ozimoron

Nearly a quarter of former President Trump’s supporters say he should not be the Republican nominee for president in 2024 if he is convicted of a crime, according to a survey released Tuesday. The New York Times/Siena College poll found 24 percent of respondents who said they would vote for Trump in the upcoming election also say he should not be the nominee if found guilty in one of his legal trials, “even if he has won the most votes.” https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4369225-quarter-trump-supporters-oppose-him-on-ticket-if-convicted-survey/

The ONLY people who get approved for asylum protection have to PROVE their lives are in danger where they came from.

I wish it did, your spreading piffle.

Even a child realizes that anything which traps droplets of fluid from a sneeze or cough will reduce the spread of the virus. Did your mother never tell you to put your hand over your mouth when you cough? It was good advice.

McGill University explained it for you. Should I believe them or you?

Misrepresented. Surgical masks won't prevent the wearer from being infected. It does not say you it won't protect an infected wearer from infecting others. A Surgical Mask Won't Protect You From Coronavirus The masks are designed to prevent you from infecting someone else with your germs, not to prevent someone else’s germs from infecting you. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health/surgical-mask-wont-protect-you-coronavirus

If God existed there would only be one of them.

Nothing but pure politically driven drivel. Totally refuted by science.

This one was. My fiberglass Bell helmet in 1979.

You're peddling IDF propaganda? At least nobody here has the temerity to post Hamas propaganda.

I've mentioned your predilection for messenger shooting previously.

I denied the accusation that I believed Israel deserved to be attacked. In this very thread I had previously condemned Hamas for the attacks and labeled them as war criminals. You ignored the "whipping boy" jibe in your own post to insist that my post referred to the previous sentence. Absolutely disingenuous in the extreme. You didn't misunderstand, you set out to discredit me be cause you can't see fault by Israel.

Not sure about Canadians but Netanyau and Galen are war criminals and can be aptly described as demons.

I don't deny writing it. My post was a response to the whipping boy accusation, not the I hope this never happens to you pathos.

You are doing a great deal of messenger shooting. In fact you rarely do anything else these days. Running out of arguments to defend Israel I guess.

Do you not understand what I said? I have written many contemporaneous posts which condemn Hamas for the terrorist attack. You have probably read some of them. It is not rational to accuse me of claiming Israel deserved to be attacked.

As I said. You are misrepresenting me. You said. and I quote "I hope none of your family have to go through what those innocent Israelis went through on the 7/10, you might wake up and have a reality check. Israel has become a whipping block to you." The last sentence, always the most relevant was what I replied to. It means that Israel deserves to be a whipping block. I stand by that. I does not state or imply that I believe Israel deserved to be attacked. Assertions to that effect are lies and reflect reading comprehension issues.

I said quote me. You are deliberately misrepresentign what I said with this screen shot. Why are you afraid to quote me properly.? I have reported your post.

Why won't you quote my post instead of screen shotting it? Something to hid about the context? I said Israel deserves condemnation not that the victims of the massacre deserved to die. You are blatantly lying. Quote me or begone. This is cowardly.

Is that a crime? Where were they going to put them? In an army base? Your problem is the blind one sided attitude that if one side isn't wearing a uniform and has planes then they are war criminals and if they do then they are soldiers doing their duty.

I toild you, you deny that Israel committed any offenses at all.

Nothing gets left behind until the ICC convicts those reponsible for war crimes on both sides. You might feel like something that has been said can never again be said. You alone.

Try not flaming

"On the other side, there are many people that are frustrated with that and ready to turn the page and get away from this toxic, divisive type of language," she continued. "That's why they're looking at other candidates, like Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis. So he can bring it on and energize his base, but there are other Republicans out there that are looking for someone that is less chaotic and less toxic in their rhetoric and language." https://www.rawstory.com/trump-toxic-christmas-posts/