Liverpool Lou

Or use the discounted international codes that all the phone service providers here offer. B6/B7 per minute to the UK, typically.

That's why we are discussing it, I sure haven't reached, and won't reach, any verdict. Address your "jury" comment to those who have.

B2.5tn in first 10 months of '22. More than enough to cover their empty promises!

What else did you expect? You couldn't have tried very hard with those numbers before you posted your unwarranted, derogatory remarks about Lloyds. And thanks so much for your shouted reply.

How old were you when you were knocking about with 16-year old girls?

Bloke.

"...mine out of the entertainment industry". Wow, you were lucky, was she a singer, comedienne, chat show host, something like that?! I think the posters on this thread are assuming ex-bar girls are being discussed!

Gawd... If you say so.

"Alleged" that she stole the money ! ? I do not necessarily believe that ! Good for you. Don't quote that as my comment, I did not say that, I was quoting the comment of another poster.

Perhaps you missed the part described where it is alleged that she stole 10k. You go ahead with pretending that she is an innocent angel. "...alleged that she stole 10k". Yes, I did miss that. I didn't miss the part that reported that she had been lent a similar amount by the owner of the resort, though. Perhaps you missed that and they're one and the same? "You go ahead with pretending that she is an innocent angel". And you go ahead with not affording her the right of the presumption of innocence in the absence of any charges or evidence, so far.

The Notices work when there is co-operation between the two countries involved; if the country that the subject of the notice is located in isn't interested in working with the Thai authorities it's hard cheese. It's also worth bearing in mind that there's a huge difference between an extradition/Red Notice detention for a brutal, sadistic kidnapping and murder and a traffic accident causing death.

Did nothing in the links to four separate reports give you a clue?

"...the real motive, what exactly was it again..." Retaliation for the girl's refusing to have sex with one of them.

"...what the heck is 0345 266 8634 and ... +44 1733347007". They are both Lloyds Bank's contact numbers that do connect from here, I just got through on both of them. "0345" is a UK code that, obviously, needs "001 44" or "+44" as a prefix. What the heck did you think that they are?

Even though he's been identified as a Briton?

"...you'll have to excuse his confusion". And yours! An (activated) automatic sliding door would have, er, automatically slid open, the one in question clearly didn't.

"You can be charged with trespassing if you enter a 7-eleven store?" You really think that all he did was enter the 7-11? Posters here get weirder by the day.

Unfortunately there's no mom and pop places at that particular location. Neither is there a ban on the sale of alcohol at 3am. Edit: Oops, unless it's the 3am after midnight!

Read the full OP, it's all explained very clearly.

Please point out the inaccuracy or "trolling" aspect of my perfectly reasonable question suggesting that both sides of the story may be a good idea...

"...it appears no such proof exists". How can you conclude that "no such proof exists" based only on the one-sided report in the Daily Mirror (a rag that pays the family for this type of story) from a family who are doing nothing but soliciting cash donations?

Has it been reported that the insurer did not consult those people?

They apparently did...so what? What's that got to do with the theft?

Perhaps lie to her husband. Just as likely, based on what has been reported, that she didn't lie to him but you go ahead and speculate irrationally that she involved herself to the extent that she needs to be locked up also.

Won't argue. Don't alter other members posts as you did when you are quoting them, the forum rules are very clear about that. I did not post the comment above in that form that you attributed to me