Danderman123

For onesies or twosies, yeah, they are hard to detect. But, mass voter fraud would be easy to see.

But there is no evidence that the 2020 Georgia election was stolen.

Unless you believe that the voting machines are rigged, a receipt should be sufficient. Do you have any evidence that voting machines are rigged?

Up to you. But, there is no evidence that the 2020 election in Georgia was stolen.

Typically, you are given a record of your vote. More to the point, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the Georgia election, or any other recent election. You do understand that Trump and his minions were lying about voter fraud?

Typically, you are given a record of your vote. More to the point, there is no evidence of any widespread vote fraud in Georgia. Do you disagree?

Again, you don't seem familar with the election process. Rather than believe Trump, you could volunteer to serve as a poll worker.

There is significant public insight into election data. Perhaps you have never chosen to look into it.

I have the impression that you are not that familiar with election systems. Maybe you have never worked in an election precinct. It's almost impossible to cheat in an election by altering or printing ballots. Election fraud is usually a case where someone votes twice, but not enough to impact an election. The idea that someone could dump pre-printed ballots on Election Day (or before) is crazy, since anyone doing so would have no idea if any voter in their batch had voted on Election Day, and any duplicates would be flagged by election authorities. There were 4 cases in Georgia of someone voting twice. Each precinct is monitored by workers from both political parties. If the final voting rolls don't conform to what they saw on Election Day (or during early voting), the poll workers will notify authorities. In short, there are significant barriers to widespread election fraud, and Trump's people never demonstrated a single precinct where there were fraudulent votes. Of course, Rudy Guiliani claimed that poll workers were dumping pre-printed ballots, but later he admitted he was lying. Despite that, you still believe Rudy's claims. Can you point to a precinct in Georgia that had significant voter fraud? If you can't, why do you still think that the election was stolen? Does Trump have that big an influence on you?

Here's a question: Do you believe the Covid pandemic of a few years ago was a hoax?

Is Joe Biden talking about Covid mandates now?

I have a question for you: Do you believe Rudy Guiliani and Sidney Powell's claims that the 2020 election was stolen?

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/dead-wagner-boss-seen-new-30828099 You're not going to believe this.

The Russian certainly had a hand in providing Rudy Guiliani with disinformation about the laptop.

You are free to complain once mandates have been issued. Until then, you are just snowflaking.

How long before the Trump cultists claim that its not Trump's fault, the idiot sons were running his business?

Recommendations are not the same as mandates.

The story has internal contradictions.

The problem for Trump is that declared value for assets should be the same when filing for bank loans and when paying taxes.

Are you a parody account?

Do you remember Trump University? Trump issued fake diplomas, and ended up paying $24 million to people he scammed. Do you recall Gandhi or MLK ever scamming anyone?

James Comer will be the replacement, sooner or later.

The point is that Xi would be a lot more aggressive if the US dropped its support for Ukraine. Conversely, if Ukraine wins and Putin is deposed/killed, Xi is going to think twice about future aggresive moves.

You don't understand the modeling process. There are many institutions and agencies worldwide producing climate models. These models roughly agree. IPCC also produces models. There is no mysterious process for "choosing" models.

What you need to know is: CO2 levels have increased dramatically. Most of that additional CO2 is manmade. CO2 traps heat in the lower atmosphere - more CO2, more heating. Therefore, global temperatures rise as CO2 levels rise. It's not rocket science. Is there any part of this you don't understand?