Jump to content

Danderman123

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Danderman123

  1. Nope. This is very simple, so I will type slowly so you understand. One scientist had a sample that was 2.1 million years old and reported the results. Another scientist had an older sample and reported the results. This is presumably confusing for you. Imagine if you actually had to read a scientific paper instead of having your internet friends provide you with a distorted synopsis.
  2. Easy to see where you are going with this: You will ignore the science of atmospheric physics, since everyone in that field "have jobs that rely on climate change". So, you listen to cranks in other fields, who are largely clueless about atmospheric physics. Just like someone who disagrees with medical science, and has an accountant perform heart surgery for them.
  3. https://www.mediaite.com/politics/matt-gaetz-shouts-that-only-through-force-do-we-make-any-change-while-standing-beside-trump-in-iowa/ Matt Gaetz Shouts That ‘Only Through Force Do We Make Any Change’ While Standing Beside Trump in Iowa Trump is on trial for something like this, right?
  4. and some flights from UTP to Isaan would be nice.
  5. Mu Space has big plans, and always will.
  6. Domestic THAI flights are jammed, due to high demand and small airplanes. It's time they took some of their A330s out of storage, and deployed them on domestic routes.
  7. Next week, Trump will probably be indicted in Fulton County, Georgia.
  8. Nice deflection from this topic. I would be happy to talk about Republican wars, but that would be off topic. So, which of Trump's mooks will be indicted next?
  9. You are correct. If there were a topic about Biden's flaws, I would have plenty to post. But this topic is about Trump going to the monkey house, so let's stay on topic.
  10. Hello. I prize reality over party talking points. I am still waiting for you to stop with the talking points and post some actual thoughts.
  11. The judge in the Jan 6 case has given Trump notice that if he tries to pollute the jury pool with inflammatory statements, she will accelerate the trial date to minimize the damage.
  12. It would be interesting to hear from the Trumpers as to which of Trump's mooks are going to be indicted. It's not very likely that the Trump Lie Machine has given them any talking points on Trump's accomplices, so they would have to think to respond, and I suspect that thinking would be arduous for most of them. So, Yellowtail, Bignok, Nauseous: who will be indicted?
  13. *Deleted post edited out* https://www.brookings.edu/articles/did-nato-promise-not-to-enlarge-gorbachev-says-no/ "Gorbachev replied: “The topic of ‘NATO expansion’ was not discussed at all, and it wasn’t brought up in those years. ".
  14. Let's put it a different way: CO2 levels are higher than at any point in time since the emergence of Homo Sapiens.
  15. No, most were engineers, with some geologists on the list. Many were quite famous, but quite clueless about climate.
  16. Wrong. Even Gorbachev has stated that it's not true.
  17. A bunch of engineers and geologists who were dead wrong in 2012. The impact of CO2 on climate is well established. I know some of the signatories quite well, and they don't know anything about atmospheric physics.
  18. This is a tired old argument used by people who have little understanding of the problem. It is true that during the history of Earth, there have been wild climate extremes. But, the reality is that our civilization was developed to exist in a certain temperature range. Outside of that range, and mass numbers die. They won't care that it was 10 degrees warmer in the time of the dinosaurs. If you go out, and its very hot, if someone tells you it was a hotter a million years ago, that doesn't help you. And that's your post in a nutshell.
  19. There is a scientific process, during which individual scientists can participate. But, writing op-eds is not part of that process.
  20. The scientist is Judith Curry, a well known quasi-Denier.
  21. if you are going to base your opinion on claims from one scientist (or one doctor), you will constantly be surprised by reality. Unless you are trolling, you can't possibly expect anyone to pay any attention to your post.
  22. True, but global temperatures had been declining for 8,000 years until the current warming.
  23. The problem is that the current, human induced warming is heating the planet despite a natural cooling trend. In fact, if your internet friends were smarter, they would state: "yes, humans are causing a warming trend, but that's protecting us from nature plunging us into an Ice Age".
  24. Your internet friends have sent you talking points that look good to you, but are irrelevant to this discussion. The mechanism by which CO2 warms the planet is well understood. If you don't believe, explain why the stratosphere has been cooling. Your internet friends can't give you any talking points about that, sorry.
×
×
  • Create New...