Danderman123

He should have thought of that before insulting the judge.

If Trump avoids the judgment, his assets will be taken from him. Federal judgments are no fun. And Trump is broke, so there is that.

The Trump fans don't care about Reality. For them, reality is defined by Trump.

When the polls show Biden leading, you will claim they are fake.

The isotopic data shows that the increase in atmospheric CO2 from 280 to 430+ ppm is manmade. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/how-do-we-know-build-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere-caused-humans Do you have any data to the contrary?

I post about the data, not the personalities. You can't discuss the data since you flunked Science back in the day.

Your post is predicated on there being an underlying problem that requires mitigation of the amount of pollutions people generate. You decry government programs to reduce pollution, and then propose government programs to reduce pollution. So, you advocate socialist efforts to combat Global Warming.

Classic Conspiracy Theory. Most scientists collect data. They get paid regardless of what their data shows. A scientist who "suspects" something after looking at the data may lose their jobs for any number of reasons, but the data is still there. Do you have any *data* to show that underseas volcanos cause ocean warming? Spoiler alert: volcanos cause short term cooling.

The planet is warmer. Carbon dioxide is increasing. That's not a model, that's reality. Maybe you can't handle reality.

Trump really, really wants to avoid having to post a bond for the appeal. He's even offering to testify again in a new trial. As if Ms. Carroll's lawyers are going to agree to that. It must be embarrassing to be a lawyer for Trump. Every time he gets a crazy idea, they've got to file it as a motion. Even though they know it's crazy, and they feel stupid presenting it to the court. We should start seeing motions from the plaintiff seeking enforcement of the judgment soon.

Before the usual suspects start posting about scientists who are only in it for the big bucks, let me state that this particular wildfire was primarily caused by hot weather. Weather is not the same as climate.

Ms. Willis' defense is that she paid her half in cash, as was her practice. The charges are pretty weak tea.

Dubai. Malaysia's not bad.

This is commonly stated by inmates of mental facilities. You really need to provide specific data, otherwise, you are just parroting some talking point.

"Alabama, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Wyoming, and, the state with the highest prevalence of 10.6 percent, West Virginia." The states with the highest percent of Science Deniers.

Getting back to the topic, why hasn't Trump posted bond for his appeal?

Most Thai women I know live on FB. That's where they show off the gold their boyfriend gave them.

Trump still can't post bond for the second verdict. It looks like Trump is having money troubles. You'll know it's bad when Mercedes leaves him.

"And how much does Ms. Willis make?" Jones asked. "Two hundred and something thousand a year," Merchant said. "So your argument is that a person who makes $200,000 a year is actually setting up prosecutions to go on a trip that costs $3,500," Jones observed. "That's your argument?"

There were auto gates for Thais, but on the other side of the escalator were autogates for people with passports with chips (ie "Epassports"). But the staff were directing people away from those gates. I told them my passport would work, but when I got close to the gate, I saw a hand written sign indicating that using the automated gate would cancel a re-entry permit.

It is a certainty that when Trump falls behind in the polls, you will be claiming that the polls are fake. Then, when Ttump loses the election by the same margin predicted by the polls, you will claim that the election was fake.

Blaming the banks for Trump's fraud indicates you have been conned.

Unless you can demonstrate an increase in sea-floor vulcanism that accounts for the ocean warming, you are off topic.

I'm not talking about models. The planet *has* warmed as CO2 increases. Even you know the Greenhouse Effect is real, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that adding more CO2 into the atmosphere is going to cause more warming. If you disagree, can you provide some facts to the contrary?

Nope. You obviously don't understand Science because you are not sufficiently competent to explain why you think Science is wrong. I could and have listed the proofs that Global Warming is manmade, but you can't deal with the facts, and instead post insults, claim that scientists are only in it for the money, anything but respond to facts. That's because for you, facts are only real if you are told them by your Leadership, mostly expressed via the talking points they send you.