placeholder

By your reasoning, it wouldn't be aggressive for the United States to build island and claiming economic zones there as well. Except for China, all those countries are claiming islands and governance is areas adjacent to them. And closest to them.

This bogus tactic of yours, which you repeatedly employ, namely misrepresenting the positions others by introducing things they never said , is just more evidence of what little you have to offer The issue isn't whether the Court is indifferent to Constitutional issues. Rather the issue was your claim that the court invoked some kind of Constitutional grounds to disqualify Biden's student loan forgiveness program. It didn't.

The difference is, as noted earlier, the Filipino people are overwhelmingly opposed to China's aggression against their country. And they have a far more favorable view of America than they do of China

No. I am certainly denying your earlier claim at the courts somehow invoked the Constitution to decide against biden's plan. You need to keep track of what you claim.

One could argue that someone who invokes what a real would do when it comes to legal issue is someone not to be taken seriously.

You'll have to provide better evidence than your characterizations. Links?

False. Please provide evidence that Biden ignored a court order.

And l you're missing the point. Vance endorsed refusing to obey a court order and defying the Constitution.

False. They they did not fire civil servants and replace them. Only political employees which happens with every administration.

No.

Even worse. It's as bad as reality. Which is not a coincidence.

And how thoughtful of trump not to warn as many supporters who bought the stock when they went public that in fact it was doomed? Good thing he doesn't know the majority of the shares which he got for free because otherwise people might accuse him of being a grifter... oh, wait a minute...

So that's why the folks at Trump Media wereaccusing short sellers of conspiring to drive down the price of the stock?

Is that because Trump has vowed to pursue an isolationist policy? So what could be more daunting for China than a US President who will stand by and do nothing in the face of Chinese aggression? Well, maybe it's unfair to say do nothing. Maybe he'll raise tariffs even higher.

Here's something else that Vance said: "Mr. Vance said that if he could give Mr. Trump one piece of advice, it would be this: “Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state. Replace them with our people. And when the courts—’cause you will get taken to court—and when the courts stop you, stand before the country, like Andrew Jackson did, and say, ‘The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.’ ” https://archive.ph/BUSpM That's how much Vance respects The Constitution.

Thank goodness there is no historical correlation at all between Christianity and anti-semitism. Europe under 'Christianity was for most of its history an epoch of goodwill and respect from Christians towards the Jews. In oppositeworld.

Because "the child is the father to the man?" Thanks for showing us that not only is the issue of citizenship a non-starter, so is your sloppy thinking.

Actually, not so accurate. They tend to be a bit simpleminded since they give all polls equal weight. It's true that RCP is funded, not just by conservatives, but by extreme right wingers. They also own the notorious westernjournal.com. That said, their aggregation method, while it's a bit simplistic, is very open. I think it has a pretty good record.

Well, that was because I based my search on looking for someone who had been sentenced to 3 years in prison according to you. I should have known better than to base my search on an assertion of yours. Just to remind you, that the party in question was sentenced to serve 8 weeks, not the 3 years that you claimed. Edit: This posted almost simultaneously with JonnyF's post above.

Because of how Russia has prospered under his rule?

Well, he is a dictator, after all. Apparently, that's the kind of leader you admire.

Well, Truth Social has broken its old record. Go Team Go! ahttps://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=5d0a88e40784a59a&sxsrf=ADLYWIJ-gADxST3E9z73O3F8mN_lr3YbEw:1724821617295&q=djt+stock+price&source=lnms&fbs=AEQNm0BHe81ENDqBETLQnY7GvZ6DKUcIylne0I28qzCfQXwtcYlTAodTr1Xa_rScOC6YSHC26-Ta4NLLiKAenh9N6KJmruc_9izoG7sby9WzR6TEEa1IB8qpzYTf1AAomW7W3t608oowZjr4X2z4TnvViEkT4l-hklNsADC2KoFvvXc-UpoHV6SrErMQv0xLln91sGttnmqKbuN2zvCO9-9xFMVA-L5rug&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjt1bKe9ZaIAxW8xzgGHQGDBA8Q0pQJegQIExAB&biw=1536&bih=751&dpr=1.25

It was Aileen Cannon who made the ruling. The same judge who had previously been rebuked by a pane of 3 judges, including 2 very conservative ones, for her incompetence.

The main fighting now is in the Donbass. How quickly you forget what happened in February of 2022.

Amazingly backward comment. Given Putin's actions, no need to go after him for his Facebook comment. As for those calling for rioting and murder on Facebook, freedom of speech isn't absolute when it's posted to promote criminal activity. As it has been recently in the UK.