No, I have a Thai license.
As someone who used to work in insurance I find it strange that people will say 'insurance will not pay' as a general statement. There are way too many variables for a statement like that.
England lost because it didn't take the opportunities it had. Yes, they deserved to win, but if you don't take your chances you lose, often followed by finger pointing at others.
Yes, Australia is happy. The topic though is not about Australia being happy with trade deals but the UK being unhappy, the latter partly due to lack of and unfavorable trade deals.
So you're quoting an Australian paper saying how happy Australia is with the trade deal with the UK and India to prove that the UK is doing well on trade deals.
Do you really think your reasoning makes sense?
In that link is exactly the same text as quoted here quite a few times before.
The solution for you is easy: anything in Topics that mentions Trump, don't read it. Because why would you want to know the truth?
I'll take your post positive since you seem to object to the source, implying you don't like the message. Which leads to the conclusion that even for maga supporters undermining the constitution is a step too far.
I'm stating that it sure is possible. You're leaping to conclusions based on your own perception.
Why would she respond to a threat that is clearly illegal under the applicable labout law?