placeholder

And the US did take further steps after the Nordstream 2 was stopped. Steps that did not consist of sabotage of the pipelines. Nothing in what Biden said that in any way proves US responsibility for the sabotage.

I see you have no answer to the blatant lies told by Russia What Zelensky actuall said was he didn't think Russia would launch a war. You think that makes Zelensky dishonest? As for the Minsk accords, Russia maintained that it wasn't bound by them since it didn't have any troops in the Donbas. It is to laugh Got any more falsehoods to share with us?

Silly me. I'll go with what the expert says and not withsome unbacked aspersions cast by an anonymous party on asean.com.

Another argument against Biden's participation in his son's ventures is that why wouldn't China use that as blackmail to keep him in check? Biden has been far harder on China than Trump ever was. Keeping advanced chips out of China's hands is a major blow to China's economic development.

I think the strongest case against Trump is the illegal possession of documents. That seems very cut-and-dried. Also obstruction of justice charges in denying possession of many documents. There's not much if any room for semantics in this case.

Rubbish! And I am especially qualified to make that judgement since I have never watched a football game in my life and am therefore completely unbiased.

Do you understand that you are crediting the Russian government with committing truthfulness? Right through Feb 23 they denied that they were going to invade Ukraine. Then, when they invaded Ukraine they claimed it was for the purpose of denazification. This is a country where calling the invasion of Ukraine a war can get you 15 years in prison. Why would anybody believe what Russia says?

Do you think I could get aseannow.com to pay me $150,000 per year for what up to now has been a waste of my life?

More evidence to show Musk is in way over his head. You Can’t Code Your Way Out of the Culture Problem On Friday afternoon, we learned that Elon Musk had asked any of the Twitter employees who “actually write software” to “email [him] a bullet point summary of what your code commits have achieved in the past ~6 months, along with up to 10 screenshots of the most salient lines of code.” As VP of technology at Slate, my first thought when I read this was “what a tremendous waste of engineering time.” Second only to “that’s a lot of bullets to read.” https://slate.com/technology/2022/11/elon-musk-twitter-code-fixation.html (if you get blocked by paywall, use link in Chrome's "incognito mode" or equivalent in another browser)

The UK's finance minister has said he recognises that Brexit has brought trade barriers with the EU, but rejected calls for Britain to rejoin the single market, arguing that most obstacles can be removed over time. Jeremy Hunt's comments come amid a growing clamour from the business world for Britain to re-enter the European market that enables free trade via common rules and standards. His acknowledgement of numerous obstacles is in sharp contrast to Boris Johnson's assertion, as prime minister in 2020, that his newly-struck post-Brexit trade deal would bring "no non-tariff barriers to trade", and "if anything allow our companies and our exporters to do even more business with our European friends". https://www.euronews.com/2022/11/18/brexit-jeremy-hunt-admits-uk-eu-trade-barriers-but-rejects-rejoining-single-market

I believed that it was incriminating for the Trump Organization to have done nothing to Weisselberg after his fraud was discovered. I must apologize for spreading misinformation. It turns out that they did do something. They gave him a raise. Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg got a raise after fraud was discovered https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-trump-organization-tax-fraud-eric-don-jr-20221118-ud3zfzdhn5gz3jwvzy5goxndfe-story.html

Trump explodes at special counsel appointment: ‘I am not going to partake in it’ “They found nothing, and now they take some guy who hates Trump. This is a disgrace and only happening because I am leading in every poll in both parties.” https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3742413-trump-explodes-at-special-counsel-appointment-i-am-not-going-to-partake-in-it/ Does Trump believe if the Special Counsel gets a grand jury to indict him. he has the right to refuse to attend? Or that if found guilty he can refuse to partake in the sentencing? Does Trump have any clue at all about how the legal system works? Well, to be fair, he does understand how to go about filing frivolous lawsuits. Also, he manage to lie at least 2 times during his interview.

Did you note that Russia doesn't allow access to Ukrainian POWs while Ukraine does allow access to Russian POW's. And as the report notes, the Russian soldiers were mostly badly treated in the early stages after their surrenders. So yes, both sides do it, but as the far more comprehensive report I cited shows, the Russians do it a lot more. And that they deny investigators access to their POW camps is absolutely damning.

As pointd out in this very thread, Bobulinski has an unhappy history of having such a claim debunked by the Wall St. Journal.

Might be pretty hard considering it took you almost a day to produce the figures. I just wish I had your sticktoitiveness. Anyway, thanks for evidence that such data exists.

I see you still can't bring yourself to acknowledge the falsehood of Bobulinski's claim that he had incriminating evidence against Biden. And this comment "I would have and Im not even a public figure." shows how unfamiliar you are with the U.S. Law. It's far more difficult for a public figure to win a defamation case than it is for a private citizen.

In Trump's candidacy speech in Florida he was caught out in several lies. In just one speech!

And, of course, as the Wall St Journal analysis showed, Bobulinski is not exactly a trustworthy source.

You didn't even thank me for providing a link to the article. And while it's true that they discussed the "big guy" there's absolutely no evidence that Biden ever received any money. We do know that Hunter and James Biden are sleazy and often invoked Joe Biden's name to others in promoting their ventures. So while they may have made all sorts of plans involving Joe Biden, there's no evidence that Biden was aware of those plans or that he took even a nickel from these people.

Yes, that's what people remember about his election day lies. It was the one about the weather, not about the size of the crowd. Another post from an alternate universe.

Really? https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/list/?category=&ruling=false&speaker=joe-biden Fact check: A look at Biden’s first year in false claims https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/20/politics/fact-check-biden-false-claims-first-year-2021/index.html Fact-checkers suddenly rip into President Biden heading into midterms CNN fact-checked 9 claims the president has made in recent appearances https://www.foxnews.com/media/fact-checkers-suddenly-rip-president-biden-heading-midterms The false and misleading claims President Biden made during his first 100 days in office https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/biden-fact-checker-100-days/ A Bottomless Pinocchio for Biden — and other recent gaffes https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/07/bottomless-pinocchio-biden-other-recent-gaffes/

Being blond and white probably only took a couple of years off of her sentence. What has happened to the America I knew and love?

Well, it's good to see that you agree the articles you linked to don't offer any incriminating evidence against Joe Biden. Good for you!

I've posted this information more than once. Hunter Biden’s Ex-Business Partner Alleges Father Knew About Venture Former vice president says he had no involvement; corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden https://www.wsj.com/articles/hunter-bidens-ex-business-partner-alleges-father-knew-about-venture-11603421247

Maybe the Republicans should take their case to the Australian legal system. I've read that they have judges & juries there composed entirely of a certain marsupial.