Danderman123

I'm not going to vote for a candidate with multiple felony indictments. Can you say the same?

Trump is being charged with obstruction of an official procedure, ie the counting of electoral votes on January 6. It appears you have not read the indictment (its anathema to Trumpers, like holy water to a vampire). As for the incitement to storm the Capitol: "We will stop the steal" "If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore' "We are going to the Capitol" "You will have an illegitimate president. That is what you will have, and we can't let that happen." And then Trump watched for hours as his minions assaulted the police and threatened to hang Mike Pence. Why didn't Trump stop them?

On January 6, Trump incited a crowd to go to the Capitol to fight. Then, he sat back and watched for hours as the police were assaulted, and he did nothing. That alone warrants jail time.

from your posted link: "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case." So, what is the basis of "Lock her up"?

I took a look at the Nightwish web site: https://nightwish-group.com/ Some major bars are off their list, including Kawaii bar and Sexy in the City.

Please answer the question: what crimes did Hillary Clinton commit to warrant being locked up?

The final stage of all these trials will be an insanity plea by Trump's lawyers. He will resist, but psych evaluation will indicate that an insanity plea is warranted. For you Trumpers who believe everything he says, I am so sorry you are following a crazy person.

Bar for sale on Soi Chaiyapoon. I don't think it was open very long.

Here's a question for the Trump fans: Remember "Lock her up"? What was Hillary Clinton's alleged crime?

Ironically, under the Trump administration, penalties for mishandling of classified documents were increased.

Link, please.

Live by the Dershowitz, die by the Dershowitz: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dianebrady/2023/06/09/dershowitz-sees-a-possible-smoking-gun-in-trump-indictment/?sh=180c42767af7 Dershowitz Sees A Possible Smoking Gun In (Mar-a-Lago) Trump Indictment

An assertion without any basis in reality. What you really mean is: "once you get out of lock-step with *reality*, all your credibility is gone!"

Not many people have the mental capacity to direct complex criminal investigations. However, if you believe that there is some secret left wing group directing these indictments, you are deluded.

Let's see if you can address the facts in the indictment.

You have not commented on the content of the facts in the indictment, other than a child-like "they're false". Time to address the facts, or stop trolling, BigNok.

How old are you? You can answering by addressing facts in the indictment.

As noted above, Trump's lawyers quickly responded to the Mar-a-Lago search with defenses. Not this time, though. Did you find anything false in this latest indictment?

Speaking of contested allegations, remember when Trump's lawyers came out of the gate in response to the search of Mar-A-Lago claiming that the documents were declassified by Trump and planted by the FBI? Or Trump was allowed classified documents by the Presidential Records Act.... whatever happened to those defenses?

I got a new Facebook friend, an older lady who professes her eternal love for me. She sends me messages on Messenger every day. Strangely, she sends the same photo of herself all the time. I wonder why she can't take a new photo to send to me.

Have the Trump lawyers found any facts in the indictment that are false? They have had a week to go over it. A reasonable person would conclude that uncontested allegations are probably true.

It's early in the campaign still. Wait until January to worry about poll numbers. This leads to the inevitable question of whether American media is stupid or evil. Because ..... When a political candidate gets caught doing something wrong, their poll numbers bump up. For a while. And then drop like a rock. Because early polls over-rely on name recognition. But that wears off if the name is tarnished. For an example, see Gary Hart, 1988.

Oh wait, Trump just committed "technical violations" of the Constitution, per his soon-to-be-fired lawyer.

Do you think that Jack Smith misquoted the Republicans who testified against Trump? If so, why aren't they complaining? Why aren't the Grand Jurors complaining? Or, did the Republicans testifying against Trump simply make stuff up? If so, why are you blaming Jack Smith? Ypu really haven't thought this through, have you?

You lost the plot. The comment you responded to were a response to the question of Trump's sordid history before the current indictments.