Liverpool Lou

What has that got to do with a UK case?

What's the relevance of penalties in Thailand to this case?

Easy for the RTP to track down someone in Thailand, impossible for them to do the same out of their jurisdiction which stops at the Thai borders.

"How did he leave the U.K. in the first instance?" He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, he is wanted as a suspect...don't believe everything you read in AN OPs. "How has he been allowed to compete in boxing matches?" Why shouldn't he be allowed to compete?

That I find extremely hard to believe - you do not get more than 3-5 years for stabbing someone What you believe is irrelevant to facts, supplying Class A carries a max of life...and he didn't stab anyone.

Why do you care about the Red Bull Boss? it was a cop that died, Boss paid the family off, they accepted it as is normal and acceptable here. And it was an accident, he did not intend to kill the cop who was out of his car on the motorway at night. Quite right. ...apart from the "motorway" and "out of his car" parts, he was on Sukhumvit Road, Thong Lor, on a motorbike.

How on earth was he out and about after being convicted and handed a life sentence? Despite the OP, he was not convicted and sentenced, he was wanted as a suspect.

What for? What has he been convicted of in Thailand? What has he been convicted of in the UK, come to that?

British police are under no obligation to act on an Interpol advisory notice.

Still not heard of a life sentence for that The fact that you haven't heard of it doesn't mean that it isn't the case for supplying!

Suspected of, not convicted or sentenced for, offences that carry a life sentence.

So true.

Staffordshire Bull Terriers are dangerous? Really? What experience do you have of them in order to make that claim?

American Bull Terrier falls under the SPCA umbrella term of Pit Bull. Not my words, talk to SPCA were I quoted the info. Expand There were no American Bull Terriers involved in the attack, either. Your post, to which I responded originally, suggested that Pit Bulls were involved. Pedantic again... The dog was reported as being an 'American bully' dog... Strange how accuracy becomes pedanticism in so many posters' eyes. You're right, the dog was reported as being an American Bully, it was definitely not reported as being a Pit Bull, two very different things, so my comment was accurate, not pedantic.

American Bull Terrier falls under the SPCA umbrella term of Pit Bull. Not my words, talk to SPCA were I quoted the info. There were no American Bull Terriers involved in the attack, either. Your post, to which I responded originally, suggested that Pit Bulls were involved.

I wonder if municipal workers have the power of kidnap and arrest?

Obviously, yes, when they're advertised on Facebook!

Why should he advocate that (he didn't)? Every wild animal in the world hasn't killed a human, has it?

You really think that they're going to publish the part were they're ripping him to bits? They couldn't find his ears.

....breed?.... Indeed! I was hungry. Most people here wouldn't know, anyway. Even I'm not perfect!

There were no Pit Bulls involved in this attack.

what are they then, apart from killers that need to be put down? The "XL" is a clue, there are different sizes of that obnoxious bread.

No, the third was the mother ("Tang") of the two that attacked him and she was trying to protect him, the Thai dog was "Tan"

What "colour"? Black, perhaps?

No dogs are not the most dangerous animals to people but nice try. You conveniently omitted a very relevant part of the context his post... "Dog attacks on humans outnumber all other animal attacks combined"... but "nice try". Pathetic try, in fact.