Danderman123

No part of the Presidential Records Act protects either a former President or VP from charges for possession of classified documents. Trump won't use the PRA in his legal defense. He is just posting about it to fool the rubes.

What part of the PRA protects Trimp? You must know you are lying about the PRA, since you can't back up your claims.

One Republican prosecutor made the claim.

Aren't you the guy who lied about the Presidential Records Act, and how it allowed Trump to retain classified documents? Why should anyone listen to you?

Who is "he" and what court did "he" deceive?

You only think you were talking about 2028. Harris will run for President in 2028, and will have tough competition. Harris - Haley in 2028?

Trump did, and lied about it during the 2016 election.

You don't think that Russian interference in the 2016 election undermined democracy? Please tell me you don't think there was any Russisn interference.....

If global temperatures continue to rise as CO2 levels increase, trees will grow in the Arctic. But, by then, cities such Miami and Bangkok may be abandoned. You know that increases in CO2 cause global warming, right?

In 2028, VP Harris will have to run against other candidates in the primaries.

The stutter has always been bad.

You are living deep in a world of hypotheticals. Biden has been cleared by a Republican Special Counsel. This "news" story will self-destruct in 24 hours.

Biden cooperated with the authorities. Trump hid classified documents in response to a subpoena.

What's your point? Is it that CO2 is about 400 ppm in the atmosphere, so it's not significant? According to ACGIH [1971], Patty [1963] reported that hydrogen cyanide at 110 to 135 ppm (120 to 150 mg/m3) might be fatal to man after 0.5 to 1 hour or later, or dangerous to life; 45 to 54 ppm (50 to 60 mg/m3) could be tolerated for 0.5 to 1 hour without immediate or late effects

Climate scientist Michael Mann wins defamation case against conservative writers "Michael Mann, among the world's most renowned climate scientists, won a defamation case in D.C. Superior Court against two conservative writers. Mann, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, had sued Rand Simberg, a policy analyst, and Mark Steyn, a right-wing author, for online posts published over a decade ago, respectively, by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review". Strangely enough, I know Rand Simberg quite well.

Or you have an inability to understand the difference between cooperating with authorities, and hiding documents from the authorities.

fixed https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-agent-mcgonigal-pleads-guilty-russian-oligarch-rcna100073

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-agent-mcgonigal-pleads-guilty-russian-oligarch-rcna100073 Head of the FBI Southern District of NY during the 2016 election.

I am not claiming that Biden declassified any documents in his possession.

Climate can change due to natural forces, or human factors. Do you disagree?

Repeating a lie does not make it true. Unless you believe Joseph Goebbels: "Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”.

Yep. Biden has to demonstrate he is with the program between now and the Democratic convention.

This is now a mental health issue for you. The Presidential Records Act not only doesn't protect Trump, it forbids a president from taking documents after they leave office: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Records_Act# "Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office." Also, there is no provision in the PRA that protects the president from being charged over possession of classified documents. As I said, this is a mental health issue, since the provisions of the PRA are widely known. So, you can respond in several ways: The rational response is to prove me wrong, and failing that, admit you are wrong. The crazy way is to double down, without proof. Maybe throw in an insult. Or, simply ignore your error. The last 2 alternatives are for particularly crazy trolls.

You don't believe the Special Counsel when he explained the difference between Biden and Trump in their handling of classified documents? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/08/why-trump-was-charged-biden-wasnt-according-special-counsel/ “It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear,” the report reads. “Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts.” “Most notably,” it continues, “after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.” In contrast, the report continues, Biden cooperated fully.

What's your source? A talking point you saw on FOX? Fact check: Biden did have the authority to declassify documents as vice president