placeholder

It's such a pity. He really needs our help.

I believe he has me on ignore so he still doesn't understand that this ridiculous lawsuit and assault on the first amendment was quashed bya judge.

The area was policed by French, British, and Italian troops, and overseen by an Inter-Allied Commission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1921_Upper_Silesia_plebiscite Not yet under the authority of the Polish government. That makes 3 for 3.

Actually, condemning the well deserved court judgement against Alex Jones' vile lies in the Sandy Hook case is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

This is a farce. You're quoting from the website of the Attorney General of Missouri who was suing Media Matters over claims that it manipulated algorithms on X and used that to solicit funds from Missourians. Clearly, it's the Attorney General who was in effect doing the equivalent of court shopping. And what you might note is that I put this in the past tense. It's clear you didn't check that dates of the lawsuit and what followed. Missouri AG’s legal war against Media Matters shot down by federal judge Judge: Missouri AG's actions chill speech about extremist content on Musk's X. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/missouri-ags-legal-war-against-media-matters-shot-down-by-federal-judge/ What's clear is that when it comes to suppressing free speech, you're a big fan.

And yet, the only evidence you provided was for incidents that took place before there was a Polish goverment.

These women faced death threats because of Giuliiani's lies.

possibly more entrepreneurial.

Even if the USA was better under Trump was that because of or despite Trump. You should really get yourself acquainted with the logical fallacy called "post hoc ergo propter hoc" "after this therefore because of this".

So many strolling down the memory lanes of their imagination with that defunct monster.

Alex Jones is not being sued by the grieving parents of Sandy Hood because he was allegedly right time after time. He's being sued because for years he claimed that they were actors paid by the government and that the slaughter of their children never happened. And it's clear you don't understand there's a difference between being sued for slander and/or libel in civil court by private citizens, and being prosecuted in criminal court for exercising one's right to free speech in criminal court by the government.

I wasnt' referring to Trump. But now that you mention it, it is his supporters here who seem to be Hitler's fellow travelers.

And, Lord knows, the Slavic peoples had no reason to hate the Germans after the War.

Yes, Poland also has a sorry history of anti-Semitism. But far far removed from the kind of horror that the Germans inflicted.

Well that figure is disputed. The German Historical Museum puts the figure at 600,000, maintaining that the figure of 2 million deaths in the previous government studies cannot be supported.Die Flucht der deutschen Bevölkerung 1944/45, dhm.de; accessed 6 December 2014.(in German) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944–1950)#cite_note-14 And, that" inter alia" (shouldn't it be "inter alii") means that those deaths were not attributed to Poland alone. (In fact, Russia was responsible for most of those deaths.) Which was not unexpected given that the Germans murdered 6 million Poles of whom half were Jewish. And of course, there is that little matter of Nazi ideology which designated Slavs as sub-humans. You know, that little bagatelle called Generalplan Ost which called for the extermination of 10's of millions of Slavs. All of that might be considered by anyone but the most stalward supporter of the Nazis as an understandable incitement for rage and revenge.

Which is why you still won't say if you agree with Hitler that Jews wielded too much influence in Germany.

Here you go again. You must think that I'm not going to follow the links you provide. This uprising took place in the wake of WW1 when Germany still controlled this territory. It was a revolt against German rule. Not a Polish government attack on ethnic Germans.

The roots of the zombie claim that Hitler had ‘Jewish blood’ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/03/roots-zombie-claim-that-hitler-had-jewish-blood/ What is significant is that you apparently access sources that dish out garbage like that claim.

Here's the snippet you quoted: "Trump would be a better leader of the USA" And here's the sentence in full" "AFAIK Kamala Harris is not a convicted felon, a convicted sex offender nor a serial liar as Trump is, and YOU seem to truly believe that Trump would be a better leader of the USA." It's dishonest to cut quotes in a way that alters the meaning of how they were used. But then, you're a fan of Alex Jones.

The blatant anti-semitism in both is just a coincidence then?

Almost everyone supported Hitler? He came in second in the 1932 elections.

You referred to the Bin Laden letter as being like Hitler's speeches because it was "dangerous." How so? And you still haven't answered if you think Hitler was correct in claiming that Jews wielded too much influence in Germany.

No. Only if they offer anti-semitic explanations. Is yours one of them?

You really think that you were going to get away with making that misleading quote? Or maybe you just forgot to include this? "Standing in the path of the German army's advance during the early days of the invasion, tensions quickly escalated in Bydgoszcz between the city's sizable German-speaking minority and its Polish majority.[1] On 3 September, as the Wehrmacht was preparing to assault the city, members of the German minority working in conjunction with the German intelligence agency (Abwehr) attacked the Polish garrison.[1][2][3] " In other words, according to your potted version of history, Germany invaded Poland to defend Germans who were being attacked by Poles because of the German invasion.

Sure. That's why you reference that anti-semitic Bin Laden letter. That's why you refuse to say whether or not you agree with HItler that Jews wielded too much influence in Germany.