Liverpool Lou

Read what I posted "This recent thread" Did I post recent statistics answer is NO My point was that those stats are meaningless because they are so out of date. Read what I posted, i.e. "that five-year old report". Did I post, "that recent thread"? The answer is NO.

You did. You clipped my post to a couple of words and posted it as my quote which altered the context from a question to a statement 28. You will not make changes to messages quoted from other members posts, except for purposes of shortening the quoted post. Do not shorten any post in a way that alters the context of the original post.

"Bunjong's family, while performing his funeral rites, indicated no intention of suing Urai..."

Hear, hear.

Pretty good but not a patch on Haagen-Dazs.

Most of the figures used in that five-year old report were from 2017, hardly recent statistics!

You did. You clipped my post to a couple of words and posted it as my quote which altered the context from a question to a statement and was, therefore, inaccurate, that is a transgression of the rules here.

The OP states that it is valid.

From the OP... "Prior to her death, Catherine had drawn up a legal will allocating her entire wealth to her housemaid..."

He? Can't you read?

"Foreigners" are more than 5% of the population, not a negligible number. Well done for misquoting me and contravening the forum rules by clipping my post to alter the context and make it appear that my question was a statement, it was not. My actual post was... "...to be as accurate as any of us can be, does 99.5% Thais/0.5% foreigners make you happier?"

""...expats", the term you used...I guess you know all this." What I do know is that it was OldmanJ who specified expats originally in the post to which I responded, not I. I guess you don't know all this?... "Is it only me or does it appear that the Thai government are trying to slowly drive us expats out..."

Perhaps it's the social pharmaceuticals.

The forum is foreigner-oriented and the articles are almost solely of interest to the foreigners that read it, that's probably why.

"...what would you do, standby and watch or defend and fight for your friend? No one has an obligation to respect anyone else and subjective disrespect doesn't justify a fight, nor physical defence, on behalf of someone else.

It wasn’t. He’s just a troll making stuff up. I know.

No, it is not, it is for anyone to use but those categories have precedence.

There is, and that is probably how the BTS staff knew that there was a problem and called for assistance.

.

Poles understand that word.

Why did you fail to include American, British and European gangsters?

Section 1465-1493 of the Civil and Commercial Code debunks your "knowledge".

Total nonsense and defamatory.

So what?

She identifies as a Honda motorbike. His name, not hers... "Known as “Frame Wave125,” the man was arrested..."