placeholder

Why don't you start your own thread instead of trying to derail this one?

An intellectually vacuous statement.

Or you can emerge from that dark cloud of ignorance you dwell in and learn that none of the authorities in the position to do something about climate change are recommending drastic overnight solutions. If you bother to do a little bit of web surfing you could learn what means of remediation are being enacted or proposed.

So, to your way of thinking, there's a massive conspiracy by climatologists to disseminate falsehoods about climate change. Conspiracy thinking is the last refuge of the cornered and clueless.

In other words, you've got nothing.

There are also various chlorofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide, and ozone. I guess at at lease some H2O can be considered anthropogenic in that as temperatures rise the atmosphere can hold more of it. So the excess would be an instance of anthropogenic forcing.

What shocks me is the inability of some people to understand that the level of H2O in the atmosphere is self-limiting. Get back to us when the atmosphere starts precipitating CO2 and methane.

Sorry. I conflated your post with another member's. However, you still haven't cited any source for that ridiculous claim that somehow assigns the responsibility for the current rapid pace of climate change to Krakatoa. Making things up much?

What's even worse, she mockingly imitates people with physical handicaps. And she insults women about their looks...oh wait...that's not her...

You sure about that? Does the Democratic post Dobbs special election overperforming apply to the presidential election? First, let's note the trend. Democratic Party candidates have outperformed polls in 58 special elections by an average of 3.8 percentage points ... But as Daily Kos Elections Contributing Editor Daniel Donner has researched extensively historically, there has been a strong correlation between special election results taken in aggregate and general elections for the US House in November of the even-numbered year. Now, maybe this year is going to be an outlier, or maybe that historical correlation will simply come to an end, but at this point, there are going to be almost no more special elections between now and November. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/9/21/2271935/-Does-the-Democratic-post-Dobbs-special-election-overperforming-apply-to-the-presidential-election-Y

So, you think American workers earn too much? And you're counting on Trump to take care of that?

It's funny. Scientists have detected a weak positive correlation between a logwarming and solar activity. But the thing is, for the past several solar cycles, solar activity has actually been very subdued. Just during this last cycle has it picked up. And as I pointed out, the effect would still be weak.

Thank you for sharing your feelings with me.

But other factors count Elevated levels of CO2 from climate change may enable plants to benefit from the carbon fertilization effect and use less water to grow, but it’s not all good news for plants... Nitrogen limitations Researchers that studied hundreds of plant species between 1980 and 2017 found that most unfertilized terrestrial ecosystems are becoming deficient in nutrients, particularly nitrogen. They attributed this decrease in nutrients to global changes, including rising temperatures and CO2 levels. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2022/01/27/how-climate-change-will-affect-plants/

No wonder Melania always poses in such carefully lit photos with artfully applied makeup.

Impeach Doug Emhoff. Also anyone who a civil court has decided has committed rape.

It's obvously implicit in what you wrote. For instance "ban combustible engines". What authorities have proposed banning combustion engines in the short run? Or "no more ships transporting goods around the world." Over time, these modes of transportation can be replaced. But to state it baldly without qualifications as you do is just ridiculous.

And, as Helene showed, it's not just coastal regions threatened by hurricanes. As the atmosphere grows warmer, it can absorb more water leading to widespread and destructive flooding.

What's that got to do with your ridiculous assumption that change is going to be drastically over a few years? As for the Krakatoa thesis, what lunatic source did that come from?

Someone else who doesn't understand rate of change.

Says the self-appointed referee.

Some else who doesn't understand the crucial difference between change and rate of change.

Anyone you know personally...that's a great recommendation.

Actually, neither Harris nor Trump has a good record on free speech. Unless you believe that Trump's call to take away the licenses of various broadcasters was done in the defense of free speech. "Trump likewise champions freedom of speech for himself and his allies while attacking it when it protects his critics and political opponents. If Trump had his way, flag burners would be jailed, purveyors of “fake news” would lose their broadcast licenses, and news outlets would have to pay him damages when their coverage strikes him as unfair. Only “stupid people,” Trump averred in July, think flag burning is a form of constitutionally protected expression, as the Supreme Court has twice ruled. Those “stupid people” include the late Justice Antonin Scalia, whom Trump described as “a great judge” and the model for his Supreme Court appointments." https://www.ocregister.com/2024/10/10/neither-harris-nor-trump-is-a-friend-of-free-speech/ Anyway, why does an obvious non-American like you take such an interest in American politics?

Clearly, reading is a challenge for you. I never wrote that Democrats don't gerrymander. Just the republicans do it a lot more. And that they're even willing to violate the law in Ohio to do it. You're the one who raised the issue of court packing. If it's not a real thing, why did you raise it? And if it's not a real thing, then why does it have a definition: the act or practice of packing (see pack entry 3 sense 1) a court and especially the United States Supreme Court by increasing the number of judges or justices in an attempt to change the ideological makeup of the court https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/court-packing And given the right wing nature of the current supreme court, it's not surprising that it would disagree with the 9th. But what is shocking is that the justices on the 5th court are so incompetent that even the right wing Supreme Court consistently shoots their arguments down. As for climate change...you unloaded a bunch of phrases with no coherent connections. I assume you are referring to some right wing characterization of Harris' program. That kind of code may make sense to you but for those of us who don't engage in the conspiracy theory sources and such that you resort to, they make no sense. Such characterizations don't count as evidence. Evidence is about facts, not about characterizations. And I still get a laugh out of your claim that total FEMA aid to those afflicted by the latest disasters was limited to $750. As for me being a foreigner, by which I guess you mean a non-citizen of the US, it's not me who clearly lacks a basic understanding of the First Amendment to the Constitution. That would be you. No genuine American citizen could possibly be so ignorant.