Danderman123

If you consider donations to support elections operations as support for any particular candidate, you are deluded. You are panic trolling.

I have no idea what the percent of women who have voted is. The question is what is the percentage of early votes who are female. According to the data, 43% of the voters are male: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/early-vote

It looks like you are panic posting. I'll be happy to discuss Trump's felony convictions after the election, except you'll be gone.

If some billionaire drops $50 million on Trump, does that have any bearing on whether Trump will win? If you really need to look at how people putting money on the candidates is predictive, compare donations to Harris vs Trump.

I hope you understand that betting markets have no predictive value concerning elections.

You really are a sucker for disinformation, aren't you? Posts misrepresent Mark Zuckerberg’s election spending While Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, collectively donated at least $400 million to two nonprofit organizations to help various government election offices across the country, the funds were not contributions to Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign and did not violate campaign finance laws.

The function of a jury is to evaluate the evidence and decide the facts. The jury unanimously found Trump guilty.

Nope. Many of Trump's legal efforts were denied because of lack of evidence. I have posted the summary of the Trump cases here before: https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections Here's one example: Bower v. Ducey (D. Ariz. Dec. 9, 2020) – The district court largely dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds of lack of standing. However, the court did touch upon the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud, ultimately finding that the plaintiffs’ claims were largely based on, “anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections.” For one, the declarations from poll watchers that the plaintiffs provided as proof of fraud did not actually allege fraud at all, but rather simply raised concerns about the manner and process by which election officials matched signatures on absentee ballots. Moreover, none of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses stated that defendants committed any fraud; instead, they only provided speculative statements about what “could have” happened. As a personal note, the fact that you still believe what you posted is indicative of your psychological state - you refuse to accept facts and continue to live in your fantasy world. Trump lost in 2020. Get over it.

Were the Nazis Fascists?

I'll believe the jury that heard the evidence over you.

Apparently, you don't like women. A lot of incels supporting Trump don't like women.

Off the top of my head, it's $76 million. A lot of that went to his canvassing efforts, which apparently have failed.

I agree with getting nasty chemicals out of food, who wouldn't. But in order to successfully campaign against nasty chemicals, it is necessary to do so using science.

When special counsel Robert Hur's report on his yearlong investigation into President Joe Biden's handling of classified materials was made public last week, it said no charges were warranted because the evidence wasn't sufficient to support a conviction. You know, I am beginning to think you can't comprehend what you read. Lately, your posts demonstrate a major lack of information.

Yes, the states may block any changes to Title 9 via the courts. If a state accepts the changes, they become effective. If a state doesn't accept, they can go to court. Ultimately, it's up to the states. It seems you don't understand this very simple concept.

Undocumented Immigrant Offending Rate Lower Than U.S.-Born Citizen Rate

As you know, illegals commit crimes at a much lower rate than citizens. If you worry about rapist's and pedophiles, you can complain about Christians.

How many times can you post lies before your account explodes: New Title IX Rule Blocked in Texas Florida ban on new Title IX rules stays in place

Elon clearly has had a stroke. He's not the same person I knew back in the day.

Time for some calculations. About 50% of the likely electorate have voted already. It looks to be 55% female. Since women back Harris 55-45, Trump needs to have Election Day turnout to be 55-45 male plus some margin. Also, turnout has to be 75 million plus on ED. You can look at the video of people voting on Tuesday to see if it's heavily male.

After Trump loses, Congress will legalize abortion nationally. You are showing why women are voting against Trump, especially if they live in a state with strict abortion bans.

There are Trumpers here who live off Social Security. If Trump wins, and cuts Social Security, he will claim it was Elon's decision. The Trumpers will accept it and wither away.

You are complaining about the very elites who back Trump. Since college educated people tend to vote Dem, the Republicans try to limit who can go to college via reducing public funding for tuition.

Trumpers support 10 year old girls having to carry their rapist's baby to term. Trump donors are bringing in millions of illegals to work in their farms and factories. I notice that neither Trump nor you ever mention that.