shouldnt be used to promote political causes  

2 minutes ago, Kadilo said:

I know it’s difficult to comprehend but some things move on from the original clause. Not a hard concept to comprehend really. 

So, Ant Teethers have hijacked the protests about a black mans death and turned it into their own personal crusade .

  You are using Geroge Floyds death to further your own Political causes