stevenl

So where is he siding with Hamas? He is and has been supplying Israel with weapons.

He is and has been giving lots and lots of weapons. On certain bombs he is now saying 'wait, is this really necessary now?'. And now you're claiming he is siding with terrorist. Your posts are nonsense.

Even as a critical of Israel poster I can only say that the stupidity and lack of facts in your post is astounding.

So to prevent human suffering and civilian deaths in Gaza just bomb them all to smithereens.

Afaik deep bore, same water as the clear blue bottles.

Exactly right, the timeline doesn't match.

"Btw, when the war ends, Netanyahu will be held to account by his own people,and probably end up in court. And not just for corruption.". I hope so but don't think so.

Since there is no free press in Russia it is called propaganda.

"Thais generally use the white bottle water for washing or cooking, although many do drink it. It's most likely filled from the tap." On Phuket it is not filled from the tap.

And you're accusing others of spewing hate and venom?

Then they wouldn't be in a jam requiring state department assistance.

They didn't get into an extended conflict. They were invaded and had no choice.

Yes, he was. He is labelling anti Israel protests as pro Hamas and anti-Semitic.

I don't understand these kind of posts. You may disagree with the poster, but why the ad hominem attacks in stead of refuting his reasoning.

Ask whatever you want. I'll stick to the post I replied to in stead of your deflections.

Nothing to do with the post I replied to. As always you're deflecting.

So what is not true? Did Israel assist hamas? How was the popularity of hamas before the attack?

Many beautiful unpolluted places in China.

Why does he still have 7 days for reconsideration?

Nothing illegal about fake positive reviews. Would be up to Google, tripadvisor etc to take action there.

Phuket town is popular with Thai tourists.

And now look at your life expectancy at birth and your present life expectancy and you're there.

So far 3 nay-sayers who don't know Phuket.

Pomchop explained why she was put on the stand. Imo he forgot one reason, Trump's denial to have had sex with her "She was called to clearly lay out what her story would have been if she had gone public with it two weeks prior to the election and her testimony demonstrated to the jury what a sick man trump is from tricking a porn star into having sex with him to telling her she reminded him of his daubhter before he shed his silk pajamas and had sex with her...a story that obviously would have damaged trumps chances of getting elected.It might have been too much slease for even the bible beating magas to swallow. She has nothing to do with the documents being falsified but overall the jury deserves to know why trump and his campaign were so freaked out over the story coming out that they were willing to falisy records to pay her off and try rather clumbsily to hide the payments....goes to motive."

I'm confused to. Are you trolling or dumb?