Liverpool Lou

No, it is not illegal. The delivery man's job is, oddly enough, to deliver goods, not collect unwanted, opened packages.

Buy one of each to find out then you can use the flip top on the other tubes when you're ready to use them.

I'm sure that there are some additional financial requirements that he'd need to take into consideration, aren't there? Money in the bank, monthly income?

A good guess would be the legal aid scheme, i.e. the government.

This only happened once, according to the article, and I'm not even sure it fits the definition of a scam. What? Multiple people were contacted after his FB account was hacked and they were all asked for money, fraudulently. Non-existent loan facilities were offered as were the fraudulent offer of iPhones.

So could sending her home...she's 90 fkin 5!

No second prizes mate. 😂 Facebook 👀 Ha ha That seems to be a suggestion that you think that you've won first prize! Ha ha! There's no prizes here.

Surely you can't be trying to suggest that you are not in that category, also?

YAWN... Double yawn...

Be careful using illegal pepper spray!

Italian https://www.facebook.com/mario.rotsaert

Local radio station said he was Italian. Mario Rotsaert says that he is Belgian. But I'm sure that the local radio station knows better. https://www.facebook.com/mario.rotsaert

I know that, but the Italian thinks it's his beach. The Belgian.

and here you are again arguing bull<deleted> semantics when you know the true meaning and intent of a statement. Do you hold an actual opinion on the matter, or would you just prefer to spend the day bickering over individual words? "...and here you are again arguing bull<deleted>..." And here you are again, referring to nothing more than an accurate observation as "arguing". "Do you hold an actual opinion on the matter, or would you just prefer to spend the day bickering over individual words?" Do you hold an actual position on this forum that authorises you to decide how other members should post or to interrogate them?

Should be? The victim did not want damages.

Italian guy, maybe friends with the Swiss nutjob. Belgian.

Agree, 100%.

His own Facebook account, advertising his business, and his personal FB account, "doxed" him first. Claiming the beach to be his and chasing off people who use it perfectly legally, is more reprehensible than his being identified.

"...if you are on his beach". Mario does not have a beach that is "his".

Oh did it not? it certainly seems Mr Thakorn was hoping to achieve something similar. The man was fined for his actions, yet the complainant demanded more. No, it did not. The victim did not petition for deportation (not that he could!) he wanted the Belgian properly checked, that's all.

How could he know that to be the case? It is highly unlikely that his passport wasn't checked if a fine was issued and, being the owner of/involved in the resort, even more unlikely that his visa wasn't valid.

"...and petition for deportation". Something that did not happen in this case.

The best way, maybe, but the illegal way.

It is a public beach that has nothing to do with Mr Mario or "his resort", there is no light to be shed on that situation.

"Entitled" means the granting of some benefit; implicitly, somebody else would do the entitling. "Self-entitled" implies that nobody else has granted this benefit to a person, except that supposed beneficiary.