Liverpool Lou

TV CH3 did not report that in the link!

But, then, you (nor anyone else) have not seen his private medical records, so both your "AFAIK" and your "diagnosis" is nonsense. His daughter did report that he did have surgery a week or so ago.

It is. He's in the custody of the Corrections Department while being treated.

You really can't help yourself, can you? No one eats fish heads in Thai prisons...unless visitors bring it in for them.

All those who need it. They also get treatment in hospital, by doctors, when necessary.

Prisoners in Thai jails (including the one Thaksin was in) are not shackled and are provided with toilets (and showers), not holes in the ground.

I'd love to see you try to point out the "gobbledigook" in any of my comments relating to this thread. With your explanation of why you think it was "gobbledigook", of course.

I thought discussion of illegal activities was not allowed on the forum?

Range Rovers?

BL was a long time ago and LRs have not been "notorious" for that for decades.

There are plenty of other inflammable materials on cars besides diesel fuel that can burn following an electrical fault.

Ten minutes ago I downloaded the NatWest Bankline app in Bangkok from Play Store with no problems using wifi (Dtac and True SIMs in the phone, mobile data off...if any of that matters).

How does Schwab apply to the NatWest apps?

I got a GiffGaff SIM and in order to get it operating a £10 credit was necessary but their app would not accept a payment from any of my Thai banks.

You can speak to real people easily if you call them! 02 018 0000.

(It's) Getting Better!

Well to put it accurately, not mildly, 5 years is not "way over the top" for a corruption and misconduct charge for senior government officials. What is "way over the top" is his putting himself in the position of committing 21 corruption and misconduct offences.

Which bank is that? "iBanking" is Bangkok Bank's terminology and that bank sure has not made that announcement.

Veracity. Why are you so reticent about it now you're being asked?

You are free to believe or disbelieve me. Up to you. So not true about the "many times" and "many offices", then. If it is true, what's the harm in being specific?

How many times and at which office?

Got anything that isn't hearsay to back up that "getting very common" assertion?

Huh? Where is that a question that has to answered? I'm not aware of any country where that can be asked with any expectation of a mandated explanation. Perhaps you could give an example?

In which jurisdiction is that a law when there is no reasonable suspicion of an offence?

Five years for the offence? Yes. Simple enough for you?