Danderman123

This Reuters photo provides a glimpse of the future.

Because you think there is a giant conspiracy to support the Global Warming hypothesis. Meanwhile, you can produce zero evidence why the planet is warming, if it's not from greenhouse games. Anyone who believes in a conspiracy with zero evidence is a nut job, in my opinion.

Emotional language doesn't help published science get past peer review.

Posters with no explanation why temperatures are rising posting garbage to fill space.

Human production of carbon dioxide has increased atmospheric concentrations from 280 to 430+ ppm. The article describes the impact of that increased CO2 on ocean temperatures.

Congratulations! You have discovered that heat rises!

The Greenhouse effect was first discovered over 200 years ago, do you think that guy was in it for the money, too?

I can explain why the planet's temperature is rising: Humans have produced so much carbon dioxide that atmospheric concentrations have increased from 280 ppm to 420+ ppm over the last 100 years. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the lower atmosphere. Therefore, human produced carbon dioxide is warming the atmosphere (and oceans). Whereas, you have zero explanation for the warming.

I suspect that construction of prisons for transgenders might be advisable

I've actually never been to the Plank Inn, but I've heard about it. I lived nearby. BTW, are you drunk?

You don't believe data from the City of San Diego? Where is your historical crime data coming from? If you can't answer, fail.

I have a personal interest in this story, because I am a founder of a company going through a SPAC. So, I am sitting in Trump's position, although at a slightly lower scale. I don't know if the SPAC deal will go through, I don't know how valuations are generated, it's a big mystery to me. And then there are the dreaded lockout provisions. Allegedly, Trump has tried to eliminate his lockout, so he can sell stock quickly. But if he sells too much, the share price would collapse.

From the OP: "The global warming caused by fossil fuel emissions is a primary driver of the rising ocean temperatures.". So, what's your point?

Ocean temperatures are rising due to man-made carbon dioxide: https://skepticalscience.com/How-Increasing-Carbon-Dioxide-Heats-The-Ocean.html

So, do you have evidence that solar activity dropped during the years you listed above?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_San_Diego The crime rate in San Diego is the lowest its been in decades.

The Sun has an enormous impact on global climate. Increases in solar activity have produced significant warming. However, we are in a period of decreased solar activity. Also, there are other natural forces that are promoting a cooling trend. I would describe them to you, but maybe you can remember them from Science class. As for why warming isn't in the form of a straight increase year after year, the question demonstrates a basic lack of understanding of the difference between climate and weather. And then there are short term inputs like volcanos that cool the planet for a short time. I am becoming convinced that you Deniers simply failed Science and are trying to convince everyone that your teacher was wrong, not you.

Sure I can: Humans have produced so much carbon dioxide that atmospheric concentrations have increased from 280 ppm to 420+ ppm over the last 100 years. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the lower atmosphere. Therefore, human produced carbon dioxide is warming the atmosphere (and oceans). Easy peasy.

Are you qualified to tell us WHY the planet is warming?

The border crisis is so severe that Trump says it can wait until next year.

How about Congress appropriating some money for border security?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_San_Diego The crime rate in San Diego is the lowest its been in decades. Someone is lying to you.

Trump's dementia is getting worse, and impossible to cover up. He could go to Venezuela for treatment, except he can't say the name of the country. Fun fact: during Reagan's second term, his Alzheimers was advanced, and he was lucky that his wife was capable of guiding him around and telling him what to say. Nancy Reagan was the de facto president for Reagan's second term and she was a Democrat, so things worked out well. I can't see Mercedes doing the same for Trump.

Hey Trump fans! Where's Donald's money? I thought he was a billionaire!

When Hunter Biden testified, Comer never asked a question, and left early. Apparently, he knows the Hunter Biden stuff is a dead end. Your assessment about Comer's "investigation" has been wrong for months ago.