placeholder

They were "trapped" Did the Poles prohibit them from emigrating?

It's notable that when questioned about Hitler's stance on the issue of Jewish influence, you kept curiously mum. Now you're referring to some truth about the cause of WW2 that can't yet be told in polite society. This kind of evasive language is what anti-semites use.

Clearly, you have an agenda. Why not make it clear what you're referring to? Instead of offering inscrutable characterizations.

Here is a quote from the letter that I assume Cameroni is referring to: "I say from the onset: Your former president warned you previously about the devastating Jewish control of capital and about a day that would come when it would enslave you; it has happened." https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ubl2016/english/To the American people.pdf

How about his view that Jews wielded too much influence in Germany?

You left it way too easy for him to evade the point of your question.

You should publish the results of your research in The Journal of Because I Said So.

another veiled reference?

comments like these are generally a veiled reference in support of anti-semitism.

"Nazism adopted controversial policies on meat. On the one hand, it banned vegetarian associations; on the other hand, Hitler and many Nazi officials professed their vegetarianism. Moreover, Nazi Animal Protection Law protected animals from the same tortures that the Nazis inflicted in the concentration camps." https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750635215618619?download=true&journalCode=mwca#:~:text=Nazism adopted controversial policies on,inflicted in the concentration camps.

He was good to his dog.

And some members of aseanow, too.

It depends on how different the demographics of the Teamsters differs from the demographics of the nation as a whole. I suspect it's mostly male, mostly white, and mostly not college educated. 3 demographics where Trump does very well.

Keep on repeating those innuendos about Biden. After all, even among Republican legislators, they ultimately went nowhere.

And Italian Americans immigrant ancestors should have returned to Italy to fight the mafia and corruption and And Jewish Americans immigrant ancestors should have stayed and fought oppression, and all the other millions upon millions of immigrants seeking refuge in America from oppression and poverty in American should have stayed in their homelands rather than emigrate.

While it's undeniable that Melania Trump is beautiful, exactly how does she qualify as gracious? Definition of gracious: "marked by kindness and courtesy a gracious host b : characterized by charm, good taste, generosity of spirit, and the tasteful leisure of wealth and good breeding https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gracious

Let's try to remember that there is no inherent conflict between being a democracy and being a republic. The US is a representative democracy. It has a Constitution that sets for the limits of what laws that democracy can enact.

It's thanks to the conservatives on the Supreme Court that huge amounts of cash have entered the political system "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other associations... In a dissenting opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens argued that the court's ruling represented "a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government".[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC Should Democrats roll over and let only Republicans take big donations from the rich?

You sure about that? https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/ https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/kamala-harris/

Yes it would make more sense for the Ukrainians to help Harris given Trump's history of hostility to Ukraine and his bromance with Putin. As for Nordstream...terrorisim? Who was murdered in that explosion? Whereas we know Putin is murdering abroad those he perceives as enemies.

But the Justice Dept going after such a person certainly contradicts the narrative of a corrupt Biden administration. And of course, there is no good evidence of Joe Biden being corrupt. Of course, some lame brains keep on writingthe "Biden crime family" as though that were some kind of evidence. James Comer couldn't even convince enough Republicans that there was adequate evicence to show that Biden had committed any crimes..

When claims about the Iranians helping Kamala are made, Trump supporters believe them. When claims about the Russians helping Trump are made, then they claim it's fake news. In both cases, what makes sense to look at is whether or not these countries believe which candidate it's in their best interest to help. Especially given that there are no genuine legal obstacles to either of them doing whatever they think is necessary.

And of course, if your theory is correct, that means that the Justice Dept is investigating Democrats despite their political connections. As it has done with Senator Robert Menendez, who has been convicted, and Henry Cuellar, a Texas Democrat.

Maybe you should read what you write before you make such a clear. Here it is again "Very close with Joe Biden, apparently. Just two blue collar guys..."

Another acolyte of the Donald Rumsfield, the guy who helped get us into the Iraq war under false pretenses. Here's his well-known quote: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." In other words, according to your way of thinking, anybody can allege anything, and if there's no evidence to support it, that's irrelevant.