Jump to content

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    26,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Liverpool Lou

  1. Nonsense. The B300 is not charged according to skin colour, neither are the Parks' entrance fees.
  2. Yes, when you enter (or travel to?) the country, retirees are not exempt.
  3. There is no suggestion from the government that the B300 is for "health or accident cover" for tourists. It is obviously intended to offset some of the governments cost of those who do not pay, it is not an insurance policy.
  4. "...no need to purchase accident insurance..." Where was that stated?
  5. Obviously, you need to get out a bit more. What is a "real espresso", anyway?
  6. Yes, no exemption for them entering Thailand, why should there be?
  7. Surely you don’t think his actions are not worthy of condemnation ?? Of course, not, and I didn't say that, I said "continued condemnation", i.e. condemnation ad nauseum.
  8. That's right, I agree, that's how the law works...commit offences, go to court, be found guilty, get fines for those offences, but the fines are not arbitrary, they are set out in the statutes.
  9. You can't read? It has been confirmed that he was not drunk as per traffic laws. Where has it been confirmed that he was specifically intoxicated "on meth"?
  10. Steady on, you're making perfectly rational sense, that will not go down well with some unreasonably illogical Thaivisa posters!
  11. He has been booked but now you want the laws that specify the fines applicable ignored just for his case? Or are you suggesting that there should be no limit on the size of fines for everyone and every offence?
  12. What "excuses, deflections and denials" have the police made?
  13. what exactly is there to confirm here ? In order for it to get anywhere in court, the specific narcotic, that's what.
  14. This man committed traffic offences in a terribly irresponsible way (even though there were no serious injuries) but he has acknowledged his resposibility, he has been charged with a number of offences (with more to come) and he has promised full compensation, including new vehicles to all involved. What more than that could he do for those involved and why so much continued condemnation of him by Thaivisa ranters?
  15. Such nonsense. What if the multi-millionaire been driving one of his company's pickups in the same accident, you'd be happy with a "proportional fine" then?
  16. On what do you base that profound critique, anything rational?
  17. Who will hold the remaining 40%? It'll be a listed company, so anyone can! Google the companies' shareholders, all the information is public.
  18. The OP didn't state that True/Dtac would have more subscribers, it described the merged companies as being the largest mobile operator. There is more than one way to measure the size of a company.
  19. From the OP, "...the merger is about more than just the mobile market, and plan to build on True’s existing strengths in broadband internet, pay TV, and digital services".
  20. They only have to pass the emissions test at the time of the test so it's not unlikely that it did pass. Yes, yes, before someone jumps all over me, I know the emissions are supposed to met all the time but I'm referring only to the time of getting certified.
×
×
  • Create New...