Danderman123

Typical foreigner advocating terrible policies for the USA.

What part of her story do you think is true? Did she go to his hotel room?

The issue is the illegal campaign contribution. What the money was used for is irrelevant except for context. Also, Trump's attorney claimed that Trump never had sex with Stormy Daniels and so opened the door for her testimony.

I said "determining facts", which is what a jury does. So far, the testimony supports the prosecution and Trump's defense - so far - has not been able to attack witness testimony to the point where their credibility has been damaged. Usually, if the prosecution's case is proven, the defendant is convicted.

Classic MAGA: Attribute behavior of a small group to an entire social group. By the same logic, you are a criminal insurrectionist because January 6.

You seem detached from reality. The trial is about determining facts, and the witnesses are doing a good job of presenting the facts to the jury. You MAGA types can spin all you want, but, absent a holdout juror, Trump will be convicted.

If a conventional news outlet makes a factual mistake, they usually make a correction. MAGA outlets simply double down.

There are more recent examples of how early polls aren't predictive. You can ask President Giuliani.

So far this year: I have stayed out of Thailand for 3 and a half months, and I have only transferred into Thailand my monthly Social Security pension, plus a couple of small ATM withdrawals. So my Bangkok bank account is growing - if I stay in Thailand in 2025 for the entire year, I should have enough in the bank that I don't have to transfer in any money except my pension. I am preparing for the worst case scenario that the RD prosecutes tax evaders in 2025, and Farangs in the village are sent to the monkey house for not filing tax returns. Last note: I just remembered that the Non-O retirement visa renewal requires sending in a bank book as part of the package, so the 800,000 baht requirement is checked. This allows Immigration to review incoming bank transfers, so it would be trivial to check against RD records to check if a tax return has been filed. No idea how this will work for those who use an agent to obviate the 800,000 baht in the bank requirement.

In July of 1988, a Gallup poll showed Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis leading George H.W. Bush (then the incumbent vice president) by 17 percentage points. The period after the conventions and around Labor Day is when most voters start thinking about the election.

The facts show that Trump is guilty, but the overall story may be what convicts Trump - that Trump hid key facts from the voting public before the 2016 election. No one can deny that Trump engaged in a lie to win the election, and the jurors may convict for that. Hey, Trumpers, anyone of you deny that Trump hid facts from the voters in 2016? Cue "what about"........

Live by the early poll, die by the early poll.

You can take it up with the authorities in New Zealand. Your opinion means nothing when it comes to US policy.

We'll wait for you to read your links. You're going to be disappointed.

The reason you claim Biden is anti-Semitic is because that is precisely what Trump is accused of. It's the old Goebbels playbook, accuse what you are guilty of.

This guy doesn't love Joe Biden: Who is Nick Fuentes and Why Is His Antisemitism Dangerous for America? Yep, this guy is a friend of Trump's. So @Yellowtailis just engaging in projection in his post: describe Trump but claim the behavior is Biden's. Yet another technique invented by Joseph Goebbels.

If we have a new, and more lethal pandemic in the future, the COVID Deniers are going to disappear quickly. Conversely, the rest of us, having learned lessons from the last time, will do much better. Let's hope that never comes to pass.

He's an anti-vax conspiracy theorist now.

That's an excellent legal defense for a murderer. "Your honor, yes, my client killed the victim, but what's the big deal? Everyone dies".

I would be happy to come over and turn off the alarm for you, if only to let Darwin have a win.

The anti-vax types don't care if kids die, as long as they can own the libs. Some don't care if *they* die, as long as they "win".

And when the kids are infected, other family members get sick and some die. Carry on.

When you say "there is nothing for prevention in that vaccine" you are wrong. Moreover, you have fallen into the fallacy that unless something provides 100% prevention, it's worthless. Seatbelts are a great example. They don't provide 100% security, but they are good enough that you wear one when you are in a car.

It depends on what day of the week he is talking.

I don't really watch TV, sorry. Maybe Rachel Maddow once every couple of months.