Liverpool Lou

...no reliable link from you regarding their not paying any taxes.

You have provided nothing that backs your false claim that "the royal family do not pay any taxes".

...assuming that they did not make voluntary IT payments that you could not ever know about.

REALLY??? how so, is the article incorrect, do you have supporting data to your claim Very easily confirmed by a number of sources! The article did not report that "the royal family do not pay any taxes". Do you have any supporting data for your claim that "they do not pay any taxes"?

What makes you think that the royal family do not pay any taxes? The King does, voluntarily, as does the Prince of Wales. Other members pay tax in the normal way.

Pathetic....truly pathetic. I'm amazed that admin allow trash like that to be posted.

If you don't know by now, I can't help you. I'm not asking for help, I'm asking you on what you base your nonsensical claim?

That bogwash is based on what?

"...it seems the cashier used own/friends cards". No it doesn't, there's no evidence that that is the case. What names were on the cards?

How do you know that they "bend the rules in their own personal favour"? Why accuse them of dishonesty by assuming that it is not company policy? Perhaps they are doing exactly as they are instructed. Either way, whatever they do has no effect on you, at all. so why try to make a big deal out of it?

Pizza Hut did not "change to The Pizza Company", they are two different businesses and they are both still here. I'd guess that the confused are confused by your confusion. Perhaps the emoji was awarded to you by Minor International or PH Capital, the respective owners of The Pizza Co and Pizza Hut?.

Subway as a brand has not gone cashless, you may have tried one franchise that has...but I doubt it, why would they do that?

Which "human right" extends to you the right to citizenship in Thailand?

What are the details and benefits of the subscription offer? Where is it?

Par for the AN course.

Give it up, a simple internet search gives you all the answers. If confirmation was available it would have been posted by now. Why should I have to go searching the internet for information that does not exist when a simple corroborating answer to my question would have sufficed? And who are you to tell me to "give it up"?

Instead of asking for links (at later claim they are bias) you could actually follow the news. Read The Economist for instance. You might learn something. As could you! The reason that I asked him was that I do read the news and his post was not factual. "Instead of asking for links (at later claim they are bias) you could..." Instead of lamely attempting to rebuke me for asking for sources of, clearly, false information, you could have posted your Economist's confirmation of his figures...if there was any. Obviously there are not.

Doesn't their confession count? Perhaps B200 was all that was left after someone had left with all the winnings?!

Looks like about 2 in 3 people agree with him according to the latest survey. Which survey? Yours? Such naivete if you believe all the tosh responses!

"The victim believed that the two foreigners were French nationals due to their accents while speaking English, although he was not entirely certain of this assumption".

"The victim believed that the two foreigners were French nationals due to their accents while speaking English, although he was not entirely certain of this assumption".

Not facts, then, just your speculative opinion. I'm not claiming to have facts, you did that even though you can't justify what you posted.

Says who? Aren't alleged "facts", such as those supposed to be backed by a credible (unbiased) source on this forum?

Cobblers. Unless you can quote it.

"Officers at Mueang Pattaya Police Station reported that they successfully identified Nam and her boyfriend. The man was a member of a rescue team in Nonthaburi province near Bangkok, not the police officer as his vest suggested. Officers are continuing their investigation to bring the two suspects to justice".